On 3/22/2019 2:02 AM, Hubert-Price, Neil wrote:
One other question
Is there a system level configuration that can change the default for the sow=
parameter? Can it be flipped to have the default set to true?
Any parameter can be put into the query handler definition. In
defaults, inva
One other question
Is there a system level configuration that can change the default for the sow=
parameter? Can it be flipped to have the default set to true?
Many Thanks,
Neil
On 22/03/2019, 08:36, "Hubert-Price, Neil" wrote:
Thanks Erick, that makes sense.
However it do
Thanks Erick, that makes sense.
However it does lead me to another conclusion: in Solr prior to 6.0, or with
sow=true on Solr 6.0+ that would mean that the ShingleFilter is totally
ineffective within query analysers. It would be logically equivalent to not
having the ShingleFilter configur
sow was introduced in Solr 6, so it’s just ignored in 4x.
bq. Surely the tokenizer splits on white space anyway, or it wouldn't work?
I didn’t work on that code, so I don’t have the details off the top of my head,
but I’ll take a stab at it as far as my understanding goes. The result is in
your
2HzyvHsdbIW_n0190ofjPS3hAeN
>
> The LargeQueryStructure image shows as single thread with retained set of
4.8GB, with the biggest items being a BooleanWeight object of just over 1.8GB
and a BooleanQuery object of just under 1.8GB
>
> The LargeNumberClauses image shows
age shows as single thread with retained set of
> 4.8GB, with the biggest items being a BooleanWeight object of just over 1.8GB
> and a BooleanQuery object of just under 1.8GB
>
> The LargeNumberClauses image shows a drilldown into the BooleanQuery object,
> where a subquery is
leanWeight object of just over 1.8GB
and a BooleanQuery object of just under 1.8GB
The LargeNumberClauses image shows a drilldown into the BooleanQuery object,
where a subquery is taking around 0.9GB and contains a BooleanClause[524288]
array of clauses (not shown: each of these 524288 is
The Apache mail server aggressively strips attachments, so yours didn’t come
through. People often provide links to images stored somewhere else
As to why this is behaving this way, I’m pretty clueless. A _complete_ shot in
the dark is the query parsing changed its default for split on white
Hello All,
We have a recently upgraded system that went from Solr 4.6 to Solr 7.1 (used as
part of an ecommerce application). In the upgraded version we are seeing
frequent issues with very high Solr memory usage for certain types of query,
but the older 4.6 version does not produce the same r
shuntman
SFhuntman'shuntman
LCFhuntman'shuntman
KSFhuntman'shuntman
BTW, I use Solr 5.3.1
-Original Message-
From: Rick Leir [mailto:rl...@leirtech.com]
Sent: Monday, May 1, 2017 2:19 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: BooleanQuery and WordDelimiterFilter
Avi,
Avi,
Tell us the relevant field types you have in schema.xml.
You can also solve this all for yourself in the Solr Admin Analysis panel.
Cheers -- Rick
On May 1, 2017 2:34:31 AM EDT, Avi Steiner wrote:
>Hi
>
>I have a question regarding the use of query parser and BooleanQuery.
&g
Hi
I have a question regarding the use of query parser and BooleanQuery.
I have 3 documents indexed.
Doc1 contains the words huntman's and huntman
Doc2 contains the word huntman's
Doc3 contains the word huntman
When I search for huntman's I get Doc1 and Doc2
When I search for +
HI Folks,
I am tasked with migrating a Solr app from Solr 4 to Solr 6. This solr app
is in essence a bunch of solr components/handlers. One part that challenges
me is BooleanQuery immutability in Solr 6.
Here is the challenge: In our old code base, we had classes that
implemented custom
Tomoko Uchida wrote
> Hi,
>
> Strictly speaking, MultiPhraseQuery and BooleanQuery wrapping PhraseQuerys
> are not equal.
>
> For each query, Query.rewrite() returns different object. (with Lucene
> 4.10.3)
> q1.rewrite(reader).toString() returns:
> body:&qu
Hi,
Strictly speaking, MultiPhraseQuery and BooleanQuery wrapping PhraseQuerys
are not equal.
For each query, Query.rewrite() returns different object. (with Lucene
4.10.3)
q1.rewrite(reader).toString() returns:
body:"blueberry chocolate (pie tart)", where q1 is your first multi
ph
Any ideas?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/MultiPhraseQuery-Rewrite-to-BooleanQuery-tp4180638p4180820.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ot;pie"), new Term("body", "tart")});
assertEquals(2, searcher.search(q, 1).totalHits);
r.close();
indexStore.close();
I need to know on which phrase query will be match. Explanation doesn't
return exact information, only that is match by this query. So can I rewrit
; >8: 6876651 495118872
> > > org.apache.lucene.index.FieldsReader$LazyField
> > >9: 11354214 363334848
> org.apache.lucene.search.PrefixQuery
> > > 10: 4281624 137011968 java.util.HashMap$Entry
> > > 11: 3466680 832003
java.util.HashMap$Entry
> > 11: 3466680 83200320 org.apache.lucene.search.TermQuery
> > 12: 1987450 79498000 org.apache.lucene.search.PhraseQuery
> > 13:631994 70148624 [Ljava.util.HashMap$Entry;
> > .
> >
> > I have look
1987450 79498000 org.apache.lucene.search.PhraseQuery
> 13:631994 70148624 [Ljava.util.HashMap$Entry;
> .
>
> I have looked at the Solr cache settings multiple times but am not able to
> figure out how/why the high number of BooleanQuery and BooleanClause object
&
Hi Otis,
I was asking about all the reviews for matched hotels. Thanks for your input on
that...
-Ankush
-Original Message-
From: Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 9:50 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: BooleanQuery
All
Thanks Avlesh!
-Original Message-
From: Avlesh Singh [mailto:avl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 7:46 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: BooleanQuery
>
> (+(rev.headline:beach^2.0) | rev.comments:beach^2.0)~0.01 ()) (+
> hot.id:5823 +hot.id:5847
http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: Ankush Goyal
> To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org"
> Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 6:56:44 PM
> Subject: BooleanQuery
>
> Hey Guys,
>
> I have 2 indexes with one having hotel cont
>
> (+(rev.headline:beach^2.0) | rev.comments:beach^2.0)~0.01 ()) (+
> hot.id:5823 +hot.id:5847)
>
Your hot.id's are not OR'd. They are AND'ed. (+hot.id:5823 +hot.id:5847)
should have been (hot.id:5823 hot.id:5847).
Cheers
Avlesh
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 4:26 AM, Ankush Goyal wrote:
> Hey Guys,
Hey Guys,
I have 2 indexes with one having hotel content and other containing reviews for
hotels. When a user queries for a location the logic first calls the hotel
index to get hotels for the location, then it needs to call review index to ask
for all the reviews for all the hotels. So, I need
there was an earlier exception
you aren't showing us, that suggests that the version of the BooleanQuery
class loaded by Solr at runtime isn't the same version it was compiled
against. have you odn't anything funky with your classpath? like swap he
lucene jar in the solr.war, or pu
I am trying to run a very simple query via the Admin interface and
receive the exception below.
The query is:
description_t:guard AND title_t:help
I am using dynamic fields (hence the underscored suffix).
Any ideas?
Thanks in advance
/cody
Nov 19, 2007 3:01:31 PM org.apache.solr.core.SolrE
27 matches
Mail list logo
