Collection Creation across DC

Hello, Can we create a collection across data Center ( shard replica is in a different data center) for HA ? Thanks Revas

Re: when to use docvalue

Thanks, Erick. Its just when we enable both index=true and docValues=true, it increases the index time by 2x atleast for full re-index. On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 2:30 PM Erick Erickson wrote: > Revas: > > Facet queries are just queries that are constrained by the total result >

Re: when to use docvalue

Erick, Can you also explain how to optimize facet query and range facets as they dont use docValues and contribute to higher response time? On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 5:55 PM Erick Erickson wrote: > They are _absolutely_ able to be used together. Background: > > “In the bad old days”, there was no

Re: facets & docValues

re spaced far enough apart that the warming completes before a new > searcher starts warming. > > > Joel Bernstein > http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ > > > On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 10:27 AM Revas wrote: > > > Hi Erick, Thanks for the explanation and advise. With face

Re: facets & docValues

t get adequate response time even under fairly light query loads > as a general rule. > > Best, > Erick > > > On Apr 16, 2020, at 12:08 PM, Revas wrote: > > > > Hi Erick, You are correct, we have only about 1.8M documents so far and > > turning on the inde

Re: facets & docValues

t I think that’s the root issue here. > > Best, > Erick > > > On Apr 14, 2020, at 11:51 PM, Revas wrote: > > > > We have faceting fields that have been defined as indexed=false, > > stored=false and docValues=true > > > > However we use a lot of subfa

facets & docValues

We have faceting fields that have been defined as indexed=false, stored=false and docValues=true However we use a lot of subfacets using json facets and facet ranges using facet.queries. We see that after every soft-commit our performance worsens and performs ideal between commits how is that d

searcher

Hi I am seeing from my logs searcher referenced as main and realtime .Do they correspond to hard vs sofCommit. I do not see the co-relation to that based on our commit settings. Opening [Searcher@538abc62[xx_shard1_replica2] main] Opening [Searcher@2e151991[ xx _shard1_replica1] realtime] Thank

Re: DocValue field & commit

wered > machine. The hard commit will trigger segment merging, which is CPU and > I/O intensive. If > you’re using a machine that can’t afford the cycles to be taken up by > merging, that could account > for what you see, but new searchers are being opened every 2 seconds >

Re: DocValue field & commit

towarming. That should smooth out > the delay your user’s experience when commits happen. > > Best, > Erick > > > On Mar 30, 2020, at 4:06 PM, Revas wrote: > > > > Thanks, Eric. > > > > 1) We are using dynamic string field for faceting where indexing

Re: DocValue field & commit

ery 2 secs. On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 4:06 PM Revas wrote: > Thanks, Eric. > > 1) We are using dynamic string field for faceting where indexing =false > and stored=false . By default docValues are enabled for primitive fields > (solr 6.6.), so not explicitly defined in schema. Do

Re: DocValue field & commit

I’d double check <1> first. > > Best, > Erick > > > On Mar 30, 2020, at 12:20 PM, sujatha arun wrote: > > > > A facet heavy query which uses docValue fields for faceting returns > about > > 5k results executes between 10ms to 5 secs and the 5 secs time seems to > > coincide with after a hard commit. > > > > Does that have any relation? Why the fluctuation in execution time? > > > > Thanks, > > Revas > >

Re: Overlapping onDeckSearchers=2

Thanks for the repsonse .What happens in this scenario? Does the commit happen in this case or does the search server hang or just throws an error without committing Regards Sujatha On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 11:41 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote: > : When i run 2 -3 commits parallely to diff instances

Overlapping onDeckSearchers=2

PERFORMANCE WARNING: Overlapping onDeckSearchers=2 What is the Best approach to solve this Regards revas

Re: Migration to Solr 1.4

Thanks ,Erik. On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 4:34 PM, Erik Hatcher wrote: > > On Jan 8, 2010, at 4:14 AM, revas wrote: > >> I would like to know if by just copying the solr.war file to my existing >> solr 1.3 installation ,lucene version is also upgraded to current 2.9 ? >

Migration to Solr 1.4

Hello, I would like to know if by just copying the solr.war file to my existing solr 1.3 installation ,lucene version is also upgraded to current 2.9 ? I believe reindex is not necessary ,is that correct? Is there anything else apart form this that i need to do to upgrade to the latest lucen

Help on this parsed query

*simple:peRsonal* * * *simple:peRsonal* * * *MultiPhraseQuery(simple:"(person pe) rsonal")* * * *simple:"(person pe) rsonal"* what is this multiphrase query ,why is this a phrase query istead of simple query? Regards Revas

field type definition

y both query and index analyzer .Is this correct? Regards Revas

solr Analyzer help

the above for German language analysis am i to use the standardard anlyzer with German filter factory and German stemmers ? are there more language specific tokenizers in lucene and if so what are the steps to integrate into solr? Regards Revas

Re: Customizing results

Hi Michael, What is GNU gettext and how this can be used in a multilanguage scenario? Regards Revas On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 8:10 PM, Michael Ludwig wrote: > Manepalli, Kalyan schrieb: > >> Hi, >> I am trying to customize the response that I receive from Solr. In the >&g

Re: spellcheck /too many open files

Thanks On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar < shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 4:32 PM, revas wrote: > > > Thanks ShalinWhen we use the external file dictionary (if there is > > one),then it should work fine ,right for spell

Re: spellcheck /too many open files

2009 at 2:56 PM, revas wrote: > > > But the spell check componenet uses the n-gram analyzer and henc should > > work > > for any language ,is this correct ,also we can refer an extern dictionary > > for suggestions ,could this be in any language? > > > > Yes

Re: spellcheck /too many open files

But the spell check componenet uses the n-gram analyzer and henc should work for any language ,is this correct ,also we can refer an extern dictionary for suggestions ,could this be in any language? The open files is not because of spell check as we have not yet implemented this yet, every time we

spellcheck /too many open files

,will the open files be closed automatically or would i have to reindex to close the open files or how do i close the already opened files.This is on linux with solr 1.3 and tomcat 5.5 Regards Revas

Re: query issue /special character and case

On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar < shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 9:48 AM, revas wrote: > > > Hi , > > > > When i give a query like the following ,why does it become a phrase query > > as shown below? > > T

query issue /special character and case

in not in windows OS. Any pointers Regards Revas

Compund file format

What is the draw back in using compunf file format for indexing when we have several webapps in a sinle container Regards Sujatha

Solr Cache Usage

Regards Revas

Multi-language support

above languages .Will search be same across all the above cases? thanks revas

Analyzers and stemmer

Hi , With respect to language support in solr ,we have analyzers for some languages and stemmers for certain langauges.Do we say that solr supports this particular language only if we have both analyzer and stemmer for the language or also for which we have analyzer but not stemmer Regards Suja

Facets drill down

Hi, I typically issue a facetdrill down query thus q=somequery and Facetfield:facetval . Is there any issues with the above approach as opposed to &fq=facetfield:value in terms of memory consumption and the use of cache. Regards Suajatha

caching

If i don't explicity set any default query in the solrconfig.xml for caching and make use of the default config file,does solr do the caching automatically based on the query? Thanks

Re: stop word search

you do need to reindex after removing the stopword filter > from the configuration. When you indexed the first time using > the stopword filter, the words were NOT indexed, so they won't > be found now that they're getting through the query analyzer. > > Best > Erick >

Re: stop word search

ish? > > Best > Erick > > > > On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 7:40 AM, revas wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I have a query like this > > > > content:the AND iuser_id:5 > > > > which means return all docs of user id 5 which have the word "the&q

stop word search

Hi, I have a query like this content:the AND iuser_id:5 which means return all docs of user id 5 which have the word "the" in content .Since 'the' is a stop word ,this query executes as just user_id :5 inspite of the "AND" clause ,Whereas the expected result here is since there is no result for

Sharding question

Hi, If i were to add a second server for sharding once ,the first server reaches its limit and then if i need to update any document,how can i figure out on which server the document is located? Regards Sujatha

muticore setup with tomcat

Hi, I am trying to do amulticore set up.. I added the following from the 1.3 solr download to new dir called multicore core0 ,core1,solr.xml and solr.war in the tomcat context fragment i have defined as http://localhost:8080/multicore/admin http://localhost:8080/multicore/admin/core0 Th

Luke request handler

Hi, I just want to confirm my understanding of luke request handler. It gives us the raw lucene index tokens on a field by field basis. What should be the query to return all tokens for a field . Is there any way to return all the token across all fields Regards Revas

Re: Solr and Zend Lucene

The luke request handler returns all the tokens from the index ,is this correct? On 3/5/09, revas wrote: > > We will be using sqllite for db.This can be used for a cd version where we > need to provide search > > > On 3/5/09, Grant Ingersoll wrote: >> >> >&g

Re: Solr and Zend Lucene

We will be using sqllite for db.This can be used for a cd version where we need to provide search On 3/5/09, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > > > On Mar 5, 2009, at 3:10 AM, revas wrote: > > Hi, >> >> I have a requirement where i need to search offline.We are thinking of

Re: Number of webapps

ight > > need a different URL depending on the version of Tomcat you're > > running). > > > > Michael > > > > On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 11:42 AM, revas wrote: > > > thanks will try that .I also have the war file for each solr instance > in > >

change the lucene version

Hi, If i need to change the lucene version of solr ,then how can we do this? Regards Revas

Solr and Zend Lucene

Zend lucene is not able to open the solr index files ,the error being unsupported format. The final option is to reindex using zend lucene and read the index tokens ,but then facets are not supported by zend-lucene Any body done something similar,please give your thoughts or pointers Regards Revas

Re: Number of webapps

thanks will try that .I also have the war file for each solr instance in the home directory of the instance ,would that be the problem ? if i were to have common war file for n instances ,would there be any issue? regards revas On 2/25/09, Michael Della Bitta wrote: > > It's possi

Number of webapps

Hi I am sure this question has been repeated many times over and there has been several generic answers ,but i am looking for specific answers. I have a single server whose configuration i give below,this being the only server we have at present ,the requirement is everytime we create a new websi