Hi Emir,
i'm testing these on the examples that comes with solr (techproducts), i
just added some docs to that.
Both those queries give the expected results.
I'm testing on a TextField (indexed, tokenized, stored).
--
Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
That still does not work for me.
I'm not getting results for "Leonardo da vinci bla bla Leonardo" or
"Leonardo 1 da vinci bla bla Leonardo".
Tried on both solr 6.4.1 and solr 7.2.1
--
Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
I'm using solr 6.4.1, i will try your updated version and let you know,
thanks!
--
Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
Hi Timothy,
i'm trying to use your Parser, but i'm having some trouble with the versions
of solr\lucene.
I'm trying to use version 6.4.1 but i'm facing a lot of incompatibilities
with version 5. Is there any updated version of the plugin?
--
Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-U
I'm working on 6.4.1 (but i tried on 7.2.1 too) and i'm not getting results
for the case i've shown before.
--
Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
Hi Emir,
unfortunately that does not work, since i'm not getting a match for my third
example ("Leonardo is the name of Leonardo da Vinci") because i have both
"Leonardo" and "Leonardo da Vinci" in the same field. I'm fine with having
"Leonardo da Vinci" as long as i have another "Leonardo" (NOT f
That looks great!
Not sure how to install that into my version of Solr though (using 6.4.1)
--
Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
What i'm trying to do is to only get results for "Leonardo" when is not
followed by "da vinci".
So any result containing "Leonardo" (not followed by "da vinci") is fine
even if i have "Leonardo da vinci" in the result. I want to filter out only
the results where i don't have "Leonardo" without "da
Markus Jelsma-2 wrote
> You can abuse phrase query for that, q=leonardo AND -"leonardo da vinci"
> (asuming you have a proper default field set).
>
> Markus
This way i'm losing results where i have both "Leonardo" and "Leonardo da
vinci in the same field, see example number 3 "Leonardo foo bar Le
What i'm trying to do is to only get results for "Leonardo" when is not
followed by "da vinci".
If i have "Leonardo da vinci" in my result is fine as long as i have another
"Leonardo" without "da vinci".
Examples:
"Leonardo foo bar" OK
"Leonardo da vinci foo bar" KO
"Leonardo foo bar Leonardo da
Hi Susheel,
Thank you so much for so quick response! I've created the issue as you
requested, please refer to the link:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11369
Thank you!
Ivan
-Original Message-
From: Susheel Kumar [mailto:susheel2...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, Septemb
nging (and probably
impossible) to restrict users from accessing some particular paths with
security.json mechanism, and we think that that would be beneficial for overall
Solr security to hide Zookeeper credentials.
Thank you so much for your consideration!
Best regards,
Ivan Pekhov
Hi OTH,
I personally prefer to use the classic *schema.xml* file as I feel its
better for core creation with the desired fields than dealing with api
calls.
You can use it specifying the schemaFactory class as
ClassicIndexSchemaFactory as follows:
Best regards,
Ivan
2017-03-07 17:41 GMT+01
uery.*
Best regards,
--
Ivan
,
"content_type": 'A',
"_childDocuments_": [ { "id": "S_1", "content_type": "B", },
Best regards,
--
Ivan
le.weekday:2)" OR _query_:"has_new_filters:false"
Any thoughts on this kind of nested queries (_query_) performance?
Best regards,
Ivan
2017-01-19 18:40 GMT+01:00 Mikhail Khludnev :
> It's my pet peeve. Try
> ?q={!parent which=content_type:activity}(schedule.weekday:1) OR
> h
edules:false, on the contrary I only get the first
condition. Also, if I use the "(" it gives me a syntax error.
The other issue here, is that if I remove the " chars, Solr gets the second
condition (has_schedules:false) as part of the nested child query, which
implies an error as this is a parent's field.
Thank you for any help,
--
Ivan
o why this is happening in Solr 5.5.2?
Our configuration:
1. mlt.maxqt=1002. There is an additional filter passed as a parameter3. 4. text_en is a pretty standard text
fieldType.
Thanks,
Ivan
On Monday, October 31, 2016 5:10 PM, Ivan Provalov
wrote:
I noticed a 3X performance degra
I noticed a 3X performance degradation for MoreLikeThis between 4.6.1 and
5.5.2. Our configuration:
where text_en is a pretty standard text fieldType.
Any pointers?
Thanks,
Ivan Provalov
Hello,
I'm testing block join in solr 4.6.1 and wondering, is it possible to
get facets for fields in subdocuments with number of hits based on ROOT
documents?
See example below:
ROOT
testing 123
title
GRP
khat
7000
purchase
can
For example we know that cache warming is executed during startup.
Are any other processes executed during Solr startup?
Thank you, Ivan
l and tiny cores could be a
pain'? Could you please provide more details.
Thank you for your help, Ivan
-Original Message-
From: Jack Krupansky [mailto:j...@basetechnology.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2012 3:17 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr Single Core vs Mult
disabled? This option is
really important for us.
3. What processes are executed during Solr startup?
Thank you in advance, Ivan
tch documents that contain value 'foo' in metadata with field
key: 100? (that is only doc1 should be returned)
2. Should I post issue to JIRA about large index size, or it's expected
behaviour in our case?
Thanks, Ivan
From: yse
To create a core please take a look at
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.CoreAdminRequest.
To index documents try:
SolrServer#add(Collection);
SolrServer#commit();
On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 16:39 +0200, dhaivat wrote:
> Thanks Ivan,
>
> Is there any specific method using which i c
You should create HttpSolrServer that works with a core. One
CommonsHttpSolrServer per core.
java snippet: final CommonsHttpSolrServer solrServer = new
CommonsHttpSolrServer("http://localhost:8080/solr"; + "/myCoreName");
The rest remains unchanged.
Thanks, Ivan
On Thu,
configuration can be applied to reduce size of
index.
Thank you in advance, Ivan
Next IR Meetup will be held at Farmington Hills Community Library on August 17,
2011. Please RSVP here:
http://www.meetup.com/Michigan-Information-Retrieval-Enthusiasts-Group
Thank you,
Ivan Provalov
09. Using different features (words, part
of speech, negations, etc...) SVM classifier is trained and evaluated.
Thank you,
Ivan Provalov
al-in:
866-394-9514
6087393
Remote Web-Conferencing:
http://www.conferenceplus.com/
866-394-9514
6087393
Location:
uRefer, 924 N. Main St., Suite 3, Ann Arbor, MI
Thank you,
Ivan Provalov
Information Architect
Cengage Learning
Hello,
I am using both Solr server and Solr embedded versions in the same context.
I am using the Solr Server for indexing data which can be accessed at
enterprise level, and the embedded version in a desktop application.
The idea is that both index the same data, have the same schema.xml and
31 matches
Mail list logo