7.2 and 4.10.4 to the older
> source code.
>
> Thanks,
> Shawn
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Compiling-SolrJ-for-Java-6-tp4238068p4238095.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 11/3/2015 3:33 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> You're on your one if you try to do this. Solr 4.10 requires Java7. I
> don't believe Solr will even compile under 1.6.
>
> You may bet lucky and get SolrJ to compile, but whether it works or
> not is chancy at best.
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> On Tue, Nov 3,
rks or
> not is chancy at best.
>
> Best,
> Erick
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Compiling-SolrJ-for-Java-6-tp4238068p4238081.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
r version: 51" which means Java 7.
> >
> > Besides making the change in the /solr/common-build.xml, is there
> > some
> > other change I need to make to be able to compile SolrJ for Java 6?
> >
> > Thank you,
> > O. O.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Compiling-SolrJ-for-Java-6-tp4238068.html
> > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
; other change I need to make to be able to compile SolrJ for Java 6?
>
> Thank you,
> O. O.
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Compiling-SolrJ-for-Java-6-tp4238068.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Thank you,
O. O.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Compiling-SolrJ-for-Java-6-tp4238068.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
