DocValue field & commit

A facet heavy query which uses docValue fields for faceting returns about 5k results executes between 10ms to 5 secs and the 5 secs time seems to coincide with after a hard commit. Does that have any relation? Why the fluctuation in execution time? Thanks, Revas

Solr 8.2 indexing issues

We recently migrated from 6.6.2 to 8.2. We are seeing issues with indexing where the leader and the replica document counts do not match. We get different results every time we do a *:* search. The only issue we see in the logs is Jira issue : Solr-13293 Has anybody seen similar issues? Thanks

Re: Solr 4.7 .0 Issues with Update and Delete

ll seeing this problem come by > the boards. > > Best, > Erick > > On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Sujatha Arun wrote: > > Erick, > > > > Actually I am synching data between solr and Mongodb using > > mongo-connector.The details below. I have submitterd

Re: Solr 4.7 .0 Issues with Update and Delete

http://blahlbah/solr/collection/update?commit=true? > > Are you sure you aren't seeing, say, browser caching? > > Best, > Erick > > On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Sujatha Arun wrote: > > Thanks, BookId is the unique key, the issue is resolved with respect to > >

Re: Solr 4.7 .0 Issues with Update and Delete

he Update issue (exact query sent and all the > log > > corresponding entries) would be needed to help you with your problem. > > > > Cheers > > Angel > > > > > > On 01.10.2014 09:19, Sujatha Arun wrote: > >> > >> I am having the following iss

Solr 4.7 .0 Issues with Update and Delete

I am having the following issue on delete and update in solr 4.7.0 *Delete Issue* I am using the following Curl command to delete a document from index curl http://localhost:8080/solr/bf/update?commit=true -H "Content-Type: text/xml" --data-binary '"1.0"' 07 This is what I see in logs I

PDF Indexing

Hi, I am able to use TIKA and DIH to Index a pdf as a single document.However I need each page to be single document. Is there any inbuilt mechanism to achieve the same or do I have to use pdfbox or any other tool achieve this? Regards

Re: solr 4.3.1 Installation

. > > > http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrLogging#Using_the_example_logging_setup_in_containers_other_than_Jetty > > > > > On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Sujatha Arun wrote: > > > Hi , > > > > We have been using solr 3.6.1 .Recently downloaded the solr 4.3.1 &g

solr 4.3.1 Installation

Hi , We have been using solr 3.6.1 .Recently downloaded the solr 4.3.1 version and installed the same as multicore setup as follows Folder Structure solr.war solr conf core0 core1 solr.xml Created the context fragment xml file in tomcat/conf/catalina/l

Re: XInclude in data-config.xml

Hi Andre, In 3.6.1 version when we used the entities in schema.xml for language analyzers ,it gave errors on server restart and core would not load . Regards, Sujatha 2013/4/12 Andre Bois-Crettez > On 04/12/2013 09:31 AM, stockii wrote: > >> hello. >> >> is it possible to include some entiti

Latency Comparison between cloud hosting Vs Dedicated hosting

Hi, We are comparing search request latency between Amazon Vs Dedicated hosting [Rackspace] .For comparison we used solr version 3.6.1 and Amazon small instance.The index size was less than 1GB. We see that the latency is about 75 -100 % from Amazon. Any body who has migrated form Dedicated hos

Re: Master /Slave Set up on AWS - 3.6.1

onsider a weaker/cheaper master, and more slaves. > > Otis > -- > Solr & ElasticSearch Support > http://sematext.com/ > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Sujatha Arun wrote: > > > Hi Otis,Michael, > > > > Thanks for your input and sugge

Re: Master /Slave Set up on AWS - 3.6.1

, NY 10017-6271 > > www.appinions.com > > Where Influence Isn’t a Game > > > On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Sujatha Arun wrote: > > Is there anything wrong with set up? > > > > On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Sujatha Arun > wrote: > > > >

Re: Master /Slave Set up on AWS - 3.6.1

Is there anything wrong with set up? On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Sujatha Arun wrote: > Hi Otis, > > Since currently we are planning for only one slave due to cost > considerations, can we have an ELB fronting the master and slave for HA. > >1. All index requests wil

Re: Master /Slave Set up on AWS - 3.6.1

t; slave, but that's going to mean some down time... > > Otis > -- > Solr & ElasticSearch Support > http://sematext.com/ > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 3:05 AM, Sujatha Arun wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > We are planning to set up *2

Master /Slave Set up on AWS - 3.6.1

Hi, We are planning to set up *2* *High-Memory Quadruple Extra Large Instance *as master and slave for our multicore solr setup which has more than 200 cores spread between a couple of webapps on a single JVM on *AWS* All indexing [via a queue will go to master ] . One Slave Server will repli

Multicore Master - Slave - solr 3.6.1

We have a multicore setup with more that 200 cores . Some of the cores have different schema based on the search type /language. While trying to migrate to Master /Slave set up. I see that we can specify the Master /Slave properties in solrcore.properties file . However does this have to done at

Re: solr 3.6.1 Indexing and utf8 issue

Thanks for the pointer , but given the same index code ,why does this not work in solr 3.6.1 but wors fine in solr 1.3 Any idea? Regards Sujatha On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 9:33 PM, Markus Jelsma wrote: > Hi, > > You've likely got some non-character code points in your data and they > need to be st

solr 3.6.1 Indexing and utf8 issue

Hi, We are on solr 3.6.1 on Tomcat 5.5.25 . The Indexing of polish content throws the following error . *Caused by: com.ctc.wstx.exc.WstxIOException: Invalid UTF-8 middle byte 0x77 (at char #166, byte #127)* at com.ctc.wstx.sr.StreamScanner.throwFromIOE(StreamScanner.java:708) at com.ctc.wstx.s

Re: AutoComplete with FiterQuery for Full content

ng.suggest.tst.** > TSTLookup >name >true > > > > name="/suggest"> > >true >**suggest >true >5 >**true > > >suggest > > > > -- Jack Krupansky > > -Original Message- From: S

AutoComplete with FiterQuery for Full content

Hi, I need suggestion on solr Autocomplete for Full content with Filter query. I have currently implemented this as below 1. Solr version 3.6.1 2. solr.StandardTokenizerFactory 3. EdgeNGramFilterFactory with maxGramSize="25" minGramSize="1" 4. Stored the content field 5. Use the

AutoComplete with FiterQuery for Full content

Hi, I need suggestion on solr Autocomplete for Full content with Filter query. I have currently implemented this as below 1. Solr version 3.6.1 2. solr.StandardTokenizerFactory 3. EdgeNGramFilterFactory with maxGramSize="25" minGramSize="1" 4. Stored the content field 5. Use the

Re: Master /Slave Architecture3.6.1

ection and your assumptions are correct. In > short, if the performance hit is too big then you simply need more ec2 > instances (some have high cpu, some memory, some disk IO ... pick wisely). > > Otis > Solr & ElasticSearch Support > http://sematext.com/ > On Jan 10, 2013

Master /Slave Architecture3.6.1

Hi, Our current architecture is as follows , - Single server [ On which we do both Indexing and Searching] - Solr version 3.6.1 Multicores - We have several small & big indexes as cores within a webapp - Our Indexing to the individual cores happen via an index queue ,due to which

Language schema Template which includes appropriate language analysis field type as a separate xml file

Hi , Our requirement is have a separate schema for every language which differs in the field type definition for language based analysis.If I have a standard schema which differs only in the language analysis part ,which can be inserted by any of the 3 methods in the schema.xml as mentioned in the

Re: solr autocomplete requirement

Anyone with suggestions on this? On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 10:13 PM, Sujatha Arun wrote: > Hi, > > Our requirement for auto complete is slightly complicated , We need two > types of auto complete > > 1. Meta data Auto complete > 2. Full text Content Auto complete > &g

Re: Search Suggest for full content with Filter option

Any Suggestions on this? On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Sujatha Arun wrote: > Hello, > > I want suggestions for full content of several books with a filter > that restricts suggestions to a single book .However the best options of > suggester and terms component do not

solr -autosuggest

Hi, A few question on Solr Auto suggest below Q1)I tried using the Index based Suggest functionality with solr 3.6.1 , can I combine this with file based boosting .Currently when I specify the index field and the sourcelocation,the file in the source location is not considered. Is there any

Re: solr1.4 code Example

Thanks ,that worked. Regards Sujatha On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Iwan Hanjoyo wrote: > you can download the code directly from here > > http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com/ > > http://solrenterprisesearchserver.s3-website-us-east-1.amazonaws.com/downloads/5883-solr-enterprise-search2.

Re: solr1.4 code Example

did get some files by jar unpacking ,but could not get the ones I wanted ...thanks anyway !! On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Toke Eskildsen wrote: > On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 13:08 +0200, Sujatha Arun wrote: > > I am unable to unzip the 5883_Code.zip file for solr 1.4 from paktpub >

solr1.4 code Example

hi, I am unable to unzip the 5883_Code.zip file for solr 1.4 from paktpub site .I get the error message End-of-central-directory signature not found. Either this file is not a zipfile, or it constitutes one disk of a multi-part archive. In the latter case the central directory and zipfil

Re: Merge Policy Recommendation for 3.6.1

Thanks Shawn,that helps a lot .our current OS limit is set to 300,000+, I guess, which is I heard is maximum for the OS .. not sure of the soft and hard limits .Will check this . Regards, Sujatha On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 8:14 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote: > On 9/28/2012 12:43 AM, Sujatha Arun wr

Merge Policy Recommendation for 3.6.1

Hello, In the case where there are over 200+ cores on a single node , is it recommended to go with Tiered MP with segment size of 4 ? Our Index size vary from a few MB to 4 GB . Will there be any issue with "Too many open files " and the number of indexes with respect to MP ? At the moment we ar

Re: Performance Degradation on Migrating from 1.3 to solr 3.6.1

FS in 1.3 to avoid the "too many open file issue which we had encountered. Regards Sujatha On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Sujatha Arun wrote: > Any comments on this? > > > > On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 10:28 PM, Sujatha Arun wrote: > >> Thanks Jack. >> >

Re: Performance Degradation on Migrating from 1.3 to solr 3.6.1

Any comments on this? On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 10:28 PM, Sujatha Arun wrote: > Thanks Jack. > > so Qtime = Sum of all prepare components + sum of all process components - > Debug comp process/prepare time > > In 3.6.1 the process part of Query component for the following que

Re: Performance Degradation on Migrating from 1.3 to solr 3.6.1

le insight. > > -- Jack Krupansky > > From: Sujatha Arun > Sent: Monday, September 24, 2012 7:26 AM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Performance Degradation on Migrating from 1.3 to solr 3.6.1 > > Hi, > > On migrating from 1.3 to 3.6.1 , I see the quer

Performance Degradation on Migrating from 1.3 to solr 3.6.1

Hi, On migrating from 1.3 to 3.6.1 , I see the query performance degrading by nearly 2 times for all types of query. Indexing performance slight degradation over 1.3 For Indexing we use our custom scripts that post xml over HTTP. Any thing that I might have missed . I am thinking that this migh

Re: Compond File Format Advice needed - On migration to 3.6.1

should be some wiki doc for this, but I couldn't find any. > > -- Jack Krupansky > > -Original Message- From: Sujatha Arun > Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2012 10:00 PM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Compond File Format Advice needed - On migration

Re: Compond File Format Advice needed - On migration to 3.6.1

ucene issue was closed in 3.1. This must be some other problem. > 4) You can pick another merge policy if TieredMergePolicy does not work > for you. > > - Original Message ----- > | From: "Sujatha Arun" > | To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > | Sent: Tuesday, September

Re: Compond File Format Advice needed - On migration to 3.6.1

anybody? On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 10:42 PM, Sujatha Arun wrote: > Hi , > > The default Index file creation format in 3.6.1 [migrating from 1.3] > in-spite of setting the usecompoundfile to true seems to be to create non > compound files due to Lucene > 2790<https://i

Compond File Format Advice needed - On migration to 3.6.1

Hi , The default Index file creation format in 3.6.1 [migrating from 1.3] in-spite of setting the usecompoundfile to true seems to be to create non compound files due to Lucene 2790 . I have tried the following ,but everything seems to create no

Re: 3.6.1 unable to create compound Index files?

compound format ,irrespective of *noCFSRatio .* * * Regards Sujatha On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Sujatha Arun wrote: > Hi, > > I am unable to create compound Index format in 3.6.1 inspite of setting > as true. I do not see any .cfs file ,instead all the > .fdx,frq etc are see

3.6.1 unable to create compound Index files?

Hi, I am unable to create compound Index format in 3.6.1 inspite of setting as true. I do not see any .cfs file ,instead all the .fdx,frq etc are seen and I see the segments_8 even though the mergefactor is at 4 . Should I not see only 4 segment files at any time? Please find attached schema an

Re: 1.3 to 3.6 migration

se errors, possibly > because it is more flexible and has more features now. > 4. Your key values analyze differently in Solr 3.6 so that the keys of the > extra documents mapped to other existing keys in Solr 1.3, causing the > "extra" documents to overwrite existing documents in Solr

Re: 1.3 to 3.6 migration

ml > Performance Monitoring - http://sematext.com/spm/index.html > > > On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Sujatha Arun wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Just migrated to 3.6.1 from 1.3 version with the following observation > > > > Indexed content using the same sour

Re: 3.6.1 - Suggester and spellcheker Implementation

ml > Performance Monitoring - http://sematext.com/spm/index.html > > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Sujatha Arun wrote: > > Hi , > > > > If I am looking to implement Suggester Implementation with 3.6.1 ,I > beleive > > this creates it own index , now If I

1.3 to 3.6 migration

Hi, Just migrated to 3.6.1 from 1.3 version with the following observation Indexed content using the same source *1.3 3.6.1* Number of documents indexed 11505 13937 Index Time - Full Index

3.6.1 - Suggester and spellcheker Implementation

Hi , If I am looking to implement Suggester Implementation with 3.6.1 ,I beleive this creates it own index , now If I want to also use the spellcheck also ,would it be using the same index as suggester? Regards Sujatha

Re: Version Migration from solr 1.3

, Sujatha Arun wrote: > Hi , > > If we are migrating from 1.3 ,which is the current stable version that we > should be looking at 3.6.1 or 3.6.2 ? > > Regards > Sujatha >

Solr Cache

if we pre assigning the cache values in the solrconfig.xml as follows for each core [solr 1.3] .IS the RAM memory pre assigned as follows per core and how much would be used for each .Would I be able to calculate the RAM reserved for each cache.since we have many such cores with the same Cache val

Re: Patch 2429 for solr1.3?

or instance, on local params and I'm not > even sure they exist in 1.3. > > Good luck > Erick > > On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 12:30 AM, Sujatha Arun > wrote: > > Can we use the patch 2429 in solr 1.3? > > > > Regards > > Sujatha >

Patch 2429 for solr1.3?

Can we use the patch 2429 in solr 1.3? Regards Sujatha

Re: Muticore Sharding

became slow? > > Thanks. > > -- Jack Krupansky > > -Original Message- From: Sujatha Arun > Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 10:50 AM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Muticore Sharding > > > Sorry typo ,I meant upwards of 20s at any time. What should I b

Re: Muticore Sharding

Sorry typo ,I meant upwards of 20s at any time. What should I be looking at? Regards Sujatha On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 8:09 PM, Sujatha Arun wrote: > Erik, > > What could be the issue Load / I/O ? It seems to shows upwards of 20 ms > at any time > > Regards > Sujatha >

Re: Muticore Sharding

> Also, what's the query parse output? I imagine you're doing a boolean OR > query across all those terms (include "a"), yes? Maybe you'd rather the > operator be AND? > > Erik > > > On Aug 17, 2012, at 08:01 , Sujatha Arun wrote: > >

Re: Muticore Sharding

g custom > in there? > > What are the timings of the components in the debugQuery=true response? > > Is the server under load when you're issuing these queries? What about > RAM? > > Again, what version of Solr? > > Erik > > > > > On Aug 17,

Re: Muticore Sharding

ething > to consider I'd say. But yes, you would want to reindex to distribute the > documents. > > Erik > > > On Aug 17, 2012, at 02:21 , Sujatha Arun wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > One of the Index in a multicore set up has a 3GB+ index ,and it

Re: Custom Plugins for solr

> Appinions | 18 East 41st St., Suite 1806 | New York, NY 10017 > www.appinions.com > Where Influence Isn’t a Game > > > On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Sujatha Arun > wrote: > > Thanks ,I am going to try this on solr 1.3 version .Would the approach be &g

Re: Custom Plugins for solr

ner's classpath, you should be > fine with just the one class. > > Michael Della Bitta > > > Appinions | 18 East 41st St., Suite 1806 | New York, NY 10017 > www.appinions.com > Where Influence Isn’t a Game > > >

Re: Custom Plugins for solr

asses? > > Michael > > > > Appinions | 18 East 41st St., Suite 1806 | New York, NY 10017 > www.appinions.com > Where Influence Isn’t a Game > > > On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 7:18 AM, Sujatha Arun wrote: > > Hi , > > > > I would like to w

Custom Plugins for solr

Hi , I would like to write a custom component for solr to address a particular issue. This is what I have been doing ,write the custom code directly in the downloaded code base and rebuild the war file and deploy the same. We currently have multiple cores ,hence I want to approach this in a cor

Re: solr 1872

ms or similar acl mechanism for your container. > SolrACLSecurity is for controlling fine-grained access to data within a > core. > > Thanks, > Peter > > > > On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 5:50 AM, Sujatha Arun wrote: > > > Peter, > > > > In a multicore environmen

Re: solr 1872

Peter, In a multicore environment , where should the acl file reside , under the conf directory ,Can I use a acl file per core ? Regards Sujatha On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Sujatha Arun wrote: > Renamed to zip and worked fine,thanks > > Regards > Sujatha > > > On T

Re: solr 1872

Renamed to zip and worked fine,thanks Regards Sujatha On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Sujatha Arun wrote: > thanks ,was looking to the rar file for instructions on set up . > > Regards > Sujatha > > > On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 1:07 AM, Peter Sturge wrote: > >>

Re: solr 1872

r version --> > SolrACLSecurity.java > 26kb 12 Apr 2010 10:35 > > Thanks, > Peter > > > > On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Sujatha Arun wrote: > > > I am uable to use the rar file from the site > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1872. > > > &g

solr 1872

I am uable to use the rar file from the site https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1872. When I try to open it,I get the message 'SolrACLSecurity.rar is not RAR archive. Is the file there at this link? Regards Sujatha

OS memory Pollution on rsync?

Hello, When we migrated the solr webapps to a new server in production,We did an rsync of all the indexes in our old server . On checking with Jconsole ,the OS free Ram was already filled to twice the Index size .There is no other service in this server. The rsync was done twice. Even though we

Re: solr 1.3 Multicores and maxboolean clause

g when it says "Whichever Solr core initializes last will > win the setting of the solrconfig.xml's maxBooleanClauses value." The first > core to be loaded wins. Or, maybe the source code is wrong. Either way, a > correction is needed. > > -- Jack Krupansky > > -Origin

solr 1.3 Multicores and maxboolean clause

Hello, The solrcore Wiki says that "Lucene's BooleanQuerymaxClauseCount is a static variable, making it a single value across the entire JVM. Whichever Solr core initializes last will win the setting of the solrconfig.xml's maxBooleanClauses value. Workaro

Re: Multicore Issue - Server Restart

solr 1.3 Regards Sujatha On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Siva Kommuri wrote: > Hi Sujatha, > > Which version of Solr are you using? > > Best Wishes, > Siva > > On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 12:22 AM, Sujatha Arun > wrote: > > > Yes ,that is correct. > > &

Re: Multicore Issue - Server Restart

Yes ,that is correct. Regards Sujatha On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 7:23 PM, lboutros wrote: > Hi Suajtha, > > each webapps has its own solr home ? > > Ludovic. > > - > Jouve > France. > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Multicore-Issue-Server-Restart-tp39865

Multicore Issue - Server Restart

Hello , We have a multicore webapp for every 50 cores.Currently 3 Multicore webapps and 150 cores distributed across the 3 webapps. When we re started the server [Tomcat] ,we noticed that the solr.xml was wiped out and we could not see any cores in webapp1 and webapp3 ,but only a few cores in we

Re: Dynamic creation of cores for this use case.

you will have to create the directory and configs yourself .you will need to call the command once you create the directory and give permissions ,the following url only creates the data folder and makes an entry in solr.xml Refer :http://blog.dustinrue.com/archives/690 Regards Sujahta On Wed, Ma

Re: Solr Webapps and JVM code cache

HBase - > http://sematext.com/spm > > > > > > > From: Sujatha Arun > >To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > >Sent: Tuesday, May 8, 2012 7:24 AM > >Subject: Solr Webapps and JVM code cache > > > >Hello , > > > >I see that the code cache in the JVM is n

Re: Solr Webapps and JVM code cache

rote: > Hi Sujatha, > > You will likely have to increase the JVM permgen space for your > container when you launch it. This is normal. How you do this depends on > the container you're using and how you launch it. > > Michael > > On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 16:54 +0530, Su

Solr Webapps and JVM code cache

Hello , I see that the code cache in the JVM is nearing its memory limits 47mb /assigned in 50 MB .On deploying more solr webapps to the server,Will i get any out of memory exceptions ? and will JVM freeze? How should this be handled? Regards Sujatha

Re: Scaling Solr - Suggestions !!

> Best > Erick > > On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:22 AM, Sujatha Arun > wrote: > > Now the reason ,I have used different webapps instead of a single one for > > the cores is ,while prototyping ,I discovered that ,when one of the cores > > index is corrupt ,the entir

Re: Scaling Solr - Suggestions !!

fic problem can be solved by replication and load balancing. > > Michael > > On Sat, 2012-04-28 at 13:24 +0530, Sujatha Arun wrote: > > Hello, > > > > *Background* :For each of our customers, we create 3 solr webapps with > > different search schema's,s

Scaling Solr - Suggestions !!

Hello, *Background* :For each of our customers, we create 3 solr webapps with different search schema's,serving different search requirements and we have about 70 customers.So we have about 210 webapps curently . *Hardware*: Single Server , one JVM , Heap memory 19GB ,Total Ram :32GB , Permgen

Range Queries -sfloat

Hello, I am having an issue with range query in solr 1.3 . query is price: [ 1 TO 20 ] is returning values out of this range ,like 23.00 AND 55.00 .The field type of the price field is sfloat . When I check this form admin Debug query ,I am seeing junk instead of price. example: price:[ 1 TO 2

Re: Solr cores issue

t; Best > Erick > > On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 12:22 AM, Sujatha Arun > wrote: > > yes ,I must have mis-copied and yes, i do have the conf folder per core > > with schema etc ... > > > > Because of this issue ,we have decided to have multiple webapps with > abo

Re: Solr cores issue

> > I suspect you've simply mis-copied something. > > Best > Erick > > On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 8:27 AM, Sujatha Arun wrote: > > I was migrating to cores from webapp ,and I was copying a bunch of > indexes > > from webapps to respective cores ,when I restarted

Re: Solr cores issue

On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Sujatha Arun wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Suppose I have several cores in a single webapp ,I have issue with Index > > beong corrupted in one core ,or schema /solrconfig of one core is not > well > > formed ,then entire webapp re

Solr cores issue

Hello, Suppose I have several cores in a single webapp ,I have issue with Index beong corrupted in one core ,or schema /solrconfig of one core is not well formed ,then entire webapp refused to load on server restart? Why does this happen? Regards Sujatha

Multicore -Create new Core request errors

Hello, When I issue this query to create a new Solr Core , I get the error message HTTP Status 500 - Can't find resource 'solrconfig.xml' in classpath or '/home/searchuser/searchinstances/multi_core_prototype/solr/conf/ http:// /multi_core_prototype/admin/cores?action=CREATE&name=coreX&instanceDi

Moving from Multiple webapps to Multi Cores -Solr 1.3

Hello All, On Protyping from moving from solr Multiple Webapps to Solr Multi Cores [1.3 Version both]..I am running into the following issues and Questions 1) We are primarily moving to Multicore because ,we saw the Permgen memory being increased ,each time we created a new solr webapp ,so t

Re: Permgen Space - GC

en. Accd. to this, > you should use both this and ClassUnload: > > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3717937/cmspermgensweepingenabled-vs-cmsclassunloadingenabled > > On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:59 PM, Sujatha Arun > wrote: > > When Loading multiple solr instances i

Re: Solr Cores

t; Best > Erick > > On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Sujatha Arun wrote: > > Hello, > > > > We have in production a number of individual solr Instnaces on a single > > JVM.As a result ,we see that the permgenSpace keeps increasing with each > > additional

Solr Cores

Hello, We have in production a number of individual solr Instnaces on a single JVM.As a result ,we see that the permgenSpace keeps increasing with each additional instance added. I would Like to know ,if we can have solr cores , instead of individual instances. - Is there any limit to the nu

Re: Solr Cloud Indexing

Erick Erickson > wrote: > > This only really makes sense if you don't have enough in-house resources > > to do your indexing locally, but it certainly is possible. > > > > Amazon's EC2 has been used, but really any hosting service should do. > > > > Best

Solr Cloud Indexing

Would it make sense to Index on the cloud and periodically [2-4 times /day] replicate the index at our server for searching .Which service to go with for solr Cloud Indexing ? Any good and tried services? Regards Sujatha

Acceptable Response Time

Hello, I am Looking into trigger point for sharding Indexes based on response time ,and would like to define an acceptable response time. Given a 3GB index ,when Can i think of sharding .The response times being variable based on the query and varies from 100ms to 600ms .We are running solr 1.3

Re: [Profiling] How to profile/tune Solr server

hi , I am planning to try Sematext Monitoring. Is there anything to watch out for ? Regards Sujatha On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 9:21 PM, wrote: > Hi Spark, > > 2009 there was a monitor from lucidimagination: > > http://www.lucidimagination.com/about/news/releases/lucid-imagination-releases-perfor

Re: Optimization /Commit memory

. > > > > My understanding is that during optimization an essentially new index is > built. Once complete it switches out the indexes and will throw away the > old one. (In Windows it may not throw away the old one until the next > Commit). > > > > JRJ > > >

Re: Optimization /Commit memory

Just one more thing ,when we are talking about Optimization , we are referring to HD free space for replicating the index (2 or 3 times the index size ) .what is role of RAM (OS) here? Regards Suajtha On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Sujatha Arun wrote: > Thanks that helps. > >

Re: OS Cache - Solr

w plus whatever information > currently segregates the instances. Then this would be much more > manageable. > > In other words, what is different about each of the 200 instances? Is the > schema for each essentially the same, as I am guessing? > > JRJ > > -----Original

Re: Optimization /Commit memory

gh performance is > required, I have not found that to be the case. > > This is just one of those "your mileage may vary" things. There is not a > single answer or formula that fits every situation. > > JRJ > > -Original Message- > From: Sujatha Arun

Re: OS Cache - Solr

nce. > > If you have 200 instances of Solr all accessing the same physical disk, the > results are not likely to be satisfactory - the disk head will go nuts > trying to handle all of the requests. > > JRJ > > -Original Message- > From: Sujatha Arun [mailto:suja.a...@gmai

Re: Optimization /Commit memory

rarily. > > How much disk space depends very much upon how big your index is in the > first place. A 2 to 3 times factor of the sum of your peak index file size > seems safe, to me. > > Solr uses only modest amounts of memory for the JVM for this stuff. > > JRJ > > --

Optimization /Commit memory

Do we require 2 or 3 Times OS RAM memory or Hard Disk Space while performing Commit or Optimize or Both? what is the requirement in terms of size of RAM and HD for commit and Optimize Regards Sujatha

  1   2   >