Good to know Shawn.
Thanks,
Rajeswari
On 1/29/20, 12:52 PM, "Shawn Heisey" wrote:
On 1/27/2020 4:59 AM, Vignan Malyala wrote:
> We are currently using solr without cloud with 500 cores. It works good.
>
> Now we are planning to expand it using solr cloud with 1000 cores, (2
c
On 1/27/2020 4:59 AM, Vignan Malyala wrote:
We are currently using solr without cloud with 500 cores. It works good.
Now we are planning to expand it using solr cloud with 1000 cores, (2 cores
for each of my client with different domain data).
SolrCloud starts having scalability issues once yo
Guys,
Did anyone work on this type of thing?
Can you please help with this? For real time deployment and issues?
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 5:29 PM Vignan Malyala wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We are currently using solr without cloud with 500 cores. It works good.
>
> Now we are planning to expand it using
Hi all,
We are currently using solr without cloud with 500 cores. It works good.
Now we are planning to expand it using solr cloud with 1000 cores, (2 cores
for each of my client with different domain data).
I'm planning to put all fields as "stored".
Is it the right thought? Will it have any i
