gt; > Sent: Monday 16th July 2018 13:39
> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: 7.3 appears to leak
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > we noticed the same problems here in a rather small setup. 40.000
> metadata documents with nearly as much files that have „l
Solr instances? Or
is your Solr a 100 % official build?
Thanks,
Markus
-Original message-
> From:Thomas Scheffler
> Sent: Monday 16th July 2018 13:39
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: 7.3 appears to leak
>
> Hi,
>
> we noticed the same problem
in, probably
> next week or so.
>
> Many thanks,
> Markus
>
>
> -Original message-
>> From:Kydryavtsev Andrey
>> Sent: Wednesday 4th July 2018 14:48
>> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: 7.3 appears to leak
>>
>> If it
Hello Andrey,
I didn't think of that! I will try it when i have the courage again, probably
next week or so.
Many thanks,
Markus
-Original message-
> From:Kydryavtsev Andrey
> Sent: Wednesday 4th July 2018 14:48
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: 7.
message-
>> From:Erick Erickson
>> Sent: Friday 29th June 2018 19:34
>> To: solr-user
>> Subject: Re: 7.3 appears to leak
>>
>> This is truly puzzling then, I'm clueless. It's hard to imagine this
>> is lurking out there and nobody el
To: solr-user
> Subject: Re: 7.3 appears to leak
>
> This is truly puzzling then, I'm clueless. It's hard to imagine this
> is lurking out there and nobody else notices, but you've eliminated
> the custom code. And this is also very peculiar:
>
> * it occurs only
an, how could those leak a
> SolrIndexSearcher?
>
> Let me know :)
>
> Many thanks!
> Markus
>
> -Original message-
>> From:Erick Erickson
>> Sent: Friday 29th June 2018 18:46
>> To: solr-user
>> Subject: Re: 7.3 appears to leak
>>
xSearcher?
Let me know :)
Many thanks!
Markus
-Original message-
> From:Erick Erickson
> Sent: Friday 29th June 2018 18:46
> To: solr-user
> Subject: Re: 7.3 appears to leak
>
> bq. The only custom stuff left is an extension of SearchHandler that
> only writes numFo
cally still not reproducible.
>
> So, what is next? I have no clues left.
>
> Many, many thanks,
> Markus
>
> -Original message-
>> From:Markus Jelsma
>> Sent: Thursday 28th June 2018 23:52
>> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>> Subject: RE:
--Original message-
> From:Markus Jelsma
> Sent: Thursday 28th June 2018 23:52
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: 7.3 appears to leak
>
> Hello Yonik,
>
> If leaking a whole SolrIndexSearcher would cause this problem, then the only
> custom componen
only serves
shard queries.
I will get back to this topic tomorrow!
Many thanks,
Markus
-Original message-
> From:Yonik Seeley
> Sent: Thursday 28th June 2018 23:30
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: 7.3 appears to leak
>
> > * SortedIntDocSet instan
> * SortedIntDocSet instances ánd ConcurrentLRUCache$CacheEntry instances are
> both leaked on commit;
If these are actually filterCache entries being leaked, it stands to
reason that a whole searcher is being leaked somewhere.
-Yonik
ving this. So what next? I need the
list's help to find the leak.
So please, thanks,
Markus
-Original message-
> From:Shalin Shekhar Mangar
> Sent: Friday 27th April 2018 12:11
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: 7.3 appears to leak
>
> Hi Markus,
Đạt Cao Mạnh
> > Sent: Monday 30th April 2018 4:07
> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: 7.3 appears to leak
> >
> > Hi Markus,
> >
> > I tried indexing documents and query documents with queries and filter
> > question, but can
it again, we can rule
stuff out and hopefully get back at you guys!
Thanks,
Markus
-Original message-
> From:Đạt Cao Mạnh
> Sent: Monday 30th April 2018 4:07
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: 7.3 appears to leak
>
> Hi Markus,
>
> I tried inde
Hi Markus,
I tried indexing documents and query documents with queries and filter
question, but can't not find any leak problems. Can you give us more
information about the leak?
Thanks!
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 5:11 PM Shalin Shekhar Mangar <
shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Markus,
>
> Can
Hi Markus,
Can you give an idea of what your filter queries look like? Any custom
plugins or things we should be aware of? Simple indexing artificial docs,
querying and committing doesn't seem to reproduce the issue for me.
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 10:13 PM, Markus Jelsma
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We
Hello,
We just finished upgrading our three separate clusters from 7.2.1 to 7.3, which
went fine, except for our main text search collection, it appears to leak
memory on commit!
After initial upgrade we saw the cluster slowly starting to run out of memory
within about an hour and a half. We i
18 matches
Mail list logo