?
- Muneeb
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Disk-usage-per-field-tp934765p1827739.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hey Robert,
Just wondering if you ever got to solve this problem?
We are facing a similar issue with our catalog search :(
look forward to hearing from you.
-Thanks,
Muneeb
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Searching-for-words-with-accented-characters
/DRAM storage... Is anyone using
SSDs for solr application?
What would be a better route to take? more memory or flash based SSD hard
drive?
Thanks,
-Muneeb
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/improving-search-response-time-tp1204491p1226372.html
Sent from the Solr
=161.46207100162033)
2.0 = boost
8.5721357E-4 = queryNorm
DisMaxQParser
−
−
sum(readerScore)^2 sum(yearScore)^1.1
−
5468.0
−
1.0
−
1.0
−
0.0
−
0.0
−
0.0
−
0.0
−
0.0
−
0.0
−
5467.0
−
4734.0
−
0.0
−
0.0
−
231.0
−
0.0
−
0.0
−
501.0
=
Thanks for your help.
-Muneeb
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/improving-search-response-time-tp1204491p1207596.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
, minimizing number of stored fields, apart from hardware
suggestions.
I would appreciate if anyone with similar background could shed some light
on upgrading hardware in our situation. Or if any other configuration tweak
that is not on the above list.
Thanks,
-Muneeb
--
View this message in
Where do these lines go in solr config?
5000
1
Thanks,
-Mueeb
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/slave-index-is-bigger-than-master-index-tp996329p1003903.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Well I do have disk limitations too, and thats why I think slave nodes died,
when replicating data from master node. (as it was just adding on top of
existing index files).
What do you mean here? Optimizing is too CPU expensive?
What I meant by avoid playing around with slave nodes is that doing
>> In solrconfig.xml, these two lines control that. Maybe they need to be
increased.
>> 5000
>> 1
Where do I add those in solrconfig? These lines doesn't seem to be present
in the example solrconfig file...
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/slave-i
Well I do have disk limitations too, and thats why I think slave nodes died,
when replicating data from master node. (as it was just adding on top of
existing index files).
:: What do you mean here? Optimizing is too CPU expensive?
What I meant by avoid playing around with slave nodes is that d
We have three dedicated servers for solr, two for slaves and one for master,
all with linux/debian packages installed.
I understand that replication does always copies over the index in an exact
form as in master index directory (or it is supposed to do that at least),
and if the master index wa
dex, which
somehow resulted in normal index size at slaves.
I still don't get what exactly happened there, and will be investigating
into this. If I do find anything interesting, will update on this mailing
list.
Thanks for all your input anyways,
-Muneeb
--
View this message in context:
I just checked my config file, and I do have exact same values for
deletionPolicy tag, as you attached in your email, so I dont really think it
could be this.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/slave-index-is-bigger-than-master-index-tp996329p996373.html
Sent fr
Yes I always run an optimize whenever I index on master. In fact I just ran
an optimize command an hour ago, but it didn't make any difference.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/slave-index-is-bigger-than-master-index-tp996329p996364.html
Sent from the Solr - Us
nodes is
much bigger (336GB) than the master node index (i.e. only 86GB).
I am guessing that its not removing previous indices at slave nodes when
replicating? Has anyone faced similar issues?
Any help would be highly appreciated.
Thanks very much.
-Muneeb
--
View this message in context:
http
Hi Blargy,
Nice to hear that I am not alone ;)
Well we have been using Hadoop for other data-intensive services, those that
can be done in parallel. We have multiple nodes, which are used by Hadoop
for all our MapReduce jobs. I personally don't have much experience with its
use and hence wouldn
Hi,
I have indexed almost 7 million articles on two separate cores, each with
their own conf/ and data/ folder, i.e. they have their individual index.
What I normally do is, use core0 for querying and core1 for any updates and
once updates are finished i copy the index of core1 to core0's data f
Hi,
I have added a few extra fields to my solr document, which I want to effect
the default scoring algorithm. Could anyone guide me on how to start
customizing the solr scoring algorithm?
My Scenario:
As an example: my each indexed article has a field 'readerCount' which holds
the number of pe
ting to be different and hence concluded that
delete index didn't work!!
-M
Yonik Seeley-2 wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 12:22 PM, muneeb wrote:
>> I have made some changes to my schema, including setting of omitNorms to
>> false for a few fields. I am using Solr1.4 w
hat's why, in your example, the lengthNorm for 3 and 4 is the same.
>
> -Jay
> http://www.lucidimagination.com
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 9:50 AM, muneeb wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> :
>> : Did you reindex after setting omitNorms to false? I'm not sur
:
: Did you reindex after setting omitNorms to false? I'm not sure whether or
: not it is needed, but it makes sense.
Yes i deleted the old index and reindexed it.
Just to add another fact, that the titlles length is less than 10. I am not
sure if solr has pre-set values for length normalizatio
Hi,
I have made some changes to my schema, including setting of omitNorms to
false for a few fields. I am using Solr1.4 with SolrJ client. I deleted my
index using the client:
solrserver.deleteByQuery("*:*");
solrserver.optimize();
But after reindexing and running the queries i don't see any di
Hi,
In my schema, the document title field has "omitNorms=false", which, if I am
not wrong, causes length of titles to be counted in the scoring.
But when I query with: "word1 word2 word3" I dont know why still the top two
documents title have these words and other words, where as the document
Hi,
I have built an index of several million documents with all primitive type
fields, either String, text or int. I have another multivalued field to
index now for each document which is a list of tags as a hashmap, so:
tags , where key is String and value is Int.
key is a given tag and value i
Figured it out !!
I actually created two folders in solr.home/data folder, each holding the
index for a given core. So for core0 and core1 i had indexes as:
solr.home/data/core0/index
solr.home/data/core1/index
Feeling a little stupid now, having figured out a simple issue :s
muneeb wrote
Hi Everyone,
I am new to Solr, and still trying to get my hands on it.
I have indexed over 6 million documents and currently have a single large
index. I update my index using SolrJ client due to the format I store my
documents (i.e. JSON blobs) in database.
I need to find a way to have multiple
Hi,
Is there a way to remove duplicate values from the multivalued fields? I am
using Solrj client with solr 1.4 version.
Thanks in advance,
-Ali
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Removing-duplicate-values-from-multivalued-fields-tp27714441p27714441.html
Sent from the So
Hey All,
I have gone through the tutorial and ran Solrj example code. It worked fine.
I want to now implement my own full text search engine for my documents. I
am not sure how should i start about doing this, since in example code I ran
start.jar and post.jar?
do I have to run start.jar even
27 matches
Mail list logo
