a
> change
> to my ruby code)?
>
> cheers,
> B
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Copying-few-field-using-copyField-to-non-multiValued-field-tp3066979p4022373.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
this possible with 'copyField'? or should i rather index the document
with that value initially set into the field (requiring a change
to my ruby code)?
cheers,
B
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Copying-few-field-using-copyField-
he full_name field look like this:
>
> john
> foo
>
>
> which is not working for the exact match...
>
> ideas?
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Copying-few-field-using-copyField-to-non-multiValued-field-tp3066979p4021605.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
field look like this:
john
foo
which is not working for the exact match...
ideas?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Copying-few-field-using-copyField-to-non-multiValued-field-tp3066979p4021605.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi Omri,
there are two limitations:
1. You can't sort on a multiValued field. (Anyway, on which of the
copied fields would you want to sort first?)
2. You can't make the multiValued field the unique key.
Both are no real limitations:
1. Better sort on at_country, at_state, at_city instead.
2. Sim
er | SirsiDynix
> P: 800.288.8020 X6943 | bob.sandif...@sirsidynix.com
> www.sirsidynix.com
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Omri Cohen [mailto:omri...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 8:42 AM
> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> >
In addition to Bob's response:
Am 15.06.2011 13:59, schrieb Omri Cohen:
[...]
> stored="true" required="false" />
> stored="true" required="false" />
> stored="true" required="false" />
> stored="true" required="false" />.
1. The value for "indexed" should either be "true" or "fals
How would the resulting single-valued field look like? Concatenate all input
fields into one long string?
If that's what you need, I've written a FieldCopy UpdateProcessor which can do
that. I'll contribute it in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2599
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution ar
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Omri Cohen wrote:
> thanks for the quick response, though as I said in my original post:
>
> *"some one has any idea, how I solve this without changing at_location to
> multiField? "*
[...]
This requirement makes little sense on the face of it, and as far as I kno
t; > http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SchemaXml
> >
> >
> > Bob Sandiford | Lead Software Engineer | SirsiDynix
> > P: 800.288.8020 X6943 | bob.sandif...@sirsidynix.com
> > www.sirsidynix.com
> >
> >
> > > -Original Message-
>
chemaXml
>
>
> Bob Sandiford | Lead Software Engineer | SirsiDynix
> P: 800.288.8020 X6943 | bob.sandif...@sirsidynix.com
> www.sirsidynix.com
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Omri Cohen [mailto:omri...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 8:00
e Engineer | SirsiDynix
P: 800.288.8020 X6943 | bob.sandif...@sirsidynix.com
www.sirsidynix.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Omri Cohen [mailto:omri...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 8:00 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Copying few field using copyField
Hello all,
in my schema.xml i have this fields:
.
I am trying to do the following:
I am getting the next exception:
ERROR: multiple values encountered for non multiValued copy field
at_location
some one has any idea, how I solve this without changing at_location to
multiFie
13 matches
Mail list logo