Re: Allow Join over two sharded collection

This doesn't appear to be being actively pursued, so it's anybody's guess. Depending on your use-case, the streaming capabilities may be an OOB solution. Best, Erick On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 1:22 AM mganeshs wrote: > > All, > > Any idea, whether this will be taken care or addressed in near future

Re: Allow Join over two sharded collection

All, Any idea, whether this will be taken care or addressed in near future ? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8297 Regards, -- Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html

Re: Allow Join over two sharded collection

eature will be in place ? > > Regards, > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3. > nabble.com/Allow-Join-over-two-sharded-collection-tp4343443p4344098.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >

Re: Allow Join over two sharded collection

ture will be in place ? Regards, -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Allow-Join-over-two-sharded-collection-tp4343443p4344098.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Allow Join over two sharded collection

to for time based implicit routing is that, >>> all >>>> documents will end up with recent shard and so indexing will be heavy >>> for >>>> the new shard, where as older shards will be used just for query >>> purpose. >>>> If we have default sharding, then load for indexing is distributed >>> across >>>> all the shards. That's the reason we would like to stick to default >>>> sharding. But Join is the issue over here when default sharding is used >>> :-( >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble >>> .com/Allow-Join-over-two-sharded-collection-tp4343443p4343803.html >>>> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> >> >>

Re: Allow Join over two sharded collection

based implicit routing is that, >> all >> > documents will end up with recent shard and so indexing will be heavy >> for >> > the new shard, where as older shards will be used just for query >> purpose. >> > If we have default sharding, then load for indexin

Re: Allow Join over two sharded collection

where as older shards will be used just for query purpose. > > If we have default sharding, then load for indexing is distributed across > > all the shards. That's the reason we would like to stick to default > > sharding. But Join is the issue over here when default sha

Re: Allow Join over two sharded collection

eason we would like to stick to default > sharding. But Join is the issue over here when default sharding is used :-( > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Allow-Join-over-two-sharded-collection-tp4343443p4343803.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Allow Join over two sharded collection

in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Allow-Join-over-two-sharded-collection-tp4343443p4343803.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Allow Join over two sharded collection

> > > > > > -- > > View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3. > > nabble.com/Allow-Join-over-two-sharded-collection-tp4343443.html > > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > > > -- > Sincerely yours > Mikhail Khludnev >

Re: Allow Join over two sharded collection

comments says by SOLR 7.0. Can we expect that by 7.0 ? > > Regards, > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3. > nabble.com/Allow-Join-over-two-sharded-collection-tp4343443.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > -- Sincerely yours Mikhail Khludnev

Re: Allow Join over two sharded collection

more. and for every change in ACL or its permission we don't want to > re-index the real document as well. > > Do you think is there any better alternative ? or the way we have kept ACLs > are wrong ? > > Regards, > > > > -- > View this message in context: ht

Re: Allow Join over two sharded collection

? or the way we have kept ACLs are wrong ? Regards, -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Allow-Join-over-two-sharded-collection-tp4343443p4343582.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Allow Join over two sharded collection

e of the comments says by SOLR 7.0. Can we expect that by 7.0 ? > > Regards, > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Allow-Join-over-two-sharded-collection-tp4343443.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Allow Join over two sharded collection

066.n3.nabble.com/Allow-Join-over-two-sharded-collection-tp4343443.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.