j...@basetechnology.com>wrote:
> >
> >> What does your field type analyzer look like?
> >>
> >> I suspect that you have a stop filter which cause "and" to be removed.
> >>
> >> -- Jack Krupansky
> >>
> >> -Original
>
> > On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 11:09 PM, Jack Krupansky <
> j...@basetechnology.com>wrote:
> >
> >> What does your field type analyzer look like?
> >>
> >> I suspect that you have a stop filter which cause "and" to be removed.
> &g
>> I suspect that you have a stop filter which cause "and" to be removed.
>>
>> -- Jack Krupansky
>>
>> -Original Message- From: abhishek jain Sent: Tuesday, March 25,
>> 2014 1:29 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: AND not as a
>&
er which cause "and" to be removed.
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> -Original Message- From: abhishek jain Sent: Tuesday, March 25,
> 2014 1:29 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: AND not as a
> boolean operator in Phrase
> hi friends,
>
> when i sear
Better to user '+A +B' rather than AND/OR, see:
http://searchhub.org/2011/12/28/why-not-and-or-and-not/
François
On Mar 25, 2014, at 10:21 PM, Koji Sekiguchi wrote:
> (2014/03/26 2:29), abhishek jain wrote:
>> hi friends,
>>
>> when i search for "A and B" it gives me result for A , B
(2014/03/26 2:29), abhishek jain wrote:
hi friends,
when i search for "A and B" it gives me result for A , B , i am not sure
why?
Please guide how can i exact match when it is within phrase/quotes.
Generally speaking (w/ LuceneQParser), if you want phrase match results,
use quotes, i.e. q="A
What does your field type analyzer look like?
I suspect that you have a stop filter which cause "and" to be removed.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: abhishek jain
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2014 1:29 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: AND not as a boolea
hi friends,
when i search for "A and B" it gives me result for A , B , i am not sure
why?
Please guide how can i exact match when it is within phrase/quotes.
--
Thanks and kind Regards,
Abhishek jain
