Hi Jan,
In Solr 1.3 we used that format. I'll give it a go
Thx
On Friday, January 20, 2012, Jan Høydahl wrote:
> Shouldn't it be literal.uid=foo, not ext.literal.uid ??
>
> --
> Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
> Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
> Solr Training - www.solrtraining.com
>
>
Shouldn't it be literal.uid=foo, not ext.literal.uid ??
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
Solr Training - www.solrtraining.com
On 19. jan. 2012, at 23:08, Wayne W wrote:
> HI,
>
> I'm trying to setup the latest version of Solr. Currently we're
> running
HI,
I'm trying to setup the latest version of Solr. Currently we're
running 1.3 so we're a bit out of date!
Having trouble setting up the tika/extractionhandler jars etc, but I
think I'm nearly there. However I've got this stack trace, thats
complaining about a required field missing. However as
