yup. youre going to find solr is WAY more efficient than you think when it
comes to complex queries.
On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 3:17 PM Audrey Lorberfeld - audrey.lorberf...@ibm.com
wrote:
> True...I guess another rub here is that we're using the edismax parser, so
> all of our queries are inherent
True...I guess another rub here is that we're using the edismax parser, so all
of our queries are inherently OR queries. So for a query like 'the ibm way',
the search engine would have to:
1) retrieve a document list for:
--> "ibm" (this list is probably 80% of the documents)
--> "the" (th
if you have anything close to a decent server you wont notice it all. im
at about 21 million documents, index varies between 450gb to 800gb
depending on merges, and about 60k searches a day and stay sub second non
stop, and this is on a single core/non cloud environment
On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 2:5
only in my more like this tools, but they have a very specific purpose,
otherwise no
On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 2:31 PM Audrey Lorberfeld - audrey.lorberf...@ibm.com
wrote:
> Wow, thank you so much, everyone. This is all incredibly helpful insight.
>
> So, would it be fair to say that the majority o
oh and by 'non stop' i mean close enough for me :)
On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 2:59 PM David Hastings
wrote:
> if you have anything close to a decent server you wont notice it all. im
> at about 21 million documents, index varies between 450gb to 800gb
> depending on merges, and about 60k searches a
Also, in terms of computational cost, it would seem that including most
terms/not having a stop ilst would take a toll on the system. For instance,
right now we have "ibm" as a stop word because it appears everywhere in our
corpus. If we did not include it in the stop words file, we would have t
Wow, thank you so much, everyone. This is all incredibly helpful insight.
So, would it be fair to say that the majority of you all do NOT use stop words?
--
Audrey Lorberfeld
Data Scientist, w3 Search
IBM
audrey.lorberf...@ibm.com
On 10/9/19, 11:14 AM, "David Hastings" wrote:
However,
