Thanks Chris ,
for my 2nd Query (~1 returns words with 2 editing distance), it may be the
issue.
still m looking for my last issue. hope jira helps to resolve that.
Chris Hostetter-3 wrote
> :
> : 2) although I set editing distance to 1 in my query (e.g. worde~1), solr
> : returns me resul
I am using Solr4.2 , I have few queries on new fuzzy implementation in
Solr4+
1) I come to know that Solr4+ accepts maximum editing distance to 2 (2
insertion, deletion, replacements). Is there any way , i can configure this
maximum editing distance limit ??
2) although I set editing distance t
e how , without removing hl.maxAnalyzedChars= -1
from search query.
Dmitry Kan-2 wrote
> You didn't say, what is exactly going weird..
>
>
> On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 2:19 PM, meghana <
> meghana.ravani@
> > wrote:
>
>> I am facing one weird issue
I am facing one weird issue while setting hl.maxAnalyzedChars to -1 to fetch
highlight for some random records, for other records its working fine.
Below is my solr query
http://localhost:8080/solr/core0/select?q=(text:"new year") AND
(id:2343287)&hl=on&hl.fl=text&hl.fragsize=500&hl.maxAnalyzedC
Please help me on this!!
meghana wrote
> To ensure the all records exist in single node, i queried on specific
> duration, so , for shards core and simple core query, results should be
> similar.
>
> as you suggested, i analyzed the debugQuery for one specific search
*
p11ConnectionHandler.process(Http11Protocol.java:671)
at
org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$Worker.run(JIoEndpoint.java:930)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
Please help me on this.
Thanks
Meghana
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-to-ge
e specific "problem" (symptom) is that you
> are
> seeing. I mean, maybe there is only 1 result on that node - how do you
> know
> otherwise?? Or maybe one node has more exact matches.
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> -Original Message-
> From: meghana
>
I have created 2 versions of Solr core in different servers. one is simple
core having all records in one core. And other is shards core, distributed
over 3 cores on server.
Simple core :
http://localhost:8080/sorl/core0/select?q=text:hoers~1
Distributed core :
http://192.168.1.91:8080/core0/se
re whether/how those
> patterns could be combined.
>
> Also, that doesn't allow the case of a single ".", "&", or "_" as a word -
> but you didn't specify how that case should be handled.
>
>
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
> -Original Mes
I have configured WordDelimiterFilterFactory for custom tokenizers for '&'
and '-' , and for few tokenizer (like . _ :) we need to split on boundries
only.
e.g.
test.com (should tokenized to test.com)
newyear. (should tokenized to newyear)
new_car (should tokenized to new_car)
..
..
Below is d
t; -Original Message-
> From: meghana
> Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 3:25 AM
> To:
> solr-user@.apache
> Subject: Re: fuzzy search issue with PatternTokenizer Factory
>
> Jack,
>
> the regex will split tokens by anything expect alphabets , numbers, '&
roup", the pattern specifies what delimiter
> sequence will "split" the rest of the input into tokens. I suspect you
> didn't mean this.
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> -Original Message-
> From: meghana
> Sent: Friday, April 19, 2013 9:01 AM
> To:
I m using Solr4.2 , I have changed my text field definition, to use the
Solr.PatternTokenizerFactory instead of Solr.StandardTokenizerFactory , and
changed my schema defination as below
after doing s
Jack Krupansky-2 wrote
> Hyphen indicates as character range (as in "a-z"), so if you want to
> include
> a hyphen as a character, escape it with a single backslash.
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> -Original Message-
> From: meghana
> Sent: Wednesday,
Hi,
I need my tokenizer factory , to split on everything expect numbers ,
letters , '&' , ':' and single quote character.
I use 'PatternTokenizerFactory' as below,
but, its spiting tokens by space only . not sure what I am doing wrong in
this.
can anybody help me on this??
Thanks
--
Vie
In solr , I have text as like below format.
1s: This is very nice day. 4s: Christmas is about to come 7s: and christmas
preparation is just on 12s: this is awesome!!
I want that words like '1s:' , '4s:' , anything like 'ns:' should not be
indexed and searchable, to do so I have added stop words
te space
> tokenizer and don't use the word delimiter filter.
>
> Or, you can sometimes add custom character mapping tables to some filters
> and indicate that your desired special characters should be mapped to type
> "ALPHA".
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
>
We need to make Solr Search like
"Success & Failure"
"Working 50%"
but Solr query parser eliminates all special characters from search.
my search query is as mentioned below
http://localhost:8080/solr/core/select?q=%22Success%20%26%20Failure%22&hl=on&hl.snippets=99&debugQuery=on
below is debug
We use Solr4.2 in our application. We need to return highlight on same field
2 times, with different fragsize. Solr allows to highlight on different
fields with different fragsize as mentioned below , but do not work with
same fields
http://localhost:8080/solr/select?q="my
search"&hl=on&hl.fl=con
I want to use Regexp Fragmenter in my solr highlighting feature to customize
my fragment.
As per requirement , we need to return 25 words before and after
highlighting term.
To do so , i have made below regular expression
((?:\w+\W*){25})\b(span class)\b((?:\W*\w+){25})
This regular expression
Hi Erickson,
Thanks for your valuable reply.
Actually we had tried with just storing one field and highlighting on that
field all the time , whether we search on it or not.
It sometimes occurs issue , like if i search with the term : 'hospitality' .
and I use field for highlighting , which havi
0 down vote favorite
We are using solr 3.6.
We have field named Description. We want searching feature with stemming and
also without stemming (exact word/phrase search), with highlighting in both
.
For that , we had made lot of research and come to conclusion, to use the
copy field wi
doesn't seem to be working. (Anonymous - via GTD
> book)
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 9:40 AM, meghana <meghana.ravani@> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have one date field in my data source as of format below
>>
>> 'Apr 10 2012 10:30AM'
&g
Hi,
I have one date field in my data source as of format below
'Apr 10 2012 10:30AM'
Now i wanted to add this field 2 times in my solr index, one with exact
value as of above and one with 'tdate' format of solr schema.
I used XPathEntityProcessor for my dataimport xml , and i add this date
fie
Hi Ravish , the defination for text_en_splitting in solr default schema and
of mine are same.. still its not working... any idea?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-case-insensitive-search-do-not-work-tp4002605p4002645.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailin
@Ravish Bhagdev , Yes I am adding double quotes around my search , as shown
in my post. Like,
myfield:"cloud university"
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-case-insensitive-search-do-not-work-tp4002605p4002610.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list
I want to apply case-insensitive search for field *myfield* in solr.
I googled a bit for that , and i found that , i need to apply
*LowerCaseFilterFactory *to Field Type and field should be of
solr.TextFeild.
I applied that in my *schema.xml* and re-index the data, then also my search
seems to be
I was looking on Regex fragment for customizing my highlight fragment, I was
wondering how Regex fragment works within solr and googled for it , But
didn't found any results.
Can anybody tell me how regex fragmenter works with in solr.
And when regex fragmenter apply regex on fragments , do i
0 down vote favorite
I want solr highlight in specific format.
Below is string format for which i need to provide highlighting feature
---
130s: LISTEN! LISTEN! 138s: [THUMP] 143s: WHAT IS THAT? 144s: HEAR THAT?
152s: EVERYBODY, SHH. SHH. 156s: STAY UP THERE.
Hi @iorixxx , I use DefaultSolrHighlighter , and yes fragment size also
includes tags but if we remove from fragment , then also the
average size of fragment is 110 instead of 100.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-hl-fragsize-Issue-tp3997457p3997656.ht
i am using solr 3.5 , and in search query i set hl.fragsize = 100 , but my
fragment does not contain exact 100 chars , average fragment size is 120 .
Can anybody have idea about this issue??
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-hl-fragsize-Issue-tp3
Hi Erik.. Thanks for your reply.
And yes data was on index. but i found the problem , the problem was not of
PlainTextEntityProcessor. highlighting was returning in multivalued field
and in non-multivalued field there was less highlight. so i thought problem
may be in PlainTextEntityProcessor.
B
t's a German cat?!
I won't rub this cat
Drop the cat or I rip
aslo for few documents , i get record but with 0 highlighting.
Do anybody have idea on this??
Thanks
Meghana
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Highlighting-issue-with-PlainTextEntityProcess
ScriptTransformer to make string
like above... but it encode some text , So i want it to make happen using
XPathEntityProcessor.
Can anybody have any idea , how to do that?
Thanks
Meghana
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/XPathEntityProcessor-append-text-in-foreach
Aslo i found that XPathEntityProcessor doesn't encode text.
but if i try to import data using XpathEnityProcessor it does not import
data for my Mfld field (non-multivalued).
below what i have tried.
String will be like
; in 'Mfld'?
Thanks
Meghana
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/XPathEntityProcessor-append-text-in-foreach-tp3635022p3635022.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
document than previously (multivalued -
xpathentity processor)
what should be the cause of this?
and how/what changes needed so that it works as previously?
Thanks
Meghana
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Search-issue-while-making-multivalued-field-to
ot
convert quotation mark to ")
Plz help me
Thanks
Meghana
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/prevent-PlainTextEntityProcessor-to-encode-text-tp3634744p3634744.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
Can i do like.. stemmed match should score a lower then non-stemmed (exact
word) match ?
Thanks
Meghana
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/disable-stemming-on-query-parser-tp3591420p3631826.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
any other way??
Thanks
Meghana
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/hl-boundaryScanner-and-hl-bs-chars-tp3615838p3616218.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
below
10
s:
do i missing anything , or doing anything wrong??
i like to make a note that i am using solr version 1.4
Thanks
Meghana
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/hl-boundaryScanner-and-hl-bs-chars-tp3615838p3615940
below
10
s:
do i missing anything , or doing anything wrong??
i like to make a note that i am using solr version 1.4
Thanks
Meghana
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Mutivalue-field-search-on-different-ele
i can specify and can set fragment length
dynamic (if possible) .
Can i do this by any way??
Meghana
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/hl-boundaryScanner-and-hl-bs-chars-tp3615838p3615838.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
i can't delete 1s ,2s ...etc from my field value , i have to keep text in
this format... so i'll apply slop in my search to do my needed search done.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Mutivalue-field-search-on-different-elements-tp3604213p3615816.html
Sent f
ch i always have to apply slop in my search.
Thanks for reply.
Meghana.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Mutivalue-field-search-on-different-elements-tp3604213p3614365.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
don't get my search : "christmas preparation" to be
matched on my search query , although i had set my positionIncrementGap to
0. any ideas why it is not matching ??
Please help me.
Meghana
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Mutivalue-
Thanks Matthew ,
Its really helped a lot. i am about to done with this.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/PlainTextEntityProcessor-and-RegexTransformer-in-DataImport-Handler-tp3608449p3612674.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
returning
me highlighting on that phrase. Is there any solution to that ?
Thanks
Meghana
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Mutivalue-field-search-on-different-elements-tp3604213p3608892.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
: Enjoy
if we can convert this as my desired result then it would be great.
Thanks in Adcance.
Meghana
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/PlainTextEntityProcessor-and-RegexTransformer-in-DataImport-Handler-tp3608449p3608726.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing
entity, but i need above format in
single valued field, for which i am failed to do it.
Can any body help me, how can i get my desired result? or what i am doing
wrong on above transformer?
Thanks
Meghana
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/PlainTextEntityProcessor
signle valued field, for which
i am failed to do it.
Can any body help me, how can i get my desired result? or what i am doing
wrong on above transformer?
Thanks
Meghana
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/PlainTexttransformer-and-RegexTransformer-in-DataImport
me
highlighting on that words of phrase. can i handle this by doing some
configuration changes?
Thanks
Meghana
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Mutivalue-field-search-on-different-elements-tp3604213p3606597.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list
with "christmas preparation" , then this should match. if
i set positionIncrementGap to 0 then do it will match? Or how value of
positionIncrementGap behave on my search?
Meghana
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Mutivalue-field-search-on-differen
ent).
do anybody have any idea?
Thanks
Meghana
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Mutivalue-field-search-on-different-elements-tp3604213p3604213.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ssion? i really need to do this.
Thanks
Meghana
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/disable-stemming-on-query-parser-tp3591420p3604188.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ssion? i really need to do this.
Thanks
Meghana
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/disable-stemming-on-query-parser-tp3591420p3604186.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
char)
Thanks in advance,
Meghana
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/disable-stemming-on-query-parser-tp3591420p3603675.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ke a
query parser in which stemming is disabled. please let me know if have any
idea on it or any other solution which can be applied.
Please please let me know .
Meghana
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/disable-stemming-on-query-parser-tp3591420p3597597.html
Sen
Hi All,
I am using Stemming in my solr , but i don't want to apply stemming always
for each search request. i am thinking of to disable stemming on one
specific query parser , can i do this?
Any help much appreciated.
Thanks in Advance
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.
any solutions?? i am just get stuck in this. :(
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/make-fuzzy-search-for-phrase-tp3542079p3551203.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
fs:///opt/jboss-6.0.0.Final/server/default/deploy/ComplexPhrase-1.0.jar
--
any idea why such error is coming...
Thanks
Meghana
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/make-fuzzy-search-for-phrase-tp3542079p3548238
va:877)
at
org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.process(Http11Protocol.java:654)
at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$Worker.run(JIoEndpoint.java:951)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:636)
anybody have any idea , how to solve this??
Thanks in Advance,
Meghana
--
View this
This seems to be solution of my problem.. i definitely try this.
Thanks for your reply.
Meghana.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/make-fuzzy-search-for-phrase-tp3542079p3544239.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
Can i apply fuzzy query and slop together... like
q="hello world~0.5"~3
I am getting error when applying like this. i want to make both fuzzy search
and slop work.
How can i do this, can anybody help me?
Thanks in Advance.
Meghana
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene
emansi~0.7 AND ken* : 22948 records.
i want to get amount of data that is good in accuracy and some what near to
my actual results. by applying more accuracy than if 0.7 , i am getting very
less data and none match with my desired result.
anybody have any idea?
any help much appreciated.
Meghana
nything how can i set it my solr fuzzy query.
Thanks in Advance.
Meghana
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/fuzzy-search-with-prefix-tp3542064p3542064.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
inside "of phrases").
>
> Erik
>
>
> On Nov 24, 2011, at 03:08 , meghana wrote:
>
>> okey, i am not very much aware of it , can i use lucene query parser with
>> solr and make this fuzzy search possible?
>>
>> Erik Hatcher-4 wrote
>>
is this for wildcard search and search for misspell words. i need the same
to do in my application.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/complex-phrase-plugin-install-tp3533123p3533182.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
that either the users or your application do this.
>
> Erik
>
> On Nov 23, 2011, at 09:03 , meghana wrote:
>
>> Hi Erik,
>>
>> Thanks for your reply. i come to know that Lucene provides the fuzzy
>> search by applying tilde("~") symbol at t
this seems to be good. if it is possible , i want to make it from solr
features / configuration changes. but can go for it, if it is not possible
or not much compatible.
Thanks.
iorixxx wrote
>
>> I have configured spellchecker component in my solr. it
>> works with custom
>> request handler (h
We are using solr query parser... just need some schema and / or solrconfig
configuration to do the misspell search and find results.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/need-a-way-so-that-solr-return-result-for-misspelled-terms-tp3530584p3532979.html
Sent from th
Hi Erik,
Thanks for your reply. i come to know that Lucene provides the fuzzy
search by applying tilde("~") symbol at the end of search with like
delll~0.8
can we apply such fuzzy logic in solr in any way?
Thanks
Meghana
Erik Hatcher-4 wrote
>
> Meghana -
>
> There
relative
spells of misspelled search term.
Can we do this.
Any help much appreciated.
Meghana
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/need-a-way-so-that-solr-return-result-for-misspelled-terms-tp3530584p3530584.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at
, CST ,MST , PST) (passing it in fq)
Category : (multiple choice) (passing it in fq)
Market : (multiple choice) (passing it in fq)
Affiliate Network : (multiple choice) (passing it in fq)
I really appreciate your view.
Meghana
Jeff Schmidt wrote
>
> Hi Erik:
>
> When using [e]
I have configured specllchecker component in my solrconfig
below is the configuration
false
false
1
spellcheck
using above configuration it works with below url
http://192.168.1.59:8080/solr/core0/spellcheck?q=sc:directry&spel
Hi all,
I need to find a way by which solr check and return for results for
misspelled search term.
Do anybody have any idea?
Thank You!!
Meghana
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Search-for-misspelled-search-term-tp3529961p3529961.html
Sent from the
Thanks Pravesh for your reply..
I definitely try this.. i hope it will improve solr response time.
pravesh wrote
>
> Usually,
>
> Use the 'q' parameter to search for the free text values entered by the
> users (where you might want to parse the query and/or apply
> boosting/phrase-sloppy, minim
77 matches
Mail list logo