lts that have both words, or one or the
> other.
>
> Thanks,
> - Noel
>
> -Original Message-
> From: "Tom Hill"
> Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 6:39pm
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Searching solr with a two word query
>
> It wi
is give me results that have both words, or one or the
other.
Thanks,
- Noel
-Original Message-
From: "Tom Hill"
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 6:39pm
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Searching solr with a two word query
It will probably be clearer if you don'
gt; my query, but Im would like similar matches with either word as a single
> result. Is there another value I can use? Or maybe I should use another
> query parser?
>
> Thanks.
> - Noel
>
> -Original Message-
> From: "Erick Erickson"
> Sent: Monday, Septem
uld use another query parser?
Thanks.
- Noel
-Original Message-
From: "Erick Erickson"
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 10:05am
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Searching solr with a two word query
Here's an excellent description of the Lucene query operators a
Here is my raw query:
q=opening+excellent+AND+presentation_id%3A294+AND+type%3Ablob&version=1.3&json.nl=map&rows=10&start=0&wt=xml&hl=true&hl.fl=text&hl.simple.pre=&hl.simple.post=<%2Fspan>&hl.fragsize=0&hl.mergeContiguous=false&debugQuery=on
and here is what I get on the debugQuery:
−
openi
For some reason, when I run a query that has only two words in it, I get back
repeating results of the last word. If I were to search for something like
"good tonight", I'll get results like:
good tonight
tonight good
tonight
tonight
tonight
tonight
tonight
tonight
Basically, the first word if
You're right, it would be better to just give it a sortable numerical value.
For now I gave time_code a sdouble type and see if it sorted, and it did.
However all the 0's are trimmed, but that shouldn't be a problem unless it were
to truncate any values past the hundreds column.
Hello, I seem to be having a problem with sorting. I have a string field
(time_code) that I want to order by. When the results come up, it displays the
results differently from relevance which I would assume, but the results aren't
ordered. The data in time_code came from a numeric decimal with
Thanks, that's exactly the problem. I've tried different types, even a
fieldType that had no tokenizers and that didn't work. However, text just gives
me my results as wanted.
-Original Message-
From: "dan sutton"
Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 12:06pm
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
S
Here's my request:
q=ASA+AND+minisite_id%3A36&version=1.3&json.nl=map&rows=10&start=0&wt=json&hl=true&hl.fl=%2A&hl.simple.pre=%3Cspan+class%3D%22hl%22%3E&hl.simple.post=%3C%2Fspan%3E&hl.fragsize=0&hl.mergeContiguous=false
And here's what happened:
It didn't return results, even when I applied an a
Hi, I need help with highlighting fields that would match a query. So far, my
results only highlight if the field is from all_text, and I would like it to
use other fields. It simply isn't the case if I just turn highlighting on. Any
ideas why it only applies to all_text? Here is my schema:
Hello,
How am I able to highlight a field that contains a specific value? If I have a
field called type, how am I able to highlight the rows whose values contain
something like "title"?
like "To be or not to be" with stop words
enabled?
- I use synonyms for certain keywords. However, when I search for a specific
phrase which does contain synonyms, results with the synonyms rank higher than
the ones that have the exact term. How can that be fixed?
Thanks,
Noel
13 matches
Mail list logo