Hi Chris,
that's even more cloak-and-dagger... In the meantime we edited out index and
use a unix timestamp, that's working without any problems :-)
Thanks for your help and have a nice day,
Christian
: - "date:[2005-01-01T00:00:00Z TO NOW]" or "date:[2005-01-01T00:00:00Z TO
2008-09-18T09:45:00Z]": 1 and 2 (incorrect)
: - "date:[2005-01-01T00:00:00Z TO 20080918T09:45:00Z]": 1, 2, 3 (correct)
: - "date:[2005-01-01T00:00:00Z TO 2007-12-31T23:59:59Z]": only 1 (incorrect)
: - "date:[2005-01-01T00:
e FAQ. :)
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: Kolodziej Christian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org"
> Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 3:56:55 AM
> Subject: AW: Date field mystery
>
Hi Chris,
it was a long night for our solr server today because we rebuilt the complete
index using "well formed" date string. And the date field is stored now so that
we can see if there went something wrong :-)
But our problems are solved completely. Now I can give you a very exact
descripti
Hi Eric,
>The guys who really know will be able to provide you much better
>feedback if you include:
>your field definitions
I hope, the following fields are enough.
>probably your locale settings.
The standard locale is en_US UTF8 and java doesn't seem to use another local
