Yeah, and actually later I've found someone mentioned that
they had done some benchmarks and found that replication
is faster than collection distribution.
Thanks
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Mark Miller wrote:
>
> On Oct 27, 2011, at 2:57 PM, Alireza Salimi wrote:
>
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > If
On Oct 27, 2011, at 2:57 PM, Alireza Salimi wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> If we ignore the features that Replication provides (
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrReplication#Features),
> which approach is better?
> Is there any performance problems with Replication?
>
> Replications seems quite easier
ster. See the performance
numbers: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrReplication
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Collection-Distribution-vs-Replication-in-Solr-tp3458724p3459178.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Kelkoo SAS
Sociét
Sturlese wrote:
>
>> Replication is easier to manage and a bit faster. See the performance
>> numbers: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrReplication
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Collection-Distribution-vs-Replication-in-Sol
ne.472066.n3.nabble.com/Collection-Distribution-vs-Replication-in-Solr-tp3458724p3459178.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
Alireza Salimi
Java EE Developer
Replication is easier to manage and a bit faster. See the performance
numbers: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrReplication
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Collection-Distribution-vs-Replication-in-Solr-tp3458724p3459178.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing
Hi guys,
If we ignore the features that Replication provides (
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrReplication#Features),
which approach is better?
Is there any performance problems with Replication?
Replications seems quite easier (no special configuration, ssh setting, cron
setting),
while rsync is
