Thanks Otis. Will try out using a single index.
karthik c
http://cantspellathing.blogspot.com
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 11:24 PM, Otis Gospodnetic <
otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> You can really go either way. Empty fields are OK. Having lots of cores
> seems har
to fix the problem though.
My concerns about using a single core are:
1. The schema will now contain fields for all types. So most fields will be
empty in most documents.
2. Will searching within a type be slower when compared to having the type
in a separate core ?
Thanks,
kart
Thanks Erik... Can we enable highlighting for facet results as well ? I am
using Solr's faceting feature to get a unique set of results for the field
with counts, so unless highlighting works for facet results, it will not
really be useful.
karthik c
http://cantspellathing.blogspot.com
O
Thanks Otis... What kind of post-processing are u talking about here ? Is
there any mechanism in Solr to identify which of the facet results match the
query ?
karthik c
http://cantspellathing.blogspot.com
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 6:57 PM, Otis Gospodnetic <
otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com>
approach, I will have to pre-compute and index
the number of movies associated with each actor as well. I will need to do
this for the other fields as well. Do let me know if you any other
suggestions/approaches as well.
Thanks,
karthik c
http://cantspellathing.blogspot.com
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12
2
2
2
2
The other actors in the above results is obviously not what we expect to
see, since they do match the original query (i.e. malkovich).
Is there any other way I can approach this for multi-valued fields ?
Thanks,
karthik c
http://cantspellathing.blogspot.com
