cet:{sum:"sum(amount)"},field:city,mincount:1}}},field:name,mincount:1}}},start:'NOW-2YEARS/DAY',field:date,gap:'%2B1DAYS'}}}
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 6:50 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 6:33 PM, naga sharathrayapati
> wrote:
> > In order t
In order to improve the query time of nested faceting query (json facet
api), have used 'docValues' in the schema,optimized index and increased
cache sizes(no evictions)
I still cannot be bring the query time to less than 1 sec.
is there anything that i can do that can improve the performance?
is it possible to specify facet.method with json nested faceting query?
would like to see if there would be a performance improvement using methods
Is it possible to clear the cache through query?
I need this for performance valuation.
lexible if you can de-normlize your
> data
> rather than try to make Solr work like an RDBMS. Of course it goes against
> the training of all DB Admins, but it's often the best option.
>
> So have you explored denormalizing and do you know it's not a viable
> option?
&
Is there any chance of this feature(merge the results to create a composite
document) coming out in the next release 5.3 ?
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Upayavira wrote:
> You can do what are called "pseudo joins", which are eqivalent to a
> nested query in SQL. You get back data from one cor
Do we need to specify stored='true' even when we specify docValues='true'
in the schema
is docValues not the alternate of stored?
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 8/13/2015 9:07 AM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> > No. But how do they default to "true"? In the fieldType? Which
what if i do something like this in the schema
will the filed name be stored? or not stored? as i have not specified in
the schema as stored='true'/'false'.
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Erick Erickson
wrote:
> No. But how do they default to "true"? In the fieldType? Which will be
> poten
JVM-Memory has gone up from 3% to 17.1%
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 12:10 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 8/7/2015 10:25 AM, naga sharathrayapati wrote:
> > i have added docValues="true" to my existing schema and I have seen
> > exponential increase in the size of the index.
&g
i have added docValues="true" to my existing schema and I have seen
exponential increase in the size of the index.
The reason in going with docValues is to improve the faceting query time.
schema:
Is this ok? am i doing anything wrong in the schema?
indexing the whole data (worth hours) and we have gone with
good number of shards but there is a rapid increase of size in data over
the past few days, do you think is it worth logging a ticket?
On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Upayavira wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 1, 2015, at 10:30
I have an exception with one of the document after indexing 6 mil documents
out of 10 mil, is there any way i can avoid re indexing the 6 mil
documents?
I also see that there are few documents that are deleted (based on the
count) while indexing, is there a way to identify what are those documents
try these
total sum of individual items:
/select?q=*:*&wt=json&indent=true&rows=0&json.facet={itemprice:{terms:{facet:{sum:"sum(price)"},field:item,limit:100,mincount:1}}}
sum of all the items:
/select?q=*:*&wt=json&indent=true&rows=0&json.facet={sum:"sum(price)"}
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 6:12
Yonik,
Did you see this issue with 5.2 as well or only 5.1?
Thanks,
Naga
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 9:15 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 8:03 PM, Nagasharath
> wrote:
> > Is there a jira logged for this issue?
>
> * SOLR-7781: JSON Facet API: Terms facet on string/text fields w
Hey,
I understand that "DocExpirationUpdateProcessorFactory" in the config.xml
can be specified to delete documents based on the expiration.
I would like to understand whether there is a chance of these deleted
documents getting re-indexed?
Solr 5.2
Thanks
15 matches
Mail list logo
