Are you looking at 8466 or 8096? The patch on 8466 is the one I'm
referencing. I should remove the other as it is more change than I think
should be done for this ticket.
Jamie
On Jan 3, 2016 8:47 PM, "William Bell" wrote:
> Ok the path appears to have dv and uif in there.?
>
> On Sun, Jan 3,
Ok the path appears to have dv and uif in there.?
On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 4:40 PM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
> The patch adds facet.method=uif and then delegates all of the work to the
> JSON Faceting API to do the work. I had originally added a facet.method=dv
> and made the original facet.method=fc
The patch adds facet.method=uif and then delegates all of the work to the
JSON Faceting API to do the work. I had originally added a facet.method=dv
and made the original facet.method=fc work using the UnInvertedField but
wanted to avoid making a change that would introduce unexpected behavior.
Wh
Interesting that facet.method=dv or facet.method=uif. What is the
difference?
On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 6:44 AM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
> For those interested I created a separate jira issue for this but forgot to
> attach earlier.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8466
> On Jan 2, 2016
For those interested I created a separate jira issue for this but forgot to
attach earlier.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8466
On Jan 2, 2016 8:45 PM, "William Bell" wrote:
> Yes we would like backward compatibility. We cannot switch all the facet
> fields to DocValues and our facet
Yes we would like backward compatibility. We cannot switch all the facet
fields to DocValues and our faceting is slow.
Please...
On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 7:41 AM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
> Is there any interest in this? While i think it's important and inline
> with faceting available in the new js
Is there any interest in this? While i think it's important and inline
with faceting available in the new json facet api, I've seen no discussion
on it so I'm wondering if it's best I add support for this using a custom
facet component even though the majority of the component will be a copy
which
I had previously piggybacked on another post, but I think it may have been
lost there. I had a need to do UnInvertedField based faceting in the
FacetsComponent and as such started looking at what would be required to
implement something similar to what the JSON Facets based API does in this
regard
