/lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/A-feature-idea-for-discussion-fields-that-can-only-be-explicitly-retrieved-tp4313890p4314288.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
bq: Is my understanding about stored fields correct, that even if excluded
from fl, the data on the disk for a given field would still be read as
part of decompression..
Assuming any stored field (NOT docvalues) was read then this is, indeed,
correct. To be pedantic about it, enough 16K blocks wil
On 13 January 2017 at 14:40, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> What if there were a schema option that would skip docValue retrieval
> for a field unless the fl parameter were to *explicitly* ask for that
> field? With a typical wildcard value in fl, fields with this option
> enabled would not be retrieved.
On 1/13/2017 1:02 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> What about using the defaults in requestHandlers along with SOLR-3191
> to accomplish this? Let's say that there was an fl-exclusion
> parameter. Now you'd be able to define an exclusion default that would
> exclude your field(s) unless overridden in yo
What about using the defaults in requestHandlers
along with SOLR-3191 to accomplish this? Let's
say that there was an fl-exclusion parameter. Now
you'd be able to define an exclusion default that
would exclude your field(s) unless overridden in your
request handler. This could be either a default o
I've got an idea for a feature that I think could be very useful. I'd
like to get some community feedback about it, see whether it's worth
opening an issue for discussion.
First, some background info:
As I understand it, the fact that stored fields are compressed means
that even if a particular
