1. Use edismax and the boost parameter. Multiplicative boosting works much,
much better than the additive boost used in dismax.
2. Use a log-scaled popularity value. If you know popularity is always greater
than 1, use “1 + log(popularity)”. It is a bit safer to use “1 + log(max(1,
popularity))
Hi Midas,
I am sure,even though you have results with constant relavance, sorting
will give you expected results.
Anyway there is parameter bf in dismax parser. Add parameter
bf=field(popularity) to query, It is similar to boost items by value in
popularity field. hence ultimately higher popularity
my use case do not suggest me to sort . i have set of data with same
relevance.
what should be query in that case .
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Rajendra Gaikwad
wrote:
> Hi Midas,
>
> Sort search results on popularity field by desc order.
> E.g popularity is field in the index which sto
Hi Midas,
Sort search results on popularity field by desc order.
E.g popularity is field in the index which stores popularity information.
http://localhost:8983/solr/mycollection/select?q=*:*&sort=popularity desc
Thanks,
Rajendra Gaikwad
Please execuse typo
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016, 11:36 AM Mida
Hi Midas,
Sort search results on popularity field by desc order.
E.g popularity is field in the index which stores popularity information.
http://localhost:8983/solr/mycollection/select?q=*:*&sort=popularity desc
Thanks,
Rajendra Gaikwad
Please execuse typo
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016, 11:36 AM Midas
i have n items in my search result with popularity (1,2,3,4n) . I want
higher popularity item should come first then next popularity item
say for example
a) item with popularity n,
b) item with popularity n -1,
c) item with popularity n -2,
d) item with popularity n - 3,
e) item with popular
