Re: [Wildcard query] Weird behaviour

2010-12-03 Thread Robert Muir
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 7:49 AM, Tanguy Moal wrote: > Thank you very much Robert for replying that fast and accurately. > > I have effectively an other idea in mind to provide similar > suggestions less expansively, I was balancing between the work around > and the report issue options. > > I don't

Re: [Wildcard query] Weird behaviour

2010-12-03 Thread Tanguy Moal
Thank you very much Robert for replying that fast and accurately. I have effectively an other idea in mind to provide similar suggestions less expansively, I was balancing between the work around and the report issue options. I don't regret it since you came with a possible fix. I'll give it a tr

Re: [Wildcard query] Weird behaviour

2010-12-03 Thread Robert Muir
Actually, i took a look at the code again, the queries you mentioned: "I send queries to that field in the form (*term1*term2*)" I think the patch will not fix your problem... The only way i know you can fix this would be to upgrade to lucene/solr trunk, where wildcard comparison is linear to the

Re: [Wildcard query] Weird behaviour

2010-12-03 Thread Robert Muir
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Tanguy Moal wrote: > However suddenly CPU usage simply doubles, and sometimes eventually > start using all 16 cores of the server, whereas the number of handled > request is pretty stable, and even starts decreasing because of > degraded user experience due to drama