On 11/14/2018 10:35 AM, Jon Kjær Amundsen wrote:
It is not that I want it.
I just can't reproduce it even though I read it as an expected behaviour.
So I wondered if something has been changed since the warning was written,
or if I had misunderstood something.
To my knowledge, nothing has chan
It is not that I want it.
I just can't reproduce it even though I read it as an expected behaviour.
So I wondered if something has been changed since the warning was written,
or if I had misunderstood something.
ons. d. 14. nov. 2018 17.09 skrev Erick Erickson :
> I'm a little confused on what y
I'm a little confused on what you're trying. Say your source field is
Y and your destination field X. Are you saying that you want your
destination field X to contain both the old value of field Y and the
new value of field Y when you atomically update that field Y?
H, I'm actually not sure wh
Reading up on atomic updates, the Solr reference guide states the following:
The core functionality of atomically updating a document requires that all
fields in your schema must be configured as stored (stored="true") or
docValues (docValues="true") except for fields which are
destinations, whic
