OK, I don't think you actually need the managed schema stuff (although
you could use it).
So, you're analyzing these docs and making guesses (educated guesses,
probably very
sophisticated guesses, but guesses) about what kind of thing it is
(numeric, name, city,
concept, whatever).
You can simply
Thanks!
Indeed, one of my issues is that I can not know about the fields to be
indexed before seeing (and making some entity extraction) on the browsed
documents.
It is the reason I thought to avoid the schema definition ...
The schema API sounds interesting! Does it exist via SolrJ?
Many thanks
Could you explain a bit more _why_ you want to do this? As you're
probably well aware, there
are multiple ways to shoot yourself in the foot in lower-level Lucene.
If you have some situation where you're creating indexes on the fly
that may vary then
you could consider the "managed schema" that le
On 4/30/2015 8:43 AM, Sznajder ForMailingList wrote:
> I am interested to index some documents in Solr, as I did in Lucene.
>
> I mean: giving via solrJ all the information about the field I am adding
> (Tokenize, store, facet etc...)
>
> can we do that? Or is it mandatory to define a schema on the
Hi,
I am interested to index some documents in Solr, as I did in Lucene.
I mean: giving via solrJ all the information about the field I am adding
(Tokenize, store, facet etc...)
can we do that? Or is it mandatory to define a schema on the collection?
Thanks a lot!
Benjamin
