that was it... thanks. obviously the document is well over 2 mgs.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/solr-3-1-not-indexing-entire-document-tp3236719p3236773.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
hi, i have my solr field text configured as per earlier discussion:
and for debugging purposes i am storing the text field as well, so:
now when i do a search again
I have decided to use solr for indexing as well.
the types of searches im doing are professional/academic.
so for example, i need to match:
all over the following exactly from my source data:
"3.56",
"4 harv. l. rev. 45",
"187-532",
"3 llm 56",
"5 unts 8",
"6 u.n.t.s.
Hello,
I am trying to get lucene and solr to agree on a completely Raw indexing
method. I use lucene in my indexers that write to an index on disk, and
solr to search those indexes that i create, as creating the indexes without
solr is much much faster than using the solr server.
are there settin
i guess what im asking is how to set up solr/lucene to find
yale l.j.
yale l. j.
yale l j
as all the same thing.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/upgraded-from-2-9-to-3-x-problems-help-tp3129348p3129520.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nab
i recently upgraded al systems for indexing and searching to lucene/solr 3.1,
and unfortunatly it seems theres a lot more changes under the hood than
there used to be.
i have a java based indexer and a solr based searcher, on the java end for
the indexing this is what i have:
Set nostopwords =
