are given 0s) / total suggestions displayed ?
>
> If the above is true, wouldn't Selection to Display be binary? I.e. it's
> either 1/# of suggestions displayed (assuming this is a constant) or 0?
>
> Best,
> Audrey
>
>
> __
suggestions displayed (assuming this is a constant) or 0?
>
> Best,
> Audrey
>
>
>
> From: Paras Lehana
> Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2020 2:58:25 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Re: Re: Query Autocomplete Eval
L] Re: Re: Re: Query Autocomplete Evaluation
Hi Audrey,
For MRR, we assume that if a suggestion is selected, it's relevant. It's
also assumed that the user will always click the highest relevant
suggestion. Thus, we calculate position selection for each selection. If
still, I'm not un
tion.
> >> 3. Acceptance Rate or Selection: How many of the total
> searches are
> >> being served from Auto-Suggest. We are around 50%.
> >> 4. Selection to Display Ratio: Did you make the user to
> click any
> >
about
>>Auto-Suggest usage on our platform which becomes apparent if you
>> observe
>>the URL after clicking a suggestion on dir.indiamart.com.
However, not
>>everything would benefit you. Do let me know for any related
query or
on and Response Time are our main KPIs. We track a lot
about
>>Auto-Suggest usage on our platform which becomes apparent if you
>> observe
>>the URL after clicking a suggestion on dir.indiamart.com. However, not
>>everything would benefit you. Do let me kno
t;
>>
>>The Selection and Response Time are our main KPIs. We track a lot about
>>Auto-Suggest usage on our platform which becomes apparent if you
>> observe
>>the URL after clicking a suggestion on dir.indiamart.com. However, not
>>everything
stion on dir.indiamart.com. However, not
> everything would benefit you. Do let me know for any related query or
> explanation. Hope this helps. :)
>
> On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 at 21:23, Audrey Lorberfeld -
> audrey.lorberf...@ibm.com
> wrote:
>
> > Hi a
.com
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> How do you all evaluate the success of your query autocomplete (i.e.
> suggester) component if you use it?
>
> We cannot use MRR for various reasons (I can go into them if you're
> interested), so we're thinki
on on dir.indiamart.com. However, not
everything would benefit you. Do let me know for any related query or
explanation. Hope this helps. :)
On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 at 21:23, Audrey Lorberfeld - audrey.lorberf...@ibm.com
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> How do you all evaluate the success of your quer
Hi all,
How do you all evaluate the success of your query autocomplete (i.e. suggester)
component if you use it?
We cannot use MRR for various reasons (I can go into them if you're
interested), so we're thinking of using nDCG since we already use that for
relevance eval of our s
Hi
I am trying to implement autocomplete feature from two fields, name &
attribute1. I have setup ngram for both the fields and have copyfield that
stores the ngrams results.
fl only contains name which is used by ui.
Is it possible to display records that match on values from attribute1?
community so feel free to ignore / remove if this is
> the incorrect mailing list for this query.
>
> I'm trying to build an autocomplete using a Solr index for addresses in a
> format similar to:
>
> 123 Smith Street, KEMPSEY, NSW 2440
>
> I'm looking to have these ad
Hi All,
I'm new to Solr & the community so feel free to ignore / remove if this is
the incorrect mailing list for this query.
I'm trying to build an autocomplete using a Solr index for addresses in a
format similar to:
123 Smith Street, KEMPSEY, NSW 2440
I'm looking to h
Indeed, you first configure it in the solrconfig.xml ( manually).
Then you can query and parse the response as you like with the SolrJ client
library.
Cheers
-
---
Alessandro Benedetti
Search Consultant, R&D Software Engineer, Director
Sease Ltd. - www.sease.io
--
Sent from: ht
Hi,
Thank you for your help. As far as I understood, I cannot configure and
enable the suggester through solrj client. The configuration should be done
manually.
Arunan
On 18 June 2018 at 14:50, Alessandro Benedetti wrote:
> Hi,
> me and Tommaso contributed this few years ago.[1]
> You can e
Hi,
me and Tommaso contributed this few years ago.[1]
You can easily get the suggester response now from the Solr response.
Of course you need to configure and enable the suggester first.[2][3][4]
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7719
[2] https://sease.io/2015/07/solr-you-complete-m
Hi,
I am trying to upgrade a system which had an older version of Lucene
library. I want to implement AutoCompletion feature using solrj client. In
the earlier version they have used IndexSearcher class of lucene to do
that. Is there any similar way to achieve it using solrj?
I basically want to
.
[1]
https://solr.pl/en/2013/03/25/autocomplete-on-multivalued-fields-using-faceting/
-
---
Alessandro Benedetti
Search Consultant, R&D Software Engineer, Director
Sease Ltd. - www.sease.io
--
Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
Yes, splitting in more documents would probably work.
Don't think I can do this easliy with Solr.
Looking into using facets now.
--
Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
So, your problem is you want to return shingle suggestions from a field in
input but apply multiple filter queries to the documents you want to fetch
suggestions from.
Are you building an auxiliary index for that ?
You need to design it accordingly.
If you want to to map each suggestion to a singl
Can you just add the SingleFilter to your field?
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/6_6/filter-descriptions.html#FilterDescriptions-ShingleFilter
On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 2:04 PM, O. Klein wrote:
> I need to use autocomplete with edismax (ngrams,edgegrams) to return
> sh
I need to use autocomplete with edismax (ngrams,edgegrams) to return shingled
suggestions. Field value "new york city" needs to return on query "ne" ->
"new","new york","new york city". With suggester this is easy. But im forced
to use edismax b
ks, please.
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 2:27 PM, Niraj Aswani
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Mikhali,
> >>
> >> Thank you very much for your quick response.
> >>
> >> This does seem to fix the issue of unordered words in the autoco
, Niraj Aswani wrote:
>
>> Hi Mikhali,
>>
>> Thank you very much for your quick response.
>>
>> This does seem to fix the issue of unordered words in the autocomplete,
>> however, then I loose the capability of matching misspelled words.
>>
>>
very much for your quick response.
>
> This does seem to fix the issue of unordered words in the autocomplete,
> however, then I loose the capability of matching misspelled words.
>
> Is there anything that can be done to combine the functionality of the two?
>
> Regards,
>
Hi Mikhali,
Thank you very much for your quick response.
This does seem to fix the issue of unordered words in the autocomplete,
however, then I loose the capability of matching misspelled words.
Is there anything that can be done to combine the functionality of the two?
Regards,
Niraj
On
On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 11:57 AM, Niraj Aswani wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using solr 5.5.4.
>
> I would like to perform an unordered autocomplete search however it seems
> that it only suggests phrases that start with my term in the query.
>
> For example, in my dictionary I hav
Hi,
I am using solr 5.5.4.
I would like to perform an unordered autocomplete search however it seems
that it only suggests phrases that start with my term in the query.
For example, in my dictionary I have,
*lamp desk*
When searching for the term "lamp", it is able to show the the
Hello, Georg!
Have you seen
http://blog.mikemccandless.com/2014/01/finding-long-tail-suggestions-using.html
?
On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 11:43 PM, Georg Sorst wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> is there a way to get the suggester to autocomplete words and suggest
> co-occurences instead of suggest
://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Georg Sorst wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> is there a way to get the suggester to autocomplete words and suggest
> co-occurences instead of suggesting complete field values? The behavior I'm
> looking for is quite similar to G
Hi all,
is there a way to get the suggester to autocomplete words and suggest
co-occurences instead of suggesting complete field values? The behavior I'm
looking for is quite similar to Google, only based on index values not
actual queries.
Let's say there are two items in the in
d it would always give you the right thing."
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/multiple-but-identical-suggestions-in-autocomplete-tp4220055p4220953.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
> >>> On Oct 28, 2015, at 11:45 AM, Alessandro Benedetti <
> >> abenede...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi guys,
> >>> I was playing with the velocity Browse UI, to provide a simple
> prototype
> >> to
> >>> be sh
t;>
>>> Hi guys,
>>> I was playing with the velocity Browse UI, to provide a simple prototype
>> to
>>> be shown to not techie users.
>>>
>>> Unfortunately I am a super noob in reading/writing front end and Js code.
>>> I would like an
playing with the velocity Browse UI, to provide a simple prototype
> to
> > be shown to not techie users.
> >
> > Unfortunately I am a super noob in reading/writing front end and Js code.
> > I would like an advice from you.
> > What I would like to do is to bypass the
super noob in reading/writing front end and Js code.
> I would like an advice from you.
> What I would like to do is to bypass the big autocomplete script and simply
> automatically call the submit query on each key pressed. ( like google
> instant search) .
>
> it is something
Hi guys,
I was playing with the velocity Browse UI, to provide a simple prototype to
be shown to not techie users.
Unfortunately I am a super noob in reading/writing front end and Js code.
I would like an advice from you.
What I would like to do is to bypass the big autocomplete script and simply
Suggestions)
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > On 14 October 2015 at 05:09, William Bell wrote:
> >
> > > We want to use suggester but also want to show those results closest to
> > my
> > > lat,long... Kinda combine suggester and bq=geodist()
> >
o
> my
> > lat,long... Kinda combine suggester and bq=geodist()
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Salman Ansari
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have been trying to get the autocomplete feature in Solr working with
> > no
> >
t; lat,long... Kinda combine suggester and bq=geodist()
>
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Salman Ansari
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have been trying to get the autocomplete feature in Solr working with
> no
> > luck up to now. First I read that "sugges
We want to use suggester but also want to show those results closest to my
lat,long... Kinda combine suggester and bq=geodist()
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Salman Ansari
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been trying to get the autocomplete feature in Solr working with no
> luck up to
sy to handle it myself as well but I was
just wondering if Solr.NET supports suggest component somehow.
Regards,
Salman
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Alessandro Benedetti <
benedetti.ale...@gmail.com> wrote:
> As Erick suggested you are reading a really old way to provide the
> auto
As Erick suggested you are reading a really old way to provide the
autocomplete feature !
Please take a read to the docs Erick linked and to my blog as well.
It will definitely give you more insight about the Autocomplete world !
Cheers
[1] http://alexbenedetti.blogspot.co.uk/2015/07/solr-you
blog/2015/03/04/solr-suggester/
Best,
Erick
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Salman Ansari wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been trying to get the autocomplete feature in Solr working with no
> luck up to now. First I read that "suggest component" is the recommended
> way as in
Hi,
I have been trying to get the autocomplete feature in Solr working with no
luck up to now. First I read that "suggest component" is the recommended
way as in the below article (and this is the exact functionality I am
looking for, which is to autocomplete multiple w
> > On 09/24/2015 11:18 AM, Andrea Gazzarini wrote:
> >
> >> Hi guys,
> >> as part of a customer requirement, I need to provide an autocomplete /
> >> suggester feature. For that reason I started looking at the Suggester
> >> Component.
> >>
>
art of a customer requirement, I need to provide an autocomplete /
>> suggester feature. For that reason I started looking at the Suggester
>> Component.
>>
>> The target Solr version is not yet determined: I mean, there's another
>> project in production, of the same cus
Sorry, in the first point I meant "prefix_search"
Best,
Andrea
On 09/24/2015 11:18 AM, Andrea Gazzarini wrote:
Hi guys,
as part of a customer requirement, I need to provide an autocomplete /
suggester feature. For that reason I started looking at the Suggester
Component.
The t
Hi guys,
as part of a customer requirement, I need to provide an autocomplete /
suggester feature. For that reason I started looking at the Suggester
Component.
The target Solr version is not yet determined: I mean, there's another
project in production, of the same customer, which is
m/multiple-but-identical-suggestions-in-autocomplete-tp4220055p4220953.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
> Nutch Solr User
>
> "The ultimate search engine would basically understand everything in the
> world, and it would always give you the right thing."
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/multiple-but-identical-suggestions-in
nabble.com/multiple-but-identical-suggestions-in-autocomplete-tp4220055p4220727.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
be read to pull out the stored field and build
> either the FST or the sidecar Lucene index, which can be a _very_
> costly operation (as in minutes/hours for a large dataset).
>
> bq: The requirement is that the autocomplete should be fast (not
> slowdown by the volume of data as da
as in minutes/hours for a large dataset).
bq: The requirement is that the autocomplete should be fast (not
slowdown by the volume of data as dataset become bigger)
Well, in some alternate universe this may be possible. But the larger
the corpus the slower the processing will be, there's just no
Thank you Eric,
I would like to implement an autocomplete for large dataset. The
autocomplete should show the phrase or the question the user want as the
user types. The requirement is that the autocomplete should be fast (not
slowdown by the volume of data as dataset become bigger), and easy to
Not really. There's no need to use ngrams as the article suggests if the
terms component does what you need. Which is why I asked you about what
autocomplete means in your context. Which you have not clarified. Have you
even looked at terms component? Especially the terms.prefix option?
Thank you Eric for your reply.
If I understand it seems that these approaches are using index to hold
terms. As the index grows bigger, it can be a performance issues.
Is it right? Please can you check this article
<http://www.norconex.com/serving-autocomplete-suggestions-fast/> to see
what
Well, defining what you mean by "autocomplete" would be a start. If it's just
a user types some letters and you suggest the next N terms in the list,
TermsComponent will fix you right up.
If it's more complicated, the AutoSuggest functionality might help.
If it's correct
Hi,
I am looking for a fast and easy to maintain way to do autocomplete for
large dataset in solr. I heard about Ternary Search Tree (TST)
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ternary_search_tree>.
But I would like to know if there is something I missed such as best
practice, Solr new featur
Hello Guys,
I use SOLR 5.2.1 and the relatively new solr.SuggestComponent. It worked
fine at the beginning. I use this function to auto-complete the publisher
names. I have 3000 documents and 80 publishers. When I use the autocomplete
feature and I get back the name of the publishers matched as
Hi solrExperts,
Need autocomplete on whole phrase for multiple words .
When I typed *br, *the results are brad , brad pitt but I need only brad
pitt to come.
I’m using shinglefilterfactory + terms component for autocomplete feature ,
the query is something like
http://localhost:8080/solr
out one of my problems i.e. I was using the
Search field that had been stemmed. I will look at creating an alternate
field just for the suggester. Thank you.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Suggester-Autocomplete-Working-Example-tp4183493p4183532.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
searching and which has been stemmed. I need to look into setting up another
field for the suggester. I will post here when I have questions about this.
Thanks again.
Michael Sokolov-3 wrote
> Please go ahead and play with autocomplete on safaribooksonline.com/home
> - if you are
On 2 February 2015 at 11:26, O. Olson wrote:
> I also know that I do not have the
> capability to do a lot of customizations to Solr that are much beyond the
> defaults and changing a few settings.
Actually, you have a capability to do unbelievable level of
customization in Solr, starting from sc
Please go ahead and play with autocomplete on safaribooksonline.com/home
- if you are not a subscriber you will have to sign up for a free
trial. We use the AnalyzingInfixSuggester. From your description, it
sounds as if you are building completions from a field that you also use
for
Hi,
I'm am wondering if anyone can point me to a website that user Solr's
Suggester or Autocomplete or whatever you call it. I am looking for
something that is closer to the default provided in the examples, but is
also used commercially.
I have a local Solr installati
Still not able to get my autoComplete component to work in a distributed
environment. Works fine on a non-distributed system. Also, on the distributed
system, if I include distrib=false, it works.
I have tried shards.qt and shards parameters, but they make no difference. I
should add, I am
On 1/1/2015 1:09 PM, Meraj A. Khan wrote:
> When running SolrCloud do you even have to include the shards parameter
> ,shouldnt only shards.qt parameter suffice?
If you are using SolrCloud, no shards parameter is required ... all
queries sent to either the collection or any shard replica will
auto
Shawn,
When running SolrCloud do you even have to include the shards parameter
,shouldnt only shards.qt parameter suffice?
On Dec 30, 2014 7:17 PM, "Shawn Heisey" wrote:
> On 12/30/2014 5:03 PM, Charles Sanders wrote:
> > Thanks for the suggestion.
> >
> > I did not do that originally because th
Got it. Thanks for your help everyone.
- Original Message -
From: "Shawn Heisey"
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 7:16:59 PM
Subject: Re: SpellCheck (AutoComplete) Not Working In Distributed Environment
On 12/30/2014 5:03 PM, Charles San
On 12/30/2014 5:03 PM, Charles Sanders wrote:
> Thanks for the suggestion.
>
> I did not do that originally because the documentation states:
> This parameter is not required for the /select request handler.
>
> Which is what I am using. But I gave it a go, even though I'm not certain of
> th
ction.java:66)\n\tat
org.eclipse.jetty.server.bio.SocketConnector$ConnectorEndPoint.run(SocketConnector.java:254)\n\tat
org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool.runJob(QueuedThreadPool.java:599)\n\tat
org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool$3.run(QueuedThreadPool.java:534)\n\tat
java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744)\n
gt;
>
>
> explicit
> 10
> allText
>
> true
> andreasAutoComplete
> true
> 5
> true
> 5
>
>
> autoComplete
>
>
>
>
>
> andreasAutoComplete
> org.apache.solr.spelling.suggest.Suggester
> name="lookupImpl">org.apache
nal I must do to get
this to work in a distributed environment?
explicit
10
allText
true
andreasAutoComplete
true
5
true
5
autoComplete
andreasAutoComplete
org.apache.solr.spelling.suggest.Suggester
org.apache.solr.spelling.suggest.tst.TSTLookupFactory
sugg_al
ot.com/blog/post/Advanced-autocomplete-with-Solr-Ngrams-and-Twitters-typeaheadjs.aspx).
Compared to how you can analyze search result through the Solr backend,
the analysis of suggester results seems to be sorely lacking.
Am 10.11.2014 14:37 schrieb Michael Sokolov:
> The goal is to ensure that sugge
It wouldn’t be easy if in the site you’ll ensure that only terms are submitted
to the actual search? In app I worked some time ago the default behavior of the
Javascript component used for autocompletion was to first autocomplete the term
in the input and then submit the query against the
The goal is to ensure that suggestions from autocomplete are actually
terms in the main index, so that the suggestions will actually result in
matches. You've considered expanding the main index by adding the
suggestion n-grams to it, but it would probably be better to alter your
suggest
We're using Solr as a backend for an ECommerce site/system. The Solr
index stores products with selected attributes, as well as a dedicated
field for autocomplete suggestions (Done via AJAX request when typing in
the search box without pressing return).
The autosuggest field is suppli
gt;
>
> *solrconfig.xml*
>
> requestHandler name="typeahead" class="solr.SearchHandler">
>
> json
> 10
> true
> autosuggest
> AND
>
> name_s,pk_id,city_s,state_s,country_s
>
>
> kindly provide your suggestions to achieve this.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Exact-matches-are-not-coming-on-Top-for-autocomplete-search-results-tp4163162.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> replacement="$1" replace="all"/>
>
>
>
>
> multiValued="true"/>
>
> *solrconfig.xml*
>
> requestHandler name="typeahead" class="solr.SearchHandler">
>
> json
> 10
> true
;>
json
10
true
autosuggest
AND
name_s,pk_id,city_s,state_s,country_s
kindly provide your suggestions to achieve this.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Exact-matches-are-not-coming-on-Top-for-autocomplete-search-results-tp4163162.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
estHandler name="typeahead" class="solr.SearchHandler">
json
10
true
autosuggest
AND
name_s,pk_id,city_s,state_s,country_s
kindly provide your suggestions to achieve this.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Exact-matches-are-not-comi
le/n4131663/analysis.png>;
>>
>> Dmitry Kan-2 wrote
>> > Could you show the updated field definition?
>> > Does analysis page show sensible output for your query on
>> > indexing/querying
>> > sides?
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed,
t; sides?
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 5:52 PM, Sunayana <
>
> > sunayana.02@
>
> > > wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks for replying,
> >> 1.Yes,I re-indexed data after the changes.
> >> 2.Changing to STF, did not help..
>
gt;>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Autocomplete-with-Case-insensitive-feature-tp4131182p4131499.html
>> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Dmitry
> Blog:
not help..
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Autocomplete-with-Case-insensitive-feature-tp4131182p4131499.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
Dmitry
Blog: http://dmitrykan.blogspot.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/dmitrykan
Thanks for replying,
1.Yes,I re-indexed data after the changes.
2.Changing to STF, did not help..
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Autocomplete-with-Case-insensitive-feature-tp4131182p4131499.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
aseFilterFactory"/>
>
>
>
>
>
> This did not work out for me.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Autocomplete-with-Case-insensitive-feature-tp4131182p4131198.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
Dmitry
Blog: http://dmitrykan.blogspot.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/dmitrykan
This did not work out for me.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Autocomplete-with-Case-insensitive-feature-tp4131182p4131198.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list
Hi,
Configure LowerCaseFilterFactory into the "query" side of your type config.
Dmitry
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Sunayana wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have been trying out this autocomplete feature in Solr4.7.1 using
> Suggester.I have configured it to disp
Hi All,
I have been trying out this autocomplete feature in Solr4.7.1 using
Suggester.I have configured it to display phrase suggestions also.Problem is
If I type "game" I get suggestions as "game" or phrases containing "game".
But If I type "Game" *no s
between specific timestamp and by username fields for
autocomplete by field content/content_autosuggest.
I need to autocomplete word "google" between 2013-01-01T00:00:00Z and
2013-12-31T23:59:59Z for username "John" when i type "goo"
IS IT PO
Thanks for the quick response,
I have configured suggest and its working great but its searching all the
documents.
From my field definition:
I need to search between specific timestamp and by username fields for
autocomplete by field content/content_autosuggest.
I need to autocomplete
ew to solr, Is it possible to accomplish autocomplete through ( Terms or
Suggest or Facet ) over a date range.
I need to have a autocomplete over a field between a date range from another
field.
Thanks
newbie
Hi,
I am new to solr, Is it possible to accomplish autocomplete through ( Terms or
Suggest or Facet ) over a date range.
I need to have a autocomplete over a field between a date range from another
field.
Thanks
newbie
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Spell+Checking
[2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Velocity+Search+UI
2013/9/27 Otis Gospodnetic
> Hi,
>
> Not sure if Solr suggester can do this (can it, anyone?), but...
> shameless plug... I know
> http://sematext.com/p
:28
Asunto: Re: Implementing Solr Suggester for Autocomplete (multiple columns)
Actually I don't use that field, it could be used to do some form of basic
collaborative filtering, so you could use a high value for items in your
collection that you want to come first, but in my case
l -
De: "JMill"
Para: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Enviados: Viernes, 27 de Septiembre 2013 16:19:40
Asunto: Re: Implementing Solr Suggester for Autocomplete (multiple columns)
I am not sure about the value to use for the option "popularity". Is there
a method or do you just go w
perhaps you could create a PR to
that Github repository, son it will be in sync with current versions of
Solr.
>
> - Mensaje original -
> De: "JMill"
> Para: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Enviados: Jueves, 26 de Septiembre 2013 9:10:49
> Asunto: Re: Implementi
1 - 100 of 369 matches
Mail list logo
