'http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/security/?p=4501&tag=nl.e036'
EARTH has a Right To Life,
otherwise we all die.
- Original Message
From: gwk
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Wed, November 17, 2010 2:12:16 AM
Subject: Re: DateFormatTransformer issue with value -00-
tring option, i.e.
mysql://user:passw...@mysqlhost/database?zeroDateTimeBehavior=convertToNull
This will make the mysql driver return those values as NULL instead of
all-zero dates.
Regards,
gwk
is available, but as Solr
is just the search backend the frontend stuff you'll have to write yourself.
Regards,
gwk
://www.mysecondhome.co.uk/search.html) to create
the nice sliders Geert-Jan describes. We've also used it to add the
sparklines above the sliders which give a nice indication of how the
current selection is spread out.
Regards,
gwk
On 11/9/2010 3:33 PM, Geert-Jan Brits wrote:
Just to a
r the head for that).
If you want more information I'd be happy to help.
Regards,
gwk
On 9/14/2010 8:14 PM, Charlie DeTar wrote:
Hi,
I'm interested in using geographic clustering of records in a Solr
search index. Specifically, I want to be able to efficiently produce a
map with cl
name_^4 name^4 names (Where is the currently selected
language on the website)
- pf=name_^4 name^4 names parents
Honestly, those parameters are basically just tweaked without quite
understanding their meaning until I got something that worked
adequately. Hope this helps.
Regards,
gwk
.co.uk), our solution is
quite similar to the one proposed by Markus however we use a separate
core for the auto-completion data which is updated hourly, this is due
to the fact you can complete on multiple levels of geography which would
be quite hard to do with faceting.
Regards,
gwk
llowing and see if it behaves
correctly:
id:1234 AND (*:* AND -indexid:1 AND -indexid:2) AND -indexid:3
Regards,
gwk
On 5/31/2010 4:24 PM, gwk wrote:
On 5/31/2010 11:50 AM, gwk wrote:
On 5/31/2010 11:29 AM, Geert-Jan Brits wrote:
May I ask how you implemented getting the facet counts for each
interval? Do
you use a facet-query per interval?
And perhaps for inspiration a link to the site you implemented this
On 5/31/2010 11:50 AM, gwk wrote:
On 5/31/2010 11:29 AM, Geert-Jan Brits wrote:
May I ask how you implemented getting the facet counts for each
interval? Do
you use a facet-query per interval?
And perhaps for inspiration a link to the site you implemented this ..
Thanks,
Geert-Jan
I love the
d mix []
and {} but unfortunately I'm not familiar enough with it to get it to work.
Regards,
gwk
is useful to you, I'll be happy to answer any questions about how I
implemented this.
Regards,
gwk
On 5/16/2010 10:07 PM, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
On 16.05.2010, at 21:01, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/StatsComponent can give you
min and max values.
Sorry my bad,
Hi,
Several possible solutions are discussed in
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Date-Faceting-and-Double-Counting-td502014.html
Regards,
gwk
On 4/27/2010 10:02 PM, Király Péter wrote:
Dear Solr users,
I am interesting, whether it is possible to get date facets without
intersecting
Oops, the new patch only works on Trie fields, other stuff I said should
still be valid. (One extra thing to be aware of is double counting, see
http://n3.nabble.com/Date-Faceting-and-Double-Counting-td502014.html for
example)
Regards,
gwk
On 4/7/2010 4:03 PM, gwk wrote:
Hi,
A while back
ld work on most numerical field types.
Regards,
gwk
On 4/7/2010 2:44 AM, Blargy wrote:
What would be the best way to do range bucketing on a price field?
I'm sort of taking the example from the Solr 1.4 book and I was thinking
about using a PatternTokenizerFactory with a SynonymFilter
seful for faceting.
Regards,
gwk
On 3/29/2010 6:07 PM, Dhanushka Samarakoon wrote:
Thanks for the reply. I was just giving the above as an example.
Something as simple as following is also not working.
/select/?q=france+fDepartmentName:History&version=2.2&
So it looks like the query par
section in
the wiki page).
Regards,
gwk
On 3/24/2010 5:31 PM, Steve Dupree wrote:
*Solr 1.4 Enterprise Search Server* recommends doing large updates on a copy
of the core, and then swapping it in for the main core. I tried following
these steps:
1. Create prep core:
http://localhost
Hi,
Try replacing KeywordTokenizerFactory with a WhitespaceTokenizerFactory
so it'll create separate terms per word. After a reindex it should work.
Regards,
gwk
On 3/11/2010 4:33 PM, stocki wrote:
hey,
okay i show your my settings ;)
i use an extra core with the standard requestha
Hi,
I'm no expert on the full-text search features of Solr but I guess that
has something to do with your fieldtype, or query. Are you using the
standard request handler or dismax for your queries? And what analysers
are you using on your product name field?
Regards,
gwk
On 3/11/2010
separate server and replicated so the indexing has no impact on the
performance of the site).
Regards,
gwk
On 3/10/2010 3:09 PM, stocki wrote:
okay. thx
my suggestion run in another core;)
do you distinct during the import with DIH ?
hough I haven't tested it so I could be
horribly horribly wrong).
Regards,
gwk
On 3/10/2010 2:55 PM, stocki wrote:
hello.
i implement my suggest-function with edgengramfilter.
now when i get my result , is the result not distinct. often ist the name
double or more.
is it possible tha
Hi Liam,
This happens because the range searches for date faceting are inclusive
on both ends. So values on the exact edges of the intervals are counted
twice. You can see some solutions at
http://old.nabble.com/Date-Faceting-and-Double-Counting-td25227846.html
Regards,
gwk
On 2/24/2010 6
Have a look at the q.alt parameter
(http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DisMaxRequestHandler#q.alt) which is used
for exactly this issue. Basically putting q.alt=*:* in your query means
you can leave out the q parameter if you want all documents to be selected.
Regards,
gwk
On 2/19/2010 11:28 AM
The "trick" I use is to use LocalParams to give eacht facet query a well
defined name. Afterwards you can loop through the names in whatever
order you want.
so basically facet.query={!key=price_0}[* TO 100] etc.
N.B. the facet queries in your example will lead to some documents to be
counted double (i.e. when the price is exactly 100, 200, 300).
Regards,
gwk
There's a ! missing in there, try {!key=label}.
Regards,
gwk
On 2/18/2010 5:01 AM, adeelmahmood wrote:
okay so if I dont want to do any excludes then I am assuming I should just
put in {key=label}field .. i tried that and it doesnt work .. it says
undefined field {key=label}field
s
that wouldn't work for the diacritical marks without a lot of
transliteration brouhaha.
Regards,
gwk
"1"
catenateAll="0" splitOnCaseChange="1"/>
maxGramSize="20"/>
ignoreCase="true" expand="true"/>
words="stopwords.txt"/>
generateNumberParts="1" catenateWords="0" catenateNumbers="0"
catenateAll="0" splitOnCaseChange="1"/>
Regards,
gwk
t [row,col {unknown-source}]: [49,23]
é is an entity defined for (X)HTML. XML only uses " &
' < > and &#; So if you want to use the é character you'll
have to either use the character itself or something like É
Regards,
gwk
dered
on it on the server to improve performance (GTileLayerOverlay) Does
anyone have any experience using geoserver, mapserver or a similar
application in combination with Solr so that the application can
generate tiles from a Solr query and tile position/zoom level?
Regards,
gwk
at the same time the
index script is run where it only retrieved one of the updates, this
will cause some documents to be updates multiple times but as document
updates are idempotent this is no real problem.)
Regards,
gwk
achieve the effect of filterqueries
(including the awesome caching) by manipulating either the rangeQ or
docs. And since the snippet above is called multiple times with
different rangeQ but the same (filtered) DocSet I guess manipulating
docs would be faster (I think).
Regards,
gwk
gwk wrote:
Hi Elaine,
You can page your resultset with the rows and start parameters
(http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CommonQueryParameters). So for example to
get the first 100 results one would use the parameters rows=100&start=0
and the second 100 results with rows=100&start=100 etc. etc.
Regar
u might've
meant that you only want to retrieve certain fields from each document.
For that you can use the fl parameter
(http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CommonQueryParameters#head-db2785986af2355759faaaca53dc8fd0b012d1ab).
Hope this helps.
Regards,
gwk
Elaine Li wrote:
I want to get the 1
finer than the requested precision
and use a weighted average of the four parts of the cluster, I'll have
to see if that is accurate enough.
Hopefully I'll have the time to complete this today or tomorrow. I'll
report back if it has worked.
Regards,
gwk
Joe Calderon wro
r curve mapping in Solr and clustering using facet
counts on numerical ranges of that mapping but I'm not sure it will pan out.
Regards,
gwk
Grant Ingersoll wrote:
Not directly related to geo clustering, but
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-769 is all about a pluggable
int
Hi Gareth,
Try removing the space between de closing bracket } and the field name,
I think that should work.
Regards,
gwk
gareth rushgrove wrote:
Hi All
Hoping someone might be able to help me with a problem.
I downloaded and got up and running with the latest nightly release of Solr
ty depending on zoom level by adding latitude on
longitude fields for each zoom level (so that for smaller countries you
have to be zoomed in further to get the next level of clustering).
I was wondering if anybody else has worked on something similar and if
so what their solutions are.
Regards,
gwk
Hello Rajan,
I might be mistaken, but isn't CouchDB or a similar map/reduce database
ideal for situations like this?
Regards,
gwk
rajan chandi wrote:
Hi All,
We are dealing with a very complex problem of person specific search.
We're building a social network where people will
try not to store textual descriptions
but every facet a property can have. This gives us exactly the data
needed to perform faceting but not so much on the full text search
(which is used mind you, to find suggestions when you use the search box).
Regards,
gwk
number faceting where you can specify if
: either end of each range should be inclusive or exclusive. I just ported it
gwk:
1) would you mind opening a Jira issue for your date faceting improvements
as well (email attachments tend to get lost, and there are legal headaches
with committing them
, end, both and neither
To maintain compatibility with solr without the patch the default is
neither. I hope the meaning of the values are self-explanatory.
Regards,
gwk
Stephen Duncan Jr wrote:
If we do date faceting and start at 2009-01-01T00:00:00Z, end at
2009-01-03T00:00:00Z, with a gap of
Dave Searle wrote:
Hi Gwk,
It's a nice clean site, easy to use and seems very fast, well done! How well
does it do in regards to SEO though? I noticed there's a lot of ajax going on
in the background to help speed things up for the user (love the sliders), but
seems to be lacking
o Solr-seems-to-know-a-little-bit. We're running a nightly build of
Solr 1.4 with SOLR-1240 applied for the dynamic facet count updates when
using the sliders in the search screen.
Again, thank you and if you have any suggestions or questions regarding
our implementation, feel free to ask.
Regards,
gwk
Hi,
Thanks for your response, I'm still developing so the schema is still in
flux so I guess that explains it. Oh and regarding the NPE, I updated my
checkout and recompiled and now it's gone so I guess somewhere between
revision 787997 and 798482 it's already been fixed.
have misunderstood the purpose of optimize but
that shouldn't have any effect on scoring should it?
For what it's worth, I'm using dismax with the functionquery in bf.
Regards,
gwk
Oops, it seems it's due to a fq in the same query, not because of
the, there's a range q
at org.apache.solr.search.QueryParsing.toString(QueryParsing.java:360)
at org.apache.solr.search.QueryParsing.toString(QueryParsing.java:401)
at org.apache.solr.search.QueryParsing.toString(QueryParsing.java:466)
... 23 more
-Grant
On Jul 27, 2009, at 10:59 AM, gwk wrote:
gwk wrote:
Hi,
gwk wrote:
Hi,
I'm playing around with sorting via functionqueries, and I've set
_val_ to the following:
sum(product(always_on_top,5),recip(rord(publication_date),1,1000,1000))
Where the field always_on_top is a simple boolean field, where
documents with always_on_top:true should
t the document in
question had no publication_date field set (which is totally my fault)
however it took quite a while to discover this since I couldn't turn on
debugQuery. Is this a bug or expected behviour?
Regards,
gwk
lin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 7:56 PM, gwk wrote:
Is there a good way to select the top X facets and include some terms you
want to include as well something like
facet.field=country&f.country.facet.limit=X&f.country.facet.includeterms=Narnia,Guilder
or is ther
Hi,
I'm in the process of making a javascriptless web interface to Solr (the
nice ajax-version will be built on top of it unobtrusively). Our
database has a lot of fields and so I've grouped those with similar
characteristics to make several different 'widgets' (like a numerical
type which ge
Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 4:55 PM, gwk wrote:
I was wondering if someone is interested in a patch file and if so, where
should I post it?
This seems useful. Please open an issue and submit a patch. I'm sure there
will be interest.
Hi,
I clean
gwk wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently using facet.query to do my numerical range faceting. I
basically use a fixed price range of €0 to €1 in steps of €500
which means 20 facet.queries plus an extra facet.query for anything
above €1. I use the inclusive/exclusive query as per my question
erlooking something.
Regards,
gwk
Yes, this works perfectly, guess the "Never use equality comparison for
floating point numbers"-rule was so strong in my mind I didn't even
think to consider this possibility.
Thanks,
gwk
Avlesh Singh wrote:
Really sorry, this is what I meant: x:{5 TO 8} OR x:5
Cheers
Avle
Hi,
When doing range queries it seems the query is either x:[5 TO 8] which
means 5 <= x <= 8 or x:{5 TO 8} which means 5 < x < 8. But how do you
get one half exclusive, the other inclusive for double fields the
following: 5 <= x < 8? Is this possible?
Regards,
gwk
_title}book_title
Of course, this uses an 1.4 feature (tagging and excluding)
Regards,
gwk
Jeffrey Tiong wrote:
Hi,
I have a schema that has the following fields,
publisher_name
book_title
year
abstract
Currently if I do a facet count when I have a query "q=abstract:philosophy
AND publisher_
Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
Yes, that's the standard trick. :)
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
From: gwk
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 5:18:47 AM
Subject: Re: Distributed Search
Koji Sekiguchi wrote:
gwk wrote:
Hello,
The wiki states 'When duplicate doc IDs are received, Solr chooses
the first doc and discards subsequent ones', I was wondering whether
"the first doc" is the doc of the shard which responds first or the
doc in the first sha
Hello,
The wiki states 'When duplicate doc IDs are received, Solr chooses the
first doc and discards subsequent ones', I was wondering whether "the
first doc" is the doc of the shard which responds first or the doc in
the first shard in the shards GET parameter?
Regards,
gwk
ordinary query response's numFound attribute so you can
determine how many pages there should be. Is it possible to request this
information somehow in the same response and if possible how much does
it impact performance?
Regards,
gwk
Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 3:48 PM, gwk wrote:
1. Posting UTF-8 data through the example post-script works and I get
the proper results back when I query using the admin page.
However, data imported through the DataImportHandler from a MySQL
database
ribute to
your datasource, it fixed the problem for me.
Regards,
gwk
ute which acually represents that data, which comes from the
RegexTransformer I understand but why then is the "column"
attribute used instead of the "name"-attribute. This has confused
me somewhat, any clarification would be greatly appreciated.
Regards,
gwk
pContext-scope, solr logs:
org.apache.solr.core.SolrResourceLoader locateInstanceDir
INFO: No /solr/home in JNDI
org.apache.solr.core.SolrResourceLoader locateInstanceDir
INFO: solr home defaulted to 'solr/' (could not find system property or
JNDI)
Am I doing something wrong here? Any help will be appreciated.
Regards,
gwk
64 matches
Mail list logo
