Re: "order" question on solr multi value field

2012-12-19 Thread Yonik Seeley
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 8:24 PM, Robert Muir wrote: > I agree with James. Actually lucene tests will fail if a codec violates this. > > Actually it goes much deeper than this. > > From the lucene apis, when you call IndexReader.document() with your > storedfieldVisitor, it must visit the fields in

RE: "order" question on solr multi value field

2012-12-19 Thread Dyer, James
PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: "order" question on solr multi value field I agree with James. Actually lucene tests will fail if a codec violates this. Actually it goes much deeper than this. From the lucene apis, when you call IndexReader.document() with your storedfieldV

Re: "order" question on solr multi value field

2012-12-18 Thread Robert Muir
ields stay in the order in which they were added to the > Document is a guarantee that many many users depend on. > > James Dyer > E-Commerce Systems > Ingram Content Group > (615) 213-4311 > > > -Original Message----- > From: Jack Krupansky [mailto:j...@basetechno

Re: "order" question on solr multi value field

2012-12-18 Thread Otis Gospodnetic
> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2012 1:54 PM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: RE: "order" question on solr multi value field > > I agree with you the documentation should be more explicit. I just don't > want to give new users the impression that stored f

Re: "order" question on solr multi value field

2012-12-18 Thread Jack Krupansky
Yeah, and this is why I want it to be explicit. -- Jack Krupansky -Original Message- From: Dyer, James Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2012 1:54 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: "order" question on solr multi value field I agree with you the documentation shou

RE: "order" question on solr multi value field

2012-12-18 Thread Dyer, James
Group (615) 213-4311 -Original Message- From: Jack Krupansky [mailto:j...@basetechnology.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2012 11:35 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: "order" question on solr multi value field "A multi-valued field is the same as a sin

Re: "order" question on solr multi value field

2012-12-18 Thread Jack Krupansky
om: Dyer, James Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2012 12:08 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: "order" question on solr multi value field I suppose using this same logic you can not guarantee the tokens on a stored, single-value field would be stored in the order they arrive ei

RE: "order" question on solr multi value field

2012-12-18 Thread Dyer, James
Dyer E-Commerce Systems Ingram Content Group (615) 213-4311 -Original Message- From: Jack Krupansky [mailto:j...@basetechnology.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2012 10:16 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: "order" question on solr multi value field Ah, good point

Re: "order" question on solr multi value field

2012-12-18 Thread Jack Krupansky
: Dyer, James Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2012 10:54 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: "order" question on solr multi value field I would say such a guarantee is implied by the javadoc to Analyzer#getPositionIncrementGap . It says this value is an "increment" to b

RE: "order" question on solr multi value field

2012-12-18 Thread Dyer, James
guarantee that many many users depend on. James Dyer E-Commerce Systems Ingram Content Group (615) 213-4311 -Original Message- From: Jack Krupansky [mailto:j...@basetechnology.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2012 9:30 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: "order" questio

Re: "order" question on solr multi value field

2012-12-18 Thread Jack Krupansky
upansky -Original Message- From: Erik Hatcher Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2012 9:40 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Cc: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: "order" question on solr multi value field I don't know of an "official" guarantee of maintaining

Re: "order" question on solr multi value field

2012-12-18 Thread Erik Hatcher
ocumented anywhere, it might > happen that in Solr 4.0 or later, they start reordering them. If they do > then there will be a big problem for us :) > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/order-question-on-solr-multi-value-field-tp4027695p4027713.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: "order" question on solr multi value field

2012-12-18 Thread hellorsanjeev
or us :) -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/order-question-on-solr-multi-value-field-tp4027695p4027713.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: "order" question on solr multi value field

2012-12-18 Thread Upayavira
> > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/order-question-on-solr-multi-value-field-tp4027695.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

"order" question on solr multi value field

2012-12-17 Thread hellorsanjeev
Solr maintains the order of values inserted into multi-valued field OR is it just by luck we are getting them in insertion order? By my experience so far, it has always maintained. Thanks in advance. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/order-question-on-solr-multi