anted tlogs and another port where I wanted pull
types. Then set the policies accordingly and it is working for me.
You can try something similar if you like or if someone else replies, I can
also benefit from it.
Thanks,
Sandeep
On Thu, Apr 9, 2020, 10:36 AM saicharan.k...@spglobal.co
Hi,
You have used ! - not operator, so, the replicas would be created on all
nodes not having that property value (typeahead)
Thanks
On Wed, Apr 8, 2020, 4:21 PM saicharan.k...@spglobal.com <
saicharan.k...@spglobal.com> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> We are trying to apply the following collection sp
Hey,
Please change the precision in cluster preference for core to 1 instead of
10 and then give a try.
With current settings, 2 nodes are not treated different till they have a
difference of 10 cores.
Thanks,
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020, 2:09 AM Kudrettin Güleryüz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Running 7.3.1 on
I am not sure whether you have added triggers for nodelost and nodeadd
events
Action is taken based on triggers which have the execute plan. You can move
create replicas and also delete node in these triggers.
One more thing, since you are using solr 7.7 if you add move replica action
to the nod
hards get added to the just added node.
We would like to avoid the hardcoding of numbers and percentage and want to
restrict tlogs to certain nodes which would not be serving read requests
via specifying preferred replicas for serving requests (more like master
slave architecture of solr 4.X we currentl
as in solrcloud mode
temporarily while we populate the index on tlogs. We can do this in legacy
mode
We understand that we can have multiple tlogs as replicas to solve this but
wanted to know how we can stop this replication.
Thanks,
Sandeep
For me, these variants have worked ...
solrQuery.add("json.facet", "...");
solrQuery.setParam("json.facet", "...");
You get ...
QueryResponse.getResponse().get("facets");
SRK
On Thursday, January 5, 2017 1:19 PM, Jeffery Yuan
wrote:
Thanks for your response.
We definitely use solrQ
Hi,
I uploaded (upconfig) config (schema and solrconfig XMLs) to Zookeeper and then
linked (linkconfig) the confname to a collection name.
When I attempt to create a collection using the API like this
.../solr/admin/collections?action=CREATE&name=abc&numShards=1&collection.configName=abc
... it
59:00],detailLevel=9,prefixGridScanLevel=7))
SRK
On Thursday, November 24, 2016 9:02 PM, Alessandro Benedetti
wrote:
Hey Sandeep,
can you debug the query ( debugQuery=on) and show how the query is parsed ?
Cheers
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:38 PM, Sandeep Khanzode <
sandeep_kha
something in the syntax.
SRK
On Thursday, November 24, 2016 11:16 PM, Sandeep Khanzode
wrote:
Hi All, Erick,
Please suggest. Would like to use the ComplexPhraseQueryParser for searching
text (with wildcard) that may contain special characters.
For example ...John* should match John V
. Doe
SRK
On Thursday, November 24, 2016 5:57 PM, Sandeep Khanzode
wrote:
Hi,
This is the typical TextField with ...
SRK
On Thursday, November 24, 2016 1:38 AM, Reth RM
wrote:
what is the fieldType of those records?
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 4:18 AM
Z]'})
SRK
On Tuesday, November 22, 2016 9:41 PM, Erick Erickson
wrote:
_How_ does it "not work"? You haven't told us what you expect .vs.
what you get back.
Plus a sample doc that that violates your expectations (just the
dateRange field) would
also help.
Best,
Eri
Hi,
This is the typical TextField with ...
SRK
On Thursday, November 24, 2016 1:38 AM, Reth RM
wrote:
what is the fieldType of those records?
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 4:18 AM, Sandeep Khanzode
wrote:
Hi Erick,
I gave this a try.
These are my results
Hi,
I have a simple query that should intersect with dateRange1 and NOT be
contained within dateRange2. I have tried the following options:
WORKS:
+{!field f=dateRange1 op=Intersects v='[2016-11-22T12:01:00Z TO
2016-11-22T13:59:00Z]'} +(*:* -{!field f=dateRange2 op=Contains
v='[2016-11-22T12:01
r=true}name:"John D S*" ... fetches that record.
SRK
On Sunday, November 13, 2016 7:43 AM, Erick Erickson
wrote:
Right, for that kind of use case you want complexPhraseQueryParser,
see:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Other+Parsers#OtherParsers-ComplexPhraseQu
streaming expressions.
ThanksSandeep
On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 8:22 AM, sandeep mukherjee
wrote:
blockquote, div.yahoo_quoted { margin-left: 0 !important; border-left:1px
#715FFA solid !important; padding-left:1ex !important; background-color:white
!important; } Nope never got
cket for this.
>
> Joel Bernstein
> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>
> On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 6:23 PM, sandeep mukherjee <
> wiredcit...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
>
> > I have more progress since my last mail. I figured out that in the
> > StreamContext object ther
l be pretty good though.
In all this sounds like an XY problem, what's the use-case you're
trying to solve?
Best,
Erick
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 10:11 PM, Sandeep Khanzode
wrote:
> Hi Erick, Reth,
>
> The 'a\ b*' as well as the q.op=AND approach worked (successfu
i.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Other+Parsers#OtherParsers-ComplexPhraseQueryParser
>
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Sandeep Khanzode <
> sandeep_khanz...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> How does a search like abc* work in StrField. Since the entire thi
Hi,
How does a search like abc* work in StrField. Since the entire thing is stored
as a single token, is it a type of a trie structure that allows such wildcard
matching?
How can searches with space like 'a b*' be executed for text fields (tokenized
on whitespace)? If we specify this type of qu
me know if there is a better way to enable Basic Auth when using
StreamFactory as mentioned in my previous email.
Thanks much,Sandeep
On Wednesday, November 9, 2016 11:44 AM, sandeep mukherjee
wrote:
Hello everyone,
I trying to find the documentation for Basic Auth plugin for Solr
g "-h localhost".
-Bryan
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 1:05 PM, sandeep mukherjee <
wiredcit...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
> I followed the steps to make the solr SSL enabled. I'm able to hit solr
> at: https://localhost:8985/solr/problem/select?indent=on&q=*:*&wt=json And
&
Hello everyone,
I trying to find the documentation for Basic Auth plugin for Solr Streaming
expressions. But I'm not able to find it in the documentation anywhere. Could
you please point me in right direction of how to enable Basic auth for Solr
Streams?
I'm creating StreamFactory as follows: I
I followed the steps to make the solr SSL enabled. I'm able to hit solr at:
https://localhost:8985/solr/problem/select?indent=on&q=*:*&wt=json And for
accessing it through Solr Client I created it as
follows:System.setProperty("javax.net.ssl.keyStore",
"/path/to/solr/server/etc/solr-ssl.keystor
atures/fixes
> with OR, I think.
>
> Regards,
> Alex.
>
> Newsletter and resources for Solr beginners and intermediates:
> http://www.solr-start.com/
>
>
> On 26 September 2016 at 16:56, Sandeep Khanzode
> wrote:
>> Hi Alex,
>> It seems
:09 PM, Sandeep Khanzode
wrote:
Yup. That works. So does (*:* NOT ...)
Thanks, Alex. SRK
On Monday, September 26, 2016 3:03 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch
wrote:
Try field2:value2 OR (*:* -field1=value1)
There is a magic in negative query syntax that breaks down when it
gets more
n the mailing list a bunch of
times, though the discussions are hard to find by title.
Regards,
Alex.
Newsletter and resources for Solr beginners and intermediates:
http://www.solr-start.com/
On 26 September 2016 at 16:06, Sandeep Khanzode
wrote:
> Hi,
> If I query for
> -field1=va
Hi,
If I query for
-field1=value1 ... I get, say, 100 records
and if I query for
field2:value2 ... I may get 200 records
I would assume that if I query for
-field1:value1 OR field2:value2
... I should get atleast 100 records (assuming they overlap, if not, upto 300
records). I am assuming tha
Thanks a lot, Bram. I will try that ... SRK
On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 11:57 AM, Bram Van Dam
wrote:
On 21/09/16 05:40, Sandeep Khanzode wrote:
> How can I specify JSON Facets in SolrJ? The below facet query for example ...
SolrQuery query = new SolrQuery();
query.
reference to this stuff is:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Local+Parameters+in+Queries
> But that page doesn't address the implications for when the syntax is a
> clause of a larger query instead of being the whole query (i.e. has "{!"...
> but but
Hello,
How can I specify JSON Facets in SolrJ? The below facet query for example ...
&json.facet={
facet1: {
type: query,
q: "field1:value1 AND field2:value2",
facet:
{
facet1sub1: {
type: query,
q: "{!field f=mydate op=Intersects}2016-09-08T08:00:00",
facet:
{
id:
{
type:
ead need to put it in the special "v"
local-param. e.g.:
-{!field f=schedule op=Contains v='[2016-08-26T12:00:12Z TO
2016-08-26T15:00:12Z]'}
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 8:15 AM Sandeep Khanzode
wrote:
> This is what I get ...
> { "responseHeader": { "status
json", "_": "1474373612202" } }, "error": { "msg":
"Invalid Date in Date Math String:'[2016-08-26T12:00:12Z'", "code": 400 }}
SRK
On Tuesday, September 20, 2016 5:34 PM, David Smiley
wrote:
It should, I think...
For Solr 6.1.0
This works .. -{!field f=schedule op=Intersects}2016-08-26T12:00:56Z
This works .. {!field f=schedule op=Contains}[2016-08-26T12:00:12Z TO
2016-08-26T15:00:12Z]
Why does this not work?-{!field f=schedule op=Contains}[2016-08-26T12:00:12Z TO
2016-08-26T15:00:12Z]
SRK
Have been trying to understand this for a while ...How can I specify NOT clause
in the following query?{!field f=schedule op=Intersects}[2016-08-26T12:30:00Z
TO 2016-08-26T18:30:00Z]{!field f=schedule op=Contains}[2016-08-26T12:30:00Z TO
2016-08-26T18:30:00Z]Like, without LocalParams, we can spe
Hi, Can someone please reply to my query? Let me know if it is not
understandable. Thanks.
SRK
On Monday, September 19, 2016 6:00 PM, Sandeep Khanzode
wrote:
Hi,
Can I not query like this?
{!field f=schedule1 op=Contains}[1988-10-22T18:30:00Z TO *] AND
-schedule3:[1988-10-22T18:30
Hi,
Can I not query like this?
{!field f=schedule1 op=Contains}[1988-10-22T18:30:00Z TO *] AND
-schedule3:[1988-10-22T18:30:00Z TO *] AND -schedule2:[1988-10-22T18:30:00Z TO
*] I keep getting parsing and date math related errors.
If I change it to ...schedule1:[1988-10-22T18:30:00Z TO *] AND
-sc
Hi,
Can someone please direct me to some documentation that shows how to do this
... ?
I need to write a non-trivial function that will return a new custom (not in
schema) field but which is more complicated than a simple sum/avg/etc.
I want to create a function that looks at a few dateranges in
, Sandeep Khanzode
wrote:
Hello,
There are quite a few links that detail the difference between StrField and
TextField. Also links that explain that, even though the field is indexed, it
is not tokenized and stored as a single keyword, as can be verified by the
debug analysis on Solr admin and
Hello,
There are quite a few links that detail the difference between StrField and
TextField. Also links that explain that, even though the field is indexed, it
is not tokenized and stored as a single keyword, as can be verified by the
debug analysis on Solr admin and CURL debugQuery options.
Wh
results* in either ascending (asc) or
descending (desc) order.
Thanks,
Sandeep
On 11 July 2016 at 11:13, Naveen Pajjuri wrote:
> Hi,
> If i apply some sorting order on solr. when are the Documents sorted.
>
>1. are documents sorted after fetching the results ?
>2. or
e to add, do let me know. I will be grateful.
Many Thanks,
Sandeep
On 29 April 2016 at 14:54, Joel Bernstein wrote:
> We really still need to know more about your use case. In particular what
> types of questions will you be asking of the data? It's useful to do this
> in plain engl
ulation will be
faster.
Any guidance will be good..
Thanks,
Sandeep
ct of:\n 0.09805807 =
(MATCH) sum of:\n0.09805807 = (MATCH)
ConstantScore(person_full_name:*louis*), product of:\n 1.0 =
boost\n 0.09805807 = queryNorm\n 0.125 = coord(1/8)\n",
"11470331": "\n0.012257258 = (MATCH) product of:\n 0.09805807 =
(MATCH) sum of:\n0.09805807 = (MATCH)
ConstantScore(person_full_name:*louis*), product of:\n 1.0 =
boost\n 0.09805807 = queryNorm\n 0.125 = coord(1/8)\n"
},
SO THE ISSUE IS THAT SOMETIMES IT IS TAKING FILTER BUT NOT ALWAYS. What
could be the reason.
Here is tokenizer and fileter I am using:
Any help on this would be appriciable.
Thanks,
Sandeep
"start": "September 2014",
"location": "Santiago, Chile",
"duration": "6 months",
"organization": [
{
"name": "SAP",
"profile_url": "http://www.linkedin.com/company/1115";
}
]
}
],
"education": [
{
"start": "2010",
"end": "2011",
"name": "Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez",
"degrees": [
"Master en Innovación"
]
}
]
}
Thanks,
Sandeep
Hello,
I have Java beans with parent-child relation that I am trying to index
using @Field annotation (copying the sample code below).
I see that https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1945 is open. Is
there any other way or document that describes how to use solrj annotations
to index ne
accomplish the read-only
replica of the entire solr cloud cluster?
Thanks!
Tikoo
From: Sandeep Tikoo
Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2014 9:43 PM
To: 'solr-user@lucene.apache.org'
Subject: SolrCould read-only replicas
Hi-
I have been reading up on SolrCloud and it seems that it is not
Hi-
I have been reading up on SolrCloud and it seems that it is not possible to
have a cross-datacenter read-only slave anymore but wanted to ask here to be
sure.
We currently have a pre Solr 4.0 installation with the master instance in our
US mid-west datacenter. The datacenter in Europe has r
and analyzer but was trying
to view if solr has any inbuilt libraries, so that no cross language
integration might be required.
Again Wil get back if something works or not works.
@susheel,
Thanks will try to see if that works.
Thanks,
Sandeep.
On Sep 8, 2014 12:54 PM, "Sandeep B A" wr
to do it?
Is it possible to integrate nltk for solr? If yes how to do it? Because I
found sentence tokenizers for English in nltk.
Thanks,
Sandeep
On Sep 5, 2014 8:10 PM, "Sandeep B A" wrote:
> Sorry for typo it is solr 4.9.0 instead of sold 4.9.0
> On Sep 5, 2014 7:48 PM,
Sorry for typo it is solr 4.9.0 instead of sold 4.9.0
On Sep 5, 2014 7:48 PM, "Sandeep B A" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was looking out the options for sentence tokenizers default in solr but
> could not find it. Does any one used? Integrated from any other language
> tokenizer
Hi,
I was looking out the options for sentence tokenizers default in solr but
could not find it. Does any one used? Integrated from any other language
tokenizers to solr. Example python etc.. Please let me know.
Thanks and regards,
Sandeep
I am using an classic ASP 3.0 application and would like to implement SOLR
onto it. My database is SQL server and also it connects to AS/400 using
batch processing. Can someone suggest a starting point?
*RegardsSandeep*
Hi Joel,
Thanks a lot for the information - I haven't worked with PostFilter's
before but found an example at
http://java.dzone.com/articles/custom-security-filtering-solr.
Will try it over the next few days and come back if still have questions.
Thanks again!
Keep Walking,
~ Sa
, we can
throw more hardware to the index - but the index will still be only on a
single machine for atleast 6 months.
Regards,
Sandeep Gupta
Yes.. it is not related to this particular mail thread. I will post
separate mail.
Thanks
Sandeep
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Jack Krupansky wrote:
> Not in just a few words. Do you have specific questions? I mean none of
> that relates to parsing of fq, the topic of this particular
Thanks Jack for detailing out the parser logic.
Would it be possible for you to say something more about filter cache code
flow... sometimes we do not use fq parameter in query string and pass the
raw query
Regards
Sandeep
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Jack Krupansky wrote:
> St
to the index - but the index will still be only
on a single machine for atleast 6 months.
Best Regards,
Sandeep Gupta
ith wild card) then
search result is not returning the keyword of type colorology... (as in
case If I use color* then I am getting this word)
So any suggestions as how I can achieve this Or its not possible.
Thanks
Sandeep
starting of tomcat read this file after host-manager.xml
Thanks
-Sandeep
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 3:40 PM, PeterKerk wrote:
> I can now approach http://localhost:8080/solr-4.3.1/#/, thanks!!
>
> I also noticed you mentioning something about a data import handler.
>
> Now,
This problem looks to me because of solr logging ...
see below detail description (taken one of the mail thread)
-
Solr 4.3.0 and later does not have ANY slf4j jarfiles in the .war file,
so you need to put them in your
Hi Alex,
great please go ahead..
-Sandeep
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Ali, Saqib wrote:
> Hello Alex,
>
> This sounds like an excellent idea! :)
>
> Saqib
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 8:11 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch
> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
>
T_HOME\lib dir, but for logging mechanism I have to do. I tried
to put all the 5 jars into this folder and removed from TOMCAT lib.. but
then I got the error.
In Ideal scenario, we should not put all the jar files related to solr into
TOMCAT lib dir
Regards
Sandeep
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at
SQL. That's the best starting point.
>
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> -Original Message- From: fabio1605
> Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2013 4:55 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Newbie SolR - Need advice
>
>
> Hi Sandeep
>
> Thank you
s to match the results that you're currently getting
from the database. There is lots of info available for Solr on web and do
check Lucidworks' Solr Reference Guide.
http://docs.lucidworks.com/display/solr/Apache+Solr+Reference+Guide;jsessionid=16ED0DB3B6F6BE8CEC6E6CDB207DBC49
Best of
t
*is* going to be a bumpy ride at the start but *definitely* a sensational
one.
Good Luck,
Sandeep
On 2 July 2013 17:09, fabio1605 wrote:
> Thanks guys
>
> So SolR is actually a database replacement for mssql... Am I right
>
>
> We have a lot of perl scripts that contain
g
to your question.
1) field definition in schema.xml
2) solr query url
3) parser config from solrconfig.xml
Thanks,
Sandeep
On 27 June 2013 10:41, Srinivasa Chegu wrote:
> Hi team,
>
> When the user enter search term as "h.e.r.b.a.l" in the search textbox
> and click on
ou did the same migration.
Thanks
Sandeep
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Upayavira wrote:
> I have done this - upgraded a 1.4 index to 3.x then on to 4.x. It
> worked, but...
>
> New field types have been introduced over time that facilitate new
> functionality. To co
lots of people (in this mailing list) will have practical
experience
as which type of singleton pattern need to be implement for creation of
SolrServer object.
Waiting for some comments in this front ?
Regards
Sandeep
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 6/25/2013 11:52
/solr/Solrj#HttpSolrServer)
So I am planning to have my Server class as singleton.
Please advice little bit in this front also.
Regards
Sandeep
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:16 PM, André Widhani wrote:
> fwiw, I can confirm that Solr 4.x can definitely not read indexes created
> with 1.4.
>
&
/solr/Solrj#HttpSolrServer)
So I am planning to have my Server class as singleton.
Please advice little bit in this front also.
Regards
Sandeep
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:16 PM, André Widhani wrote:
> fwiw, I can confirm that Solr 4.x can definitely not read indexes created
> with 1.4.
>
&
create Solr server object via CommonsHttpSolrServer() so I
am planning to use now HttpSolrServer API>
Please let me know the suggestion for above points also what are the other
factors I need to take care while considering the migration.
Regards
Sandeep
rkaround was to add _version_ field in
schema, which I had done but no luck. I know it might be unrelated but I am
just trying all my options.
Thanks again,
Sandeep
On 5 June 2013 00:41, Chris Hostetter wrote:
>
> : However, we haven't yet implemented SolrCloud and still relying on
s for the upgrade in solrconfig.xml and is pasted
below. Please can someone take a look and let me know what the issue is.
The same config was working fine on Solr 4.0 (as well as Solr 1.4.1).
Thanks,
Sandeep
p.s: We'll be upgrading to SolrCloud in the next release of the project but
this relea
*org.apache.solr.search.SyntaxError: Cannot parse
'*mm_state_code:(**TX)*': Encountered " ":" ": "" at line 1, column 14.
Was expecting one of:*
This suggests to me that you kept the df parameter in the query hence it
was forming mm_state_code:mm_state_code:(TX), can you try exactly they way
I gav
>From the response you've mentioned it appears to me that the query term TX
is searched against sa_site_city instead of mm_state_code.
Can you try your query like below:
http://xx.xx.xx.xx/solr/collection1/select?q=*mm_state_code:(**TX)*
&wt=xml&indent=true&facet=true&facet.field=sa_site_city&debu
I doubt if there is any straight out of the box feature that supports this
requirement, you will probably need to handle this at the index time.
You can play around with Function Queries
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FunctionQuery for any such feature.
On 22 May 2013 16:37, Sam Lee wrote:
> I ha
x27;t mentioned which
field you want to search against. That field should be defined in df
parameter instead of sa_property_id.
Can you post example solr document you're indexing?
-Sandeep
On 22 May 2013 14:28, samabhiK wrote:
> Ok my bad.
>
> I do have a default field defined
Thanks Erick for your suggestion.
Turns out I won't be going that route after all as the highlighter
component is quite complicated - to follow and to override - and not much
time left in hand so did it the manual (dirty) way.
Beat Regards,
Sandeep
On 22 May 2013 12:21, Erick Erickson
ifferent types but only
> one value is indexed in them (so no multiValue is required and it works
> perfectly).
>
>
>
>
> On 05/22/2013 11:18 AM, Sandeep Mestry wrote:
>
>> Did you use the debugQuery=true in solr console to see how the query is
>> being interpret
/>
>
>
> Id
> **Suggestion
>|
>
> My query is somthing like : Suggestion:"Olive Oil".
>
> The result is 9 documents, wich all has the same score "11.287682", even
> if they had been indexed with
> In my case where I only need to boost the whole document (not a specific
> field), do I have to activate the << omitNorms="false" >> for all the
> fields in the schema ?
>
>
>
>
> On 05/22/2013 10:41 AM, Oussama Jilal wrote:
>
>> Thank you
is not clear from your message is whether you need better scoring or
better sorting. so, additionally, you can consider adding a secondary sort
parameter for the docs having the same score.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CommonQueryParameters#sort
HTH,
Sandeep
On 22 May 2013 09:21, Oussama Jilal
hanks,
Sandeep
On 21 May 2013 16:46, Steve Rowe wrote:
> The 4.0 solr-core jar is available in Maven Central: <
> http://search.maven.org/#artifactdetails%7Corg.apache.solr%7Csolr-core%7C4.0.0%7Cjar
> >
>
> Steve
>
> On May 21, 2013, at 11:26 AM, Sandeep Mestry wrote:
Hi Steve,
Solr 4.0 - mentioned in the subject.. :-)
Thanks,
Sandeep
On 21 May 2013 14:58, Steve Rowe wrote:
> Sandeep,
>
> What version of Solr are you using?
>
> Steve
>
> On May 21, 2013, at 6:55 AM, Sandeep Mestry wrote:
>
> > Hi Shawn,
> >
> &
wever I do not think this is
the ideal solution.
Thanks,
Sandeep
On 20 May 2013 15:18, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 5/20/2013 8:01 AM, Sandeep Mestry wrote:
> > And I do remember the discussion on the forum about dropping the name
> > *apache* from solr jars. If that's what c
e-solr-core.jar?
Many Thanks,
Sandeep
Thanks Upayavira for that valuable suggestion.
I believe overriding highlight component should be the way forward.
Could you tell me if there is any existing example or which methods I
should particularly override?
Thanks,
Sandeep
On 20 May 2013 12:47, Upayavira wrote:
> If you are say
to change my search
results, the requirement is only to provide a highlight if a field is
matched for all the query terms.
Thanks,
Sandeep
On 20 May 2013 12:02, Jaideep Dhok wrote:
> If you know all fields that need to be queried, you can rewrite it as -
> (assuming, f1, f2 are the fiel
* terms
match.
Thanks,
Sandeep
On 20 May 2013 11:40, Jaideep Dhok wrote:
> Sandeep,
> If you AND all keywords, that should be OK?
>
> Thanks
> Jaideep
>
>
> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Sandeep Mestry
> wrote:
>
> > Dear All,
> >
> > I have
. Any document
containing just one or two terms is not a match.
Thanks,
Sandeep
(p.s: I haven't enabled the highlighting feature yet on this config and
will be doing so only if that will fulfil the requirement I have mentioned
above.)
Hello Jack,
Thanks for pointing the issues out and for your valuable suggestion. My
preliminary tests were okay on search but I will be doing more testing to
see if this has impacted any other searches.
Thanks once again and have a nice sunny weekend,
Sandeep
On 17 May 2013 05:35, Jack
t able to parse a comma with a space.
Thanks again Jack, please let me know in case you need more inputs from my
side.
Best Regards,
Sandeep
On 16 May 2013 18:03, Jack Krupansky wrote:
> Could you show us the full query URL - spaces must be encoded in URL query
> parameters.
>
> A
Why solr is not searching for 10 in that case just like it did when the
query was (title:(,10))?
- And why other filter queries did not show up (collection:assets) in debug
section?
Thanks,
Sandeep
On 16 May 2013 13:57, Jack Krupansky wrote:
> You haven't indicated any problem here! W
ets) which appear correctly but they do not appear in case 1
above.
I can't make this as part of the query parameter as that needs to be
searched against multiple fields.
Can someone suggest a fix in this case please. I'm using Solr 4.0.
Many Thanks,
Sandeep
ses modified merge sort,
could you tell me which algorithm solr follows for sorting logic and also
if there is any other approach I can take?
Many Thanks,
Sandeep
That's not ideal.
Can you post solrconfig.xml?
On 3 May 2013 07:41, "vicky desai" wrote:
> Hi sandeep,
>
> I made the changes u mentioned and tested again for the same set of docs
> but
> unfortunately the commit time increased.
>
>
>
> --
> View th
Hi Vicky,
I faced this issue as well and after some playing around I found the
autowarm count in cache sizes to be a problem.
I changed that from a fixed count (3072) to percentage (10%) and all commit
times were stable then onwards.
HTH,
Sandeep
On 2 May 2013 16:31, Alexandre Rafalovitch
> grouping, but I doubt it.
>
> You'll need two queries I'd guess.
>
> Best
> Erick
>
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Sandeep Mestry
> wrote:
> > Dear Experts,
> >
> > I have a requirement for the exact matches and applying alphabetical
&g
uot; />
>
>
>
>
> stemEnglishPossessive="0" generateWordParts="1" generateNumberParts="1"
> catenateWords="1" catenateNumbers="1" catenateAll="1" splitOnCaseChange="1"
> splitOnNumerics="0" preserveOriginal="1" />
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Many Thanks in advance,
> Sandeep
>
1 - 100 of 182 matches
Mail list logo
