Have you considered query-time expansion rather than index-time expansion?
In general this will lead to more complex queries, but smaller indexes.
Take a look at the analysis page available from the admin page to see exactly
what happens.
What is the high-legel problem you're trying to solve? Hav
> Is there a way where in I can apply all those file to same
> tag with some
> delimiter separated?
>
> like this:
> class="solr.SynonymFilterFactory"
> synonyms="BODYTaxonomy.txt
> , ClinicalObs.txt, MicTaxo.txt, SPTaxo.txt"
> ignoreCase="true"
> expand="true"/>
Yes, you can perfectly
crease-the-data-size-from-MB-to-GBs-tp3028700p3028877.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I have the flat files (synonym text files) each upto 200kb. Integrationg
all of them increased the txt file size to huge. And I wanted to maintain
them separately. So in order to apply all those synonyms to same field type
I created that many filter tags for respective synonym txt files.
Is it
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 10:34 AM, rajini maski wrote:
> Applying synonyms increased the data size from 28 mb to 10.3 gb
>
> Before enabling synonyms to the a field , the data size was 28mb. Now ,
> after applying synonyms I see that data folder size has increased to 10.3
> gb.
>
> Attached is sc
Applying synonyms increased the data size from 28 mb to 10.3 gb
Before enabling synonyms to the a field , the data size was 28mb. Now ,
after applying synonyms I see that data folder size has increased to 10.3
gb.
Attached is schema field type for that field:
