Re: [OT] 20180917-Need Apache SOLR support

2018-09-18 Thread Jan Høydahl
I guess you could do a version-independent backup with /export handler and store docs in XML or JSON format. Or you could use streaming and store the entire index as JSON tuples, which could then be ingested into another version. But it is correct that the backup/restore feature of Solr is not pr

Re: [OT] 20180917-Need Apache SOLR support

2018-09-18 Thread Erick Erickson
The only hard-and-fast rule is that you must re-index from source when you upgrade to Solr X+2. Solr (well, Lucene) tries very hard to maintain one-major-version back-compatibility, so Solr 8 will function with Solr 7 indexes but _not_ any index _ever touched_ by 6x. That said, it's usually a good

Re: [OT] 20180917-Need Apache SOLR support

2018-09-18 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Walter, On 9/18/18 11:24, Walter Underwood wrote: > It isn’t very clear from that page, but the two backup methods make > a copy of the indexes in a commit-aware way. That is all. One > method copies them to a new server, the other to files in the d

Re: [OT] 20180917-Need Apache SOLR support

2018-09-18 Thread Walter Underwood
It isn’t very clear from that page, but the two backup methods make a copy of the indexes in a commit-aware way. That is all. One method copies them to a new server, the other to files in the data directory. Database backups generally have a separate backup format which is independent of the data

Re: [OT] 20180917-Need Apache SOLR support

2018-09-18 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Walter, On 9/17/18 11:39, Walter Underwood wrote: > Do not use Solr as a database. It was never designed to be a > database. It is missing a lot of features that are normal in > databases. > > [...] * no real backups (Solr backup is a cold server,