Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Query Autocomplete Evaluation

2020-02-28 Thread Audrey Lorberfeld - audrey.lorberf...@ibm.com
are given 0s) / total suggestions displayed ? > > If the above is true, wouldn't Selection to Display be binary? I.e. it's > either 1/# of suggestions displayed (assuming this is a constant) or 0? > > Best, > Audrey > > > __

Re: Re: Re: Re: Query Autocomplete Evaluation

2020-02-28 Thread Paras Lehana
suggestions displayed (assuming this is a constant) or 0? > > Best, > Audrey > > > > From: Paras Lehana > Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2020 2:58:25 AM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Re: Re: Query Autocomplete Eval

Re: Re: Re: Re: Query Autocomplete Evaluation

2020-02-27 Thread Audrey Lorberfeld - audrey.lorberf...@ibm.com
, wouldn't Selection to Display be binary? I.e. it's either 1/# of suggestions displayed (assuming this is a constant) or 0? Best, Audrey From: Paras Lehana Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2020 2:58:25 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: [EXTERNA

Re: Re: Re: Query Autocomplete Evaluation

2020-02-26 Thread Paras Lehana
Hi Audrey, For MRR, we assume that if a suggestion is selected, it's relevant. It's also assumed that the user will always click the highest relevant suggestion. Thus, we calculate position selection for each selection. If still, I'm not understanding your question correctly, feel free to contact

Re: Re: Re: Query Autocomplete Evaluation

2020-02-25 Thread Audrey Lorberfeld - audrey.lorberf...@ibm.com
This article http://wwwconference.org/proceedings/www2011/proceedings/p107.pdf also indicates that MRR needs binary relevance labels, p. 114: "To this end, we selected a random sample of 198 (query, context) pairs from the set of 7,311 pairs, and manually tagged each of them as related (i.e., th