On 1/29/2015 12:05 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote:
> I do ant package because I want to have identical file system layout
> to the final distribution. Is there a target that does that? In my
> attempts to find it, all other targets had jars, etc all over the
> place.
>
> But that's my use-case, n
I do ant package because I want to have identical file system layout
to the final distribution. Is there a target that does that? In my
attempts to find it, all other targets had jars, etc all over the
place.
But that's my use-case, not OP's. So, possibly not relevant.
Regards,
Alex.
Sign
I would recommend 'ant server' instead. 'and example' is not recommended
anymore as that target is on track for removal.
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Erick Erickson
wrote:
> For working locally (i.e. not distributing a package) I always use "ant
> example" (although
> this target may be cha
For working locally (i.e. not distributing a package) I always use "ant
example" (although
this target may be changed).
"ant dist" gives me jars to link against for SolrJ programs.
FWIW,
Erick
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 9:25 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch
wrote:
> "ant package" in the solr directory w
On 1/29/2015 10:03 AM, Clemens Wyss DEV wrote:
> Why are solr*jars not being built? All others (including lucene) are built.
What steps are you taking, and what is not there that you expect to be
there?
Thanks,
Shawn
uar 2015 18:13
An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: Building Solr 5 from svn sources
On 1/29/2015 10:03 AM, Clemens Wyss DEV wrote:
> Why are solr*jars not being built? All others (including lucene) are built.
What steps are you taking, and what is not there that you expect to be there?
Thanks,
Shawn
"ant package" in the solr directory will generate the distribution
tars. That's the ultimate build.
Regards,
Alex.
Sign up for my Solr resources newsletter at http://www.solr-start.com/
On 29 January 2015 at 12:12, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 1/29/2015 10:03 AM, Clemens Wyss DEV wrote:
>>
Why are solr*jars not being built? All others (including lucene) are built.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Clemens Wyss DEV [mailto:clemens...@mysign.ch]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 29. Januar 2015 13:47
An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Betreff: AW: Building Solr 5 from svn sources
Thx
Thx!
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Tomoko Uchida [mailto:tomoko.uchida.1...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 29. Januar 2015 13:39
An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Building Solr 5 from svn sources
Yes, trunk is now for 6.0.
branch_5x is for 5.1.
5.0 release branch is
Yes, trunk is now for 6.0.
branch_5x is for 5.1.
5.0 release branch is lucene_solr_5_0
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-dev/201501.mbox/%3CCAKiERN4-qbj7BF%3DJgui4xUFKujwuP%2BodkZPesVT51xnXG1om_w%40mail.gmail.com%3E
2015-01-29 19:29 GMT+09:00 Clemens Wyss DEV :
> Looks like trunk is
Looks like trunk is Solr 6?
Should I build Solr 5 from
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/branches/branch_5x
11 matches
Mail list logo