uot; instead of creating a
> new ArrayList
Will do that, allthough I am not hunting for nano's, at least not at the moment
;)
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Shawn Heisey [mailto:apa...@elyograg.org]
Gesendet: Montag, 22. Februar 2016 15:57
An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Betreff
On 2/22/2016 1:55 AM, Clemens Wyss DEV wrote:
> SolrClient solrClient = getSolrClient( coreName, true );
> Collection batch = new ArrayList();
> while ( elements.hasNext() )
> {
> IIndexableElement elem = elements.next();
> SolrInputDocument doc = createSolrDocForElement( elem, provider, locale
> solrClient.add( documents ); // [2]
is of course:
solrClient.add( batch ); // [2]
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Clemens Wyss DEV [mailto:clemens...@mysign.ch]
Gesendet: Montag, 22. Februar 2016 09:55
An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Betreff: AW: AW: OutOfMemory when batchupdating f
Find attached the relevant part of the batch-update:
...
SolrClient solrClient = getSolrClient( coreName, true );
Collection batch = new ArrayList();
while ( elements.hasNext() )
{
IIndexableElement elem = elements.next();
SolrInputDocument doc = createSolrDocForElement( elem, provider, locale
