Thanks Rajinimaski for the reposnse.
Agree that if the changes are frequent, then first option wouldn't work
efficiently. Also the other challenge is that in our case for each
resource, it is easy/efficient to get a list of changes since last
checkpoint (because of our model of deployment of cust
Thanks Otis
We also thought about having multiple fields, but thought that having too
many fields will be an issue. I see threads about too many fields is an
issue for sort (we don't expect to sort on these), but look through the
archives.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.4720
In our application, we index educational resources and allow searching for
them.
We allow our customers to change some of the non-textual metadata associated
with a resource (like booklevel, interestlevel etc) to serve their users
better.
So for each resource, in theory it could have different set
I had earlier posted a similar discussion in LinkedIn and David Smiley
rightly advised me that solr-user is a better place for technical
discussions
--
Our product which is hosted supports searching on educational resources. Our
customers can choose to make specifi
We want the effect of the field length to have a lesser influence on score
for the title field (we don't want to completely disable it) -- so we get
the following behavior
Docs with more hits in the title rank higher
Docs with shorter titles rank higher if the hits are equal.
The DefaultS