: Interesting, omitTf=true eventhough it would give strict enforcement,
: wouldnt it affect the relevancy? Like, I am wondering if the ordering
: amongst the three word matches would be not as good as it would be when we
: have omitNorms=true&omitTf=true. Do you have an idea?
It will *absolutely*
Interesting, omitTf=true eventhough it would give strict enforcement,
wouldnt it affect the relevancy? Like, I am wondering if the ordering
amongst the three word matches would be not as good as it would be when we
have omitNorms=true&omitTf=true. Do you have an idea?
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 8:51
: I want to have a strick enforcement that In case of a 3 word search, those
: results that match all 3 term should be presented ahead of those that match
: 2 terms when I set mm=2.
:
: I have seen quite some cases where, those results that match 2 out of 3
: words appear ahead of those matching
12 10:54 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: And results before Or results
I vaguely recall seeing this situation myself a couple of years ago. I think
it was because there were multiple occurrences of the pair of terms in a
single document vs. a lesser number of occurrences of all thre
-
From: Ahmet Arslan
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2012 3:31 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: And results before Or results
I want to have a strick enforcement
that In case of a 3 word search, those
results that match all 3 term should be presented ahead of
those that match
2 terms when I
> I want to have a strick enforcement
> that In case of a 3 word search, those
> results that match all 3 term should be presented ahead of
> those that match
> 2 terms when I set mm=2.
>
> I have seen quite some cases where, those results that match
> 2 out of 3
> words appear ahead of those matc
iday, May 11, 2012 11:03 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: And results before Or results
>
>
> Sure but it doesnt seem to be doing a strict enforcement.
>
> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Jack Krupansky
> **wrote:
>
> If you simply "OR&q
more terms matching higher.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message- From: Karthick Duraisamy Soundararaj
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2012 10:44 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: And results before Or results
Lets say I have a query like "A B C". I want all the results that have
t; more terms matching higher.
>
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> -Original Message- From: Karthick Duraisamy Soundararaj
> Sent: Friday, May 11, 2012 10:44 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: And results before Or results
>
> Lets say I have a query like &quo
, May 11, 2012 10:44 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: And results before Or results
Lets say I have a query like "A B C". I want all the results that have "A B
and C" in them ahead of "A B" or "B C" or any combination of them.
My rule is this:
ulate that in the Lucene/SOlr query parser by "OR"ing in the
phrases with boost factors.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Karthick Duraisamy Soundararaj
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2012 10:44 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: And results before Or results
Let
11 matches
Mail list logo
