ersonnel install versions until I got the needed
> functionality.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tomás Fernández Löbbe [mailto:tomasflo...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 5:12 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: 'Stable' 4.0 versi
e future point in time (which I supposed
> might also be called Solr 4 in the future -- won't that be confusing!)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Herman Kiefus [mailto:herm...@angieslist.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 2:55 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>
ight also be called
> Solr 4 in the future -- won't that be confusing!)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Herman Kiefus [mailto:herm...@angieslist.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 2:55 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: 'Stable' 4.0 version
s [mailto:herm...@angieslist.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 2:55 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: 'Stable' 4.0 version
My origination uses Solr 4 because of our geospatial requirements. What
insight can you share (if any) regarding moving forward to a later nightly
build? Or
My origination uses Solr 4 because of our geospatial requirements. What
insight can you share (if any) regarding moving forward to a later nightly
build? Or, for those of you using 4.0 in a Production setting, when is it that
you move ahead?
