Re: Cache replication

2011-08-14 Thread Bill Bell
I'd have a high chance of running a lot uncached >> queries. >> >> Thanks :) >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >>http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Cache-replication-tp3240708p3240708.ht >>ml >> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>

Re: Cache replication

2011-08-10 Thread arian487
Thanks for the advice paul, but post processing is a must for me given the nature of my application. I haven't had problems yet though. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Cache-replication-tp3240708p3244202.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list ar

Re: Cache replication

2011-08-10 Thread didier deshommes
this isn't done, then I'd have a high chance of running a lot uncached > queries. > > Thanks :) > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Cache-replication-tp3240708p3240708.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >

Re: Cache replication

2011-08-09 Thread Paul Libbrecht
Arian, I've been doing results post-processing in some versions of the ActiveMath server and it has been the wrong choice as much as possible. Maybe this is not what you do, but the biggest flaw was that the post-processing was eliminating or adding results (for insiders of ActiveMath: converti

Re: Cache replication

2011-08-09 Thread arian487
rocessing as much as possible. But thanks alot! -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Cache-replication-tp3240708p3240853.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Cache replication

2011-08-09 Thread Erick Erickson
ot of slaves and if > this isn't done, then I'd have a high chance of running a lot uncached > queries. > > Thanks :) > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Cache-replication-tp3240708p3240708.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >

Cache replication

2011-08-09 Thread arian487
is is pretty important because I'm going to have a lot of slaves and if this isn't done, then I'd have a high chance of running a lot uncached queries. Thanks :) -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Cache-replication-tp3240708p3240708.html Sent