Hello everyone, I use the version of Solr-7.7.3.
The following error occurred during the index write phase, but after restarting
the Solr service, the file was deleted, and access to the index has also been
restored.
Has anyone ever encountered this mistake?
Caused by: org.apache.lucene.
Hi Erick,
Thanks for your advice about having openSearcher set to true
unnecessary for my case. For CorruptIndexException issue, I think Solr
should handle this quite well too. Because I always shutdown tomcat
gracefully.
Recently I did a couple of tests about this issue. When
bq: This means Solr may get update request during shutdown. I think
that is the reason we get CorruptIndexException.
This is unlikely, Solr should handle this quite well. More likely you
encountered some other issue, one possibility is that you had a disk
full situation and that was the root of
request to Solr once get new message.
This means Solr may get update request during shutdown. I think that is the
reason we get CorruptIndexException. Since we begin to do the reboot, we
always get CorruptIndexException. The trace is as below:
2017-09-14 04:25:49,241
ERROR[commitScheduler-15-t
Hi,
Kindly provide your inputs on the issue.
Thanks,
Modassar
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Modassar Ather
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Got following error during optimize of index on 2 nodes of 12 node
> cluster. Please let me know if the index can be recovered and how and what
> could be the reason?
Hi,
Got following error during optimize of index on 2 nodes of 12 node cluster.
Please let me know if the index can be recovered and how and what could be
the reason?
Total number of nodes: 12
No replica.
Solr version - 5.4.0
Java version - 1.7.0_91 (Open JDK 64 bit)
Ubuntu version : Ubuntu 14.04.
Anyone has any inputs on this?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/getting-frequent-CorruptIndexException-and-inconsistent-data-though-core-is-active-tp4204129p4204347.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
en it reports that it succeeded, and then the
CorruptIndexException is thrown while trying to open searcher.
this core is marked as active and thus query can get redirected there and
this causes data inconsistency to users.
this occurs with solr 4.10.3, should be noted that I use nested docs.
AN
-
From: solr-user
Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2012 2:03 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: upgrading from 4.0 to 4.1 causes "CorruptIndexException: checksum
mismatch in segments file"
hi all
I have been working on moving us from 4.0 to a newer build of 4.1
I a
hi all
I have been working on moving us from 4.0 to a newer build of 4.1
I am seeing a "CorruptIndexException: checksum mismatch in segments file"
error when I try to use the existing index files.
I did see something in the build log for #119 re "LUCENE-4446" that mentions
&
It looks like your solr lucene-core version doesn't match with the
lucene version used to generate the index, as Yonik said, looks like
there is a lucene library conflict.
2009/8/19 Chris Hostetter :
>
> : how can that happen, it is a new index, and it is already corrupt?
> :
> : Did anybody else
: how can that happen, it is a new index, and it is already corrupt?
:
: Did anybody else something like this?
"Unknown format version" doesn't mean your index is corrupt .. it means
the version of LUcnee parsing the index doesn't recognize the index format
version ... typically it means you a
Wow, that is an interesting one...
I bet there is more than one Lucene version kicking around the
classpath somehow.
Try removing all of the servlet container's working directories.
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 4:41 AM, Maximilian
Hütter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> how can t
Hi,
how can that happen, it is a new index, and it is already corrupt?
Did anybody else something like this?
WARN - 2009-08-07 10:44:54,925 | Solr index directory 'data/solr/index'
doesn't exist. Creating new index...
WARN - 2009-08-07 10:44:56,583 | solrconfig.xml uses deprecated
, Please updat
Robert Haschart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To answer your questions: I completely deleted the index each time
> before retesting. and the java command as shown by "ps" does show -Xbatch.
> The program is running on:
> > uname -a
> Linux lab8.betech.virginia.edu 2.6.18-53.1.14.el5 #1 SM
Xbatch)
However, I am still seeing a different problem which is what caused me
to upgrade to Lucene version 2.3.1 and start experiencing the
CorruptIndexException.
Basically we have a set of 112 files dumped from our OPAC in a binary
Marc record format, each of which contains about 35000 records. In
ver, I am still seeing a different problem which is what caused me
to upgrade to Lucene version 2.3.1 and start experiencing the
CorruptIndexException.
Basically we have a set of 112 files dumped from our OPAC in a binary
Marc record format, each of which contains about 35000 records. In
additi
Hmmm, not good.
One other thing to try would be -Xint, which turns off hotspot
compilation entirely. On that last case that also prevented the issue.
Did you cleanly rebuild your index when you retested? And you're
really certain your JRE is running with -Xbatch? (You should be able
t
Mike,
You are right it does sound exactly like that situation. The java
version is:
java version "1.6.0_05"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_05-b13)
Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (build 10.0-b19, mixed mode)
Which seems to be the same as the one giving the other poster problems.
I
Which exact version of the JRE are you using? Can you try running
java with -Xbatch (forces up front compilation)?
Your situation sounds very similar to this one:
http://lucene.markmail.org/message/awkkunr7j24nh4qj
Mike
On Apr 17, 2008, at 10:57 AM, Robert Haschart wrote:
Greetings all
Greetings all,
We are using Solr to index Marc records to create a better, more user
friendly library catalog here at the University of Virginia. To do
this I have written a program starting from the VuFind Java importer
written by Wayne Graham (from the College of William & Mary). After
Maybe double check your CLASSPATHs?
Because, based on the line numbers in the exception, it really looks
like it's Lucene 2.1 that's trying to open a Lucene 2.2+ index. The
term infos file (.tii, .tis) changed from -2 -> -3 format in 2.3.
Mike
On Feb 25, 2008, at 7:19 AM, Paul Danese wro
2Unfortunately, the answer is "no". I didn't use an upgraded version of lucene
or solr. this is the bizzarre issue. I'm actually using solr via the
acts_as_solr plugin used in ruby.
At the time, I was adding a few 100-thousand docs to the index...there appears
to have been a memory leak as
did you create/modify the index with a newer version of lucene than the
one you use in solr?
In this case I doubt you can downgrade your index, but maybe you can
upgrade lucene in your solr (search in this forum, there should be a
thread about this), (or try with the latest nightly builds)
Pau
2Hi all,
Is there any way to recover from such an error as listed in the subject heading?
Luke can view the index just fine (at least at a cursory level Luke is able to
open the index, give me back the # of docs, etc.), but solr throws this
exception whenever I try and start it up.
any ideas o
: I've made room, restarted resin, and now solr won't start. No useful messages
: in the startup, just a
:
: [21:01:49.105] Could not start SOLR. Check solr/home property
: [21:01:49.105] java.lang.NullPointerException
: [21:01:49.105] at org
: .apache.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter.init(SolrDi
On Jan 14, 2008, at 4:08 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
ug -- maybe someone else has better ideas, but you can try:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/java/trunk/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/CheckIndex.java
thanks for the tip, i did run that, but I stopped it 30 minutes in, as
it was s
ug -- maybe someone else has better ideas, but you can try:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/java/trunk/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/CheckIndex.java
I think that converts (what it can) to a 2.3 index.
The NullPointerException should be gone in trunk, that is just an
artifact of st
We had an index run out of disk space. Queries work fine but commits
return
500 doc counts differ for segment _18lu: fieldsReader shows 104
but segmentInfo shows 212
org.apache.lucene.index.CorruptIndexException: doc counts differ for
segment _18lu: fieldsReader shows 104 but segmentInfo
29 matches
Mail list logo
