riteria that contains the
> word popularity So we would have to use *sort* to order the documents.
>
> if we say, boosting has no or almost no effect if we use sort, then whats
> the contradiction story between *sort* and *boost*
>
> :-) would be interesting to know the answer
&g
text:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Applying-boosting-for-keyword-search-tp4137523p4138241.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi Jack,
Thank you for the suggestions. :-)
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Applying-boosting-for-keyword-search-tp4137523p4138239.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
is.
> Sometimes you have to experiment with the boost factor.
>
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> -Original Message- From: manju16832003
> Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2014 12:37 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Applying boosting for keyword search
>
>
Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: manju16832003
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2014 12:37 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Applying boosting for keyword search
Hi Jack,
Thanks for your help.
I do not want to boost *keyword* field. I apply full text search no keyword
field and b
hout keyword, I only have issue having keyword
search.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Applying-boosting-for-keyword-search-tp4137523p4137528.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Applying boosting for keyword search
HI,
I have a scenario where by I apply boosting in the following two cases
- Usual search, by user selection
- Keyword search. I have a field *keyword* that is copy/combination of many
fields
When user does the usual query, my boosting works fines
ured:true^100
Keyword and boosting done with *q* param.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Applying-boosting-for-keyword-search-tp4137523.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
