Hi Erick,
On 03/12/10 17:09, Erick Erickson wrote:
> << of my fields does not have any analyzers defined at all, and it's
> working fine without problems.>>>
>
> Field or fieldType?
...one of my fields with a fieldtype that does not have any analyzer
defined at all, ... ;-)
>
> << So, it must
<<>>
Field or fieldType?
<< So, it must be possible to define field
type without specifying any analyzers. >>
Truth to tell, I don't know off the top of my head
what happens if you define no analyzer for a fieldType.
I think it would be bad practice anyway, *I* want to *know*
what indexing and a
Hi Erick,
thank you very much for your help. What's confusing me is that another
of my fields does not have any analyzers defined at all, and it's
working fine without problems. So, it must be possible to define field
type without specifying any analyzers. I don't understand why it
shouldn't be po
Well, what would you have SOLR do that makes sense if you
don't define a query analyzer? Very very strange things
happen if you use different analyzers for indexing
and querying. At least defaulting that way has a *chance* of
giving expected results...
Why not use, say, KeywordTokenizerFactory if
Hi all,
I have a field with some kind of category tree as a string. The format
is like this:
"prefix>first>second#prefix>otherfirst>othersecond"
So, the document is categorized in two categories, separated by '#', and
all categories start with the same prefix which I don't want to use.
F
