I have a requirement where I have to search a product catalog and filter on a
substring. I am
not sure if this is supported. Any help is appreciated. I have included the
use case below.
Example:
Root cat -> Digital -> Watch -> "Timex Essentials"
Root cat -> Men -> Accessories -> "Timex Essent
I have a requirement where I have to search a product catalog and filter on a
substring. I am
not sure if this is supported. Any help is appreciated. I have included the
use case below.
Example:
Root cat -> Digital -> Watch -> "Timex Essentials"
Root cat -> Men -> Accessories -> "Timex Essentials
Is it possible to use Windows 1252 encoding instead of UTF-8 for Solr ? The
application runs
on Linux/JDK 1.5. We are using PHP for the front end. The problem we are
having is that some
characters are displayed weirdly owing to the encoding.
Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.n
Hoss,
This is not entirely related to the previous question. I know that the
Analyzer configuration
is causing the interpretation to be the way it is. In certain cases, where
the typed in field might
have user name such as "kathy_k", we want it to look for the exact
expression in addition to
wh
Is is possible to specify that a term to be looked up in alternate ways" -
e.g.
search = "3 D" OR "3D" ? Reason being, by default, a search for "3D" is
being split
into "3 D".
Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/OR-condition-in-search...-tf3695012.html#a10332814
Sent
(1) How does one ensure that Solr treats words like .Net and 3D correctly ?
Right now, they get
translated into Net and 3 d respectively.
(2) Is it possible to force Lucene to treat a multiword (e.g. Ruby on Rails)
as one word ? I am not sure
if there is a mechanism to do this by creating a speci
I want to capture information about the user who is executing a particular
search. Is there a way to specify in Solr that certain fields should just be
treated as pass through and not processed ? This way I can use arbitrary
params to do better logging.
Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
Thanks Ryan. I need to use query since I am deleting a range of documents.
>From your
comment, I wasn't sure if one doesn't need to do an explicit commit when
using delete by query.
Does delete by query not need an explicit commit.
Thanks.
ryan mckinley wrote:
>
> esch
I am trying to execute a faceted count on a field called "load_id" and want
to exclude 0s. The URL below
doesn't seem to be excluding zeros.
http://localhost:12002/solr/select/?qt=dismax&q=Y&qf=show_all_flag&fl=load_id&facet=true&facet.limit=-1&facet.field=load_id&facet.mincount=1&rows=0
Result
I am trying to remove documents from my index using "delete by query".
However when I did this, the deleted
items seem to remain. This is the format of the XML file I am using -
load_id:20070424150841
load_id:20070425145301
load_id:20070426145301
load_id:20070427145302
load_id:20070428145301
load
I am trying to search across multiple fields using the AND operator. Somehow,
when the results
are returned, the score seems to be retrieving the max value and not really
adding them up. In
the example given below, the value that is returned (825) is really the max
instead of what
I was expecting
Thanks Mike. I just tested it on one field and looks like it works fine.
Mike Klaas wrote:
>
> On 4/19/07, escher2k <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Jennifer. But the issue with the quotes would be that it would
>> match
>> the string exactly and
Thanks Chris. We are using dismax already :)
Chris Hostetter wrote:
>
>
> : not find it, if there were other words in between (e.g. New Capital
> Delhi).
>
> then you should use field:"New Delhi"~3 or (+field:New +field:Delhi) what
> you have now is going to match any docs that have "New" in
Thanks Jennifer. But the issue with the quotes would be that it would match
the string exactly and
not find it, if there were other words in between (e.g. New Capital Delhi).
Jennifer Seaman wrote:
>
>
>>Is there a way to only retrieve those records that contain both the
>>words "New" and "De
I have a bunch of fields that I am trying to filter on.
When I try to filter the data across the multiple fields, the result seems
to even retrieve fields where the data is not present.
For instance if the filter query contains this -
primary_state:New Delhi OR primary_country:New Delhi OR prima
This is related to an earlier posting
(http://www.nabble.com/Document-boost-not-as-expected...-tf3476653.html).
I am trying to determine a ranking for users that is between 1 and 1.5.
Because of the way the encoding
norm is stored, if index time boosting is done, everyone gets a score of 1,
1.25 o
31072 121359
Doc 2 123194.06 114688 106189
The difference between the results is because I am ignoring the length Norm
(changed it
from ((float)(1.0 / Math.sqrt(numTerms) to 1.0f). Thanks once again.
Mike Klaas wrote:
>
> On 3/28/07, escher2k <[E
Mike,
I am not doing anything custom for this test. I am assuming that the
Default Similarity is used.
Surprisingly, if I remove the document level boost (set to 1.0) and just
have a field level boost, the result
seems to be correct.
Mike Klaas wrote:
>
> On 3/28/07, escher2k &
Chris,
Earlier I was trying to modify the Similarity computation to make it
field dependent (we are trying to change tf based on the field). Now, I have
reverted the custom computation so that the default Similarity is used. Fro
testing, I boosted a single field in one doc.
Y
...
This is w
I am implementing a document boost at indexing time for the documents. I read
some posting that
seemed to indicate that omitNorm=false is needed to retain the document
boosting for retrieval.
After I did that, it looks like I am not able to get back the boost I
originally put in. Instead,
I get 1.
.
>
> You can find some documentation about it in the example schema.xml:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lucene/solr/trunk/example/solr/conf/schema.xml
>
> mirko
>
>
> Quoting escher2k <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>>
>> I have a strange problem, and I don't seem
I have a strange problem, and I don't seem to see any issue with the data. I
am filtering
on a field called reviews_positive_6_mos. The field is declared as an
integer.
If I specify -
(a) fq=reviews_positive_6mos%3A[*+TO+*] => 36033 records are retrieved.
(b) fq=reviews_positive_6mos%3A[*+TO+100]
Graham Stead-2 wrote:
>
> We have used replication for a few weeks now and it generally works well.
>
> I believe you'll find that commit operations cause only new segments to be
> transferred, whereas optimize operations cause the entire index to be
> transferred. Therefore, the amount of data
I was wondering if the scripts provided in Solr do incremental replication.
Looking at the script for snapshooter, it seems like the whole index
directory is copied over. Is that correct ? If so, isn't performance a
problem over the long run ? Thanks for the clarification in advance (I hope
I am w
Hi,
Thanks to the excellent support from the community and the application,
we have made good progress towards building a solution using Solr. We
currently use Lucene with Jakarta.
I was wondering if anyone has recommendations on using Jetty vs.
Jakarta. This will run on Solaris.
Thanks.
-
Hi,
I have a question about the syntax for doing an OR filter in my URL. How
do I specify
where ((fq=colA[10 TO 20]) AND (fq=state:USA OR fq=country:USA) ? Basically,
I am
doing a search for a keyword across certain fields and I want to filter the
result set.
The user can input city/state/count
I have a requirement wherein the documents that are retrieved based on the
similarity computation
are bucketed and resorted based on user score.
An example -
Let us say a search returns the following data set -
Doc ID Lucene score User score
10001000 125
1000 900
Thanks Chris. DUMB of me not to have noticed.
Chris Hostetter wrote:
>
>
> : : omitNorms="true"/>
> :
>
> your "fhild_catname" isn't using "string" as it's field type -- it's using
> "text" (which is most likely using TextField and being tokenized)
>
>
>
>
>
> -Hoss
>
>
>
--
View
I have a document which contains the following facet -
Other - Programming
When I get back the results, the output seems to show
lst name="facet_fields">
1
1
Is there any way to prevent "other" and "programming" from being returned as
tokens ?
The schema.xml defined this as a string
Is the latest Lucene nightly build compatible with the Solr ? If not, is
there any file in the download,
which lists the lucene build that is bundled with Solr ?
Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Lucene-Solr-version-question...-tf2927137.html#a8183274
Sent from the
Yonik,
I have my own Similarity and now need to write my own Scorer for muti
field scoring.
Is extending DisMaxQueryScorer the way to go ?
Thanks.
Yonik Seeley wrote:
>
> On 1/3/07, escher2k <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>I only saw options to specify the default operat
Hi,
I am trying to create a linear function to influence the similarity
computation. For example -
if tf = 4, f(tf) = 150 * 1 + 150 * 0.3
= 195
The first occurrence is multiplied by 150. The next three occurrences are
mulitplied by 150 and
divided by 10 (3/10).
Howev
I haven't written any unfortunately. Right now, I have only implemented
custom Similarity - in here, I am trying to alter the scoring substantially
depending on the field. However, I might need to alter the overall
document score - I am in the process of investigating if I can get away
without ha
What is the syntax to use to specify a search across multiple across fields
in a URL ?
This is in case someone needs to alter the "searchable" fields dynamically
as opposed to
reading them at server startup from "qf" in solrconfig.xml. Also, it is
easier at debug time :)
Thanks.
--
View this m
Chris Hostetter wrote:
>
>
> : The DisjunctionMaxQuery seems to yield the maximum score only. From my
>
> NOTE: by setting the "tiebreaker" value of a DisjunctionMaxQuery to "1.0"
> it generates the sum of the scores
>
> : understanding, I would
> : need to do the following -
> : (1) Create a
Yonik,
I only saw options to specify the default operator (AND|OR) and to
specify similarity. There was nothing for scoring - in case I need to modify
the
scoring. I got the similarity working by creating my own class.
Thanks.
Yonik Seeley wrote:
>
> On 1/2/07, escher2k <[EMAIL
Is there a way to specify a custom scorer in Solr using the XML configuration
file ? I want to
use the AND operator (e.g. "Lucene AND Solr") to search multiple fields and
then add the
similarity score for each field using a custom similiarity computation for
each.
Thanks.
--
View this message in
We have a requirement that requires an additive score and I am not sure if it
is possible
and what the right way to go about it is. Assume, there are three fields -
(a) Project name - contains text
(b) Project description - contains text
(c) Profile score - numeric
The basic idea is to implement
I had a question about the way boosting works - is it a final boost on the
score that is returned ?
For instance, in the LinearFloatFunction (LinearFloatFunction(ValueSource
source, float slope, float intercept)),
is the ValueSource is the "core" score returned by Lucene that gets boosted.
From
Thanks Chris. So, assuming that we rebuild the index, delete the old data and
then execute a commit,
will the snap scripts take care of reconciling all the data ? Internally, is
there an update timestamp notion
used to figure out which unique id records have changed and then synchronize
them by ex
Hi,
I have three documents in my test data set.
-
30ABCDE XYZ GHI
-
40abcde XYZ GHI
-
50abcde XYZ
I used the standard handler to retrieve the documents where "ghi" or "xyz"
are present (http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?q=ghi+xyz&debugQuery=1).
When the results are return
seperate context path. for example, you
> could have:
>
> http://xyz:8765/index1/select/?q=xxx
> http://xyz:8765/index2/select/?q=xxx
> http://xyz:8765/index3/select/?q=xxx
>
>
>
>
> On 12/21/06, escher2k <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>&
.
Erik Hatcher wrote:
>
> What is the advantage to running multiple indexes from a single Solr
> instance over multiple Solr instances each serving a single index?
>
> Erik
>
>
> On Dec 21, 2006, at 3:26 PM, escher2k wrote:
>
>>
>> I looked
on the same machine while the application is
still running ?
Ideally, what we would want is to recreate a new index from scratch and then
use the master/slave
configuration to copy the indexes to other machines.
Yonik Seeley wrote:
>
> On 12/21/06, escher2k <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I looked at the forums and found that it is not possible to have multiple
indexes associated with one app server instance ? Is the best way to run
multiple app server instances ? It would be a nice enhancement to support
parameterization of the index to be used.
--
View this message in context:
Hi,
We currently use Lucene to do index user data every couple of hours - the
index is completely rebuilt,
the old index is archived and the new one copied over to the directory.
Example -
/bin/cp ${LOG_FILE} ${CRON_ROOT}/index/help/
/bin/rm -rf ${INDEX_ROOT}/archive/help.${DATE}
/bin/cp -R ${C
46 matches
Mail list logo
