Field with store=true has the downside of disk space. Your index will grow in
space requirements.
Maybe update the whole document can be an option ...
—
/Yago Riveiro
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Rahul Bhooteshwar
wrote:
> Hi Yago Riveiro,
> Thanks for your quick reply. I am usin
Hi Yago Riveiro,
Thanks for your quick reply. I am using Solr for faceted search using *Solr**j.
*I am using facet queries and filter queries. I am new to Solr so I would
like to know what is the best practice to handle such scenarios.
Thanks and Regards,
Rahul Bhooteshwar
Enterprise Software Engi
"Which means I have to change all my fields to stored=”true” if I want to
use atomic update.Right?”
Yes, and re-index all your data.
"Will it affect the performance of the Solr?”
What type of queries are you doing now?
—
/Yago Riveiro
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 12:05 PM, Rahul Bhootesh
Hi,
I have around 50 fields in my schema and having 20 fields are stored=”true”
and rest of them stored=”false”
In case partial update (atomic update), it is mentioned at many places
that the fields in schema should have stored=”true”. I have also tried
atomic update on documents having fields wit
