Re: facet.offset issue (previosly: [solr 3.4] anomaly during distributed facet query with 102 shards)

2013-04-30 Thread Dmitry Kan
It is logical to use facet pagination for us, if it would work. It just doesn't, probably due the data amount we store and imposed RAM settings. On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Toke Eskildsen wrote: > On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 18:22 +0200, Dmitry Kan wrote: > > Does it even make sense to pagina

Re: facet.offset issue (previosly: [solr 3.4] anomaly during distributed facet query with 102 shards)

2013-04-30 Thread Toke Eskildsen
On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 18:22 +0200, Dmitry Kan wrote: > Does it even make sense to paginate in facet searches, if we require deep > paging? Whether it makes sense logically is up to you. Technically deep paging in facets could be implemented in approximately the same way as deep paging in search r

Re: facet.offset issue (previosly: [solr 3.4] anomaly during distributed facet query with 102 shards)

2013-04-29 Thread Dmitry Kan
Hi guys, do you have any ideas? Does it even make sense to paginate in facet searches, if we require deep paging? Dmitry On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Dmitry Kan wrote: > Hi list, > > We have encountered a weird bug related to the facet.offset parameter. In > short: the more general quer

facet.offset issue (previosly: [solr 3.4] anomaly during distributed facet query with 102 shards)

2013-04-26 Thread Dmitry Kan
Hi list, We have encountered a weird bug related to the facet.offset parameter. In short: the more general query is, that generates lots of hits, the higher the risk of the facet.offset parameter to stop working. In more detail: 1. Since getting all facets we need (facet.limit=1000) from around

Re: [solr 3.4] anomaly during distributed facet query with 102 shards

2013-04-26 Thread Dmitry Kan
Hi, 1. Ruled out possibility to test 4.2.1 router against 3.4 shard farm for obvious reasons (java.lang.RuntimeException: Invalid version (expected 2, but 60) or the data in not in 'javabin' format). 2. Tried jetty, but same result. On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Dmitry Kan wrote: > Thanks,

Re: [solr 3.4] anomaly during distributed facet query with 102 shards

2013-04-25 Thread Dmitry Kan
Thanks, Yonik. Yes, I supposed that. We are in the pre-release phase, so we have the pressure. Solr 3.4. Would setting up 4.2.1 router work with 3.4 shards? On 25 Apr 2013 17:11, "Yonik Seeley" wrote: > On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 8:32 AM, Dmitry Kan wrote: > > Are there any distrib facet gurus on

Re: [solr 3.4] anomaly during distributed facet query with 102 shards

2013-04-25 Thread Yonik Seeley
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 8:32 AM, Dmitry Kan wrote: > Are there any distrib facet gurus on the list? I would be ready to try > sensible ideas, including on the source code level, if someone of you could > give me a hand. The Lucene/Solr Revolution conference is coming up next week, so I think many

Re: [solr 3.4] anomaly during distributed facet query with 102 shards

2013-04-25 Thread Dmitry Kan
Are there any distrib facet gurus on the list? I would be ready to try sensible ideas, including on the source code level, if someone of you could give me a hand. Dmitry On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Dmitry Kan wrote: > Hello list, > > We deal with an anomaly when doing a distributed facet

Fwd: [solr 3.4] anomaly during distributed facet query with 102 shards

2013-04-24 Thread Dmitry Kan
Hello list, We deal with an anomaly when doing a distributed facet query against 102 shards. The problem manifests itself in both the frontend solr (router) and a shard. Each time the request is executed, always different shard is affected (at random, hence the "anomaly"). The query is: http://r