Re: [Benchmark SOLR] JETTY VS TOMCAT - Jetty 15% slower - need advice to improve Jetty performance

2017-02-01 Thread Gerald Reinhart
We have done some profiling with Visualvm, but nothing obvious appeared. Thank Rick for the advice. Gérald Reinhart On 02/01/2017 11:17 AM, Rick Leir wrote: There is a profiling tool in Eclipse that can show you a tree of method calls, with timing information. I have found this useful in th

Re: [Benchmark SOLR] JETTY VS TOMCAT - Jetty 15% slower - need advice to improve Jetty performance

2017-02-01 Thread Rick Leir
There is a profiling tool in Eclipse that can show you a tree of method calls, with timing information. I have found this useful in the past to investigate a performance problem. But it might not help if the problem only occurs at 165 queries per second (is that true?). cheers -- Rick On 201

[Benchmark SOLR] JETTY VS TOMCAT - Jetty 15% slower - need advice to improve Jetty performance

2017-01-30 Thread Gerald Reinhart
Hello, In addition to the following settings, we have tried to : - force Jetty to use more threads - put the same GC options as our Tomcat - change nb of acceptors and selectors and every time Jetty is slower than Tomcat. Any advice is welcome Thanks, Gérald

Re: [Benchmark SOLR] JETTY VS TOMCAT

2017-01-27 Thread Yago Riveiro
Solr run tests with jetty. I ran in nasty bugs in solr in the past with tomcat. My advise it’s that speed is only one more metric, robustness and reliability matter too. -- /Yago Riveiro On 27 Jan 2017 15:38 +, William Bell , wrote: > Did you try: > > Set your acceptor count, SelectChanne

Re: [Benchmark SOLR] JETTY VS TOMCAT

2017-01-27 Thread William Bell
Did you try: Set your acceptor count, SelectChannelConnector.setAcceptors(int) to be a a value between 1 and (number_of_cpu_cores - 1). On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 3:22 AM, Geral

[Benchmark SOLR] JETTY VS TOMCAT

2017-01-27 Thread Gerald Reinhart
Hello, We are migrating our platform from - Solr 5.4.1 hosted by a Tomcat to - Solr 5.4.1 standalone (hosted by Jetty) => Jetty is 15% slower than Tomcat in the same conditions. Here are details about the benchmarks : Context : - Index with 9 000 000 docume