Hi Alessandro,
It's not uncommon for Solr patches to remain uncommitted for months, even
years. In fact some never get merged. Don't let that discourage you!
k/r,
Scott
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 11:49 AM, Alessandro Benedetti <
abenede...@apache.org> wrote:
> I start to feel that is not that eas
I start to feel that is not that easy to contribute improvements or small
fix to Solr ( if they are not super interesting to the mass) .
I think this one could be a good improvement in the MLT but I would love to
discuss this with some committer.
The patch is attached, it is there since months ago.
Hi Guys,
is it possible to have any feedback ?
Is there any process to speed up bug resolution / discussions ?
just want to understand if the patch is not good enough, if I need to
improve it or simply no-one took a look ...
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6954
Cheers
On 11 January
Hi guys,
the patch seems fine to me.
I didn't spend much more time on the code but I checked the tests and the
pre-commit checks.
It seems fine to me.
Let me know ,
Cheers
On 31 December 2015 at 18:40, Alessandro Benedetti
wrote:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6954
>
> First dra
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6954
First draft patch available, I will check better the tests new year !
On 29 December 2015 at 13:43, Alessandro Benedetti
wrote:
> Sure, I will proceed tomorrow with the Jira and the simple patch + tests.
>
> In the meantime let's try to collect
Sure, I will proceed tomorrow with the Jira and the simple patch + tests.
In the meantime let's try to collect some additional feedback.
Cheers
On 29 December 2015 at 12:43, Anshum Gupta wrote:
> Feel free to create a JIRA and put up a patch if you can.
>
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 4:26 PM, Ale
Feel free to create a JIRA and put up a patch if you can.
On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 4:26 PM, Alessandro Benedetti wrote:
> Hi guys,
> While I was exploring the way we build the More Like This query, I
> discovered a part I am not convinced of :
>
>
>
> Let's see how we build the query :
> org.apac
Hi guys,
While I was exploring the way we build the More Like This query, I
discovered a part I am not convinced of :
Let's see how we build the query :
org.apache.lucene.queries.mlt.MoreLikeThis#retrieveTerms(int)
1) we extract the terms from the interesting fields, adding them to a map :
Map
