The corresponding docker image has been released as well:
https://hub.docker.com/_/solr
(credit to Tobias Kässmann for helping)
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 10:39 AM Timothy Potter
wrote:
> The Lucene PMC
One doubt about it:
In order to have a highly available zookeeper, you must have at least
three separate physical servers for ZK. Running multiple zookeepers on
one physical machine gains you nothing ... because if the whole machine
fails, you lose all of those zookeepers. If you have three phys
nd that ends
up being LazyField if you have that feature enabled, or possible wasted
space if you don't have that enabled. So I don't think the ability to
exclude fields in "fl" would obsolete enableLazyFieldLoading which I think
you are implying?
~ David Smiley
Apach
Congratulations Jan!
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 1:56 PM Anshum Gupta wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I’d like to inform everyone that the newly formed Apache Solr PMC nominated
> and elected Jan Høy
Hi all,
We've a solr cluster with 4 solr servers and 5 zookeepers in HA mode.
We've tested about if our cluster can mantain the service with only the half of
the cluster, in case of disaster os similar, and we've a problem with the
zookepers config and its static configuration.
In the start s
ple imagine if you
stored the entire input data as JSON in a _json_ field or some-such.
Nowadays, I'd set large="true" on such a field, which is a much newer
option.
I was able to tweak my test to have only alphabetic IDs, and the test still
failed. I don't see how the ID'
ing a query
that only returns the "id" field. No highlighting.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 10:28 AM David Smiley wrote:
> Thanks for more details. I was able to reproduce this locally! I hacke
th it here.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 6:36 AM Nussbaum, Ronen
wrote:
> Hello David,
>
> Thank you for your reply.
> It was very hard but finally I discovered how to reproduce it. I thought
>
ata; maybe that
can illustrate the problem? It's not clear if nested schema or nested docs
are actually required in your example. If you share the JIRA issue with
me, I'll chase this one down.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
i generally will only upgrade every other release. since i started with
1.4, went to 3->5->7.X, and never EVER a .0 or an even .X release,
On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 12:01 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Just avoid 8.8.0 for the moment, until 8.8.1 is released. 8.7.x s
enough for what you want to do. Basically, calculate the geodist
but subtract the radius field... maybe something like this (untested!):
sort=sub(geodist(),radius) desc. Use LatLonPointSpatialField to store
point data if you can (is appropriate), which succeeded RPT for that.
~ David Smiley
r than the original highlighter.
Just because hl.requireFieldMatch=false is the default, doesn't mean it's
the _right_ choice for everyone's app :-). I tend to think Solr should
flip this in 9.0 for both accuracy & performance sake. And unset
hl.maxAnalyzedChars -- mostly an obsolet
x2=4
tests).
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 2:20 AM Kerwin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While upgrading to Solr 8 from 6 the Unified highlighter begins to have
> performance issues going from approximately 100ms
uching the Solr
schema. If you are up for it, comment on that issue to let the original
contributor know you want to help move this forward. Maybe they do too.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 12:46 PM d
We had the same requirement. Just to echo back your requirements, I understand
your case to be this. Given these 2 doc titles:
doc 1: "information retrieval"
doc 2: "Advanced information retrieval with Solr"
You want a phrase search for "information retrieval" to find both documents,
but an EXA
likely to not highlight as much as you are highlighting
now, and highlighting more is your goal right now it appears.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 2:45 PM Shaun Campbell
wrote:
> That's great Da
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 1:08 PM Shaun Campbell
wrote:
> Hi David
>
> Getting closer now.
>
> First of all, a bit of a mistake on my part. I have two cores set up and I
> was changing the solrconfig.xml on the wrong core doh!! That's why
> highlighting wasn't bei
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 9:39 AM Shaun Campbell
wrote:
> Hi David
>
> First of all I wanted to say I'm working off your book!! Third edition,
> and I think it's a bit out of date now. I was just going to try following
> the section on the Postings highlighter, but I
enefit from putting offsets into the search index (and re-index) --
storeOffsetsWithPositions. That's an option on the field/fieldType in your
schema; it may not be obvious reading the docs. You have to opt-in to
that; Solr doesn't normally store any info in the index for highlighting.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
.
David Martín Nieto
Analista Funcional
Calle Cabeza Mesada 5
28031, Madrid
T: +34 667 414 432
T: +34 91 779 56 98| Ext. 3198
E-mail: dmart...@viewnext.com | Web: www.viewnext.com
[https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ui=2&ik=72317294cd&att
I believe Solr dont have this configuration, you need a load balancer with that
configuration mode for that.
Kind regards.
De: Kaushal Shriyan
Enviado: lunes, 11 de enero de 2021 11:32
Para: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Asunto: Apache Solr in High Availability
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11191 and I assigned it to
myself just now.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 9:50 AM Mike Drob wrote:
> I was under the impression that split shard doesn’t work w
the audience of news /
release notes), the functionality has *moved*.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 8:04 AM Eric Pugh
wrote:
> You don’t need to abandon DIH right now…. You can just use the Github
> h
ul. I know my response isn't a direct answer
to your question RE mincount... perhaps it can be made to work?
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 8:21 AM Jason Gerlowski
wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I was usi
looks like youre repeater is grabbing a file that the master merged into a
different file, why not lower how often you go from master->repeater,
and/or dont commit so often so you can make the index faster
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 12:13 PM Parshant Kumar
wrote:
> All,please help on this
>
> On Tu
FYI an updated Docker image was just published a few hours ago:
https://hub.docker.com/_/solr
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 9:06 AM Atri Sharma wrote:
> 3/11/2020, Apache Solr™ 8.7 available
>
> The L
And too this:
open files (-n) 1024
At least.
David Martín Nieto
Analista Funcional
Calle Cabeza Mesada 5
28031, Madrid
T: +34 667 414 432
T: +34 91 779 56 98| Ext. 3198
E-mail: dmart...@viewnext.com | Web: www.viewnext.com
Hi,
You must have to change the ulimit -a parameters on your SO config.
I believe the problem that you have is in:
max user processes (-u) 4096
Kind regards.
David Martín Nieto
Analista Funcional
Calle Cabeza Mesada 5
28031, Madrid
T: +34 667 414 432
cted
the warning about this in 8.7, so you won't see that again.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 4:13 PM Kris Gurusamy
wrote:
> I've just downloaded solr 8.6.3 and trying to create DIH for loading
>
ng all the docs into an
> existing index, things like changing from stored=true to
> stored=false, adding new fields, deleting fields (although the
> meta-data for the field is still kept around) etc.
>
> > On Oct 16, 2020, at 3:57 PM, David Hastings <
> hastings.recurs...@
and we
> need to be free to make important improvements with time."
>
> And all that aside, you have to re-index all the docs anyway or
> your search results will be inconsistent. So leaving aside the
> impossible task of covering all the possibilities on the fly, it’s
> b
"If you want to
keep the same field name, you need to delete all of the
documents in the index, change the schema, and reindex."
actually doesnt re-indexing a document just delete/replace anyways assuming
the same id?
On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 3:07 PM Alexandre Rafalovitch
wrote:
> Just as a side
dler. And block Config API to avoid attackers creating new
> handlers.
>
> Regards,
> Alex.
>
>> On Thu, 8 Oct 2020 at 14:54, David Hastings wrote:
>>
>> Well that’s why I suggested deleting the update handler :)
>>
>>>> On Oct 8, 2020, at 2:52
Well that’s why I suggested deleting the update handler :)
> On Oct 8, 2020, at 2:52 PM, Walter Underwood wrote:
>
> Let me know where it is and I’ll delete all the documents in your collection.
> It is easy, just one HTTP request.
>
> https://gist.github.com/nz/673027/313f70681daa985ea13ba33a
>whether we should expect Master/Slave replication also to be deprecated
it better not ever be depreciated. it has been the most reliable mechanism
for its purpose, solr cloud isnt going to replace standalone, if it does,
thats when I guess I stop upgrading or move to elastic
On Wed, Sep 30, 202
Solr maintainers continue to maintain it.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
support
arbitrary parameters you pass to Solr as-is that you don't know about in
advance (i.e. use an allow-list).
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 10:57 AM Mark Robinson
wrote:
> Hi,
> I had come across
cf1ff/lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/util/QueryBuilder.java#L653
If you can reproduce this with the "techproducts" schema, please share the
complete query. If there's a problem here, I suspect the synonyms you have
may be pertinent.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr S
Another thing to mention is to make sure the indexer you build doesnt send
commits until its actually done. Made that mistake with some early in
house indexers.
On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 9:38 AM Charlie Hull wrote:
> 1. You could write some code to pull the items out of Mongo and dump
> them to d
to trusted paths
* Prevent remote connection when using Windows UNC Paths
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
Is there any way to do a query for the minimum number of times a phrase or
string exists in a document? This has been a request from some users as
other search services (names not to be mentioned) have such a
functionality. Ive been using solr since 1.4 and i think ive tried finding
this ability
why not use a copyfield for indexing?
On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 9:59 AM Edward Turner wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Is it possible to have multiple "df" fields? (We think the answer is no
> because our experiments did not work when adding multiple "df" values to
> solrconfig.xml -- but we just wanted to do
you are probably not using
Solr 8.4.0 or beyond, which moved to having the FSTs off-heap -- at least
the ones associated with the field indexes.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 8:19 PM sanjay dutt
wrote:
>
What is the Solr field type definition for this field? And what sort of
spatial data do you add here -- just points or what?
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 10:09 PM sanjay dutt
wrote:
> Hello Solr commun
/solr auth enable -prompt
true
Both fail with the NPE.
Thanks,
David.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 31, 2020, at 7:03 PM, Jason Gerlowski wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
> I tried this out locally but couldn't reproduce. The command you
> provided above works just fine for me.
"Oh, and returning 100K docs is an anti-pattern, if you really need that
many docs consider cursorMark and/or Streaming."
er, i routinely ask for 2+ million records into a single file based on a
query. I mean not into a web application or anything, its meant to be
processed after the fact, but so
so, your zookeeper/solr servers have public facing addresses/ports?
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 4:41 PM Odysci wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I suspect one of our Zookeeper installations on AWS was subject to a Meow
> attack (
>
> https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2020/07/more-than-1000-database
When I issue “bin/solr auth enable -prompt true -blockUnknown true”, I get a
Null Pointer Exception. I’m using the 8.5.1 release. Am I doing something
wrong?
Thanks.
Sent from my iPhone
ercaseFilter in front of your patternreplace,
> you’re removing uppercase characters.
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> > On Jul 15, 2020, at 3:06 PM, David Hastings <
> hastings.recurs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > howdy,
> > i have a field that sorts fine all ot
howdy,
i have a field that sorts fine all other content, and i cant seem to debug
why it wont sort for me on this one chunk of it.
"sort":"alphatitle asc", "debugQuery":"on", "_":"1594733127740"}}, "response
":{"numFound":3,"start":0,"docs":[ { "title":"Money orders", {
"title":"Finance,
consolidat
I believe you are experiencing this bug: LUCENE-5056
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5056>
The fix would probably be adjusting code in here
org.apache.lucene.spatial.query.SpatialArgs#calcDistanceFromErrPct
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linked
Here's my PR, which includes some edits to the ref guide docs where I tried
to clarify these settings a little too.
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/1651
~ David
On Sat, Jul 4, 2020 at 8:44 AM Nándor Mátravölgyi
wrote:
> I guess that's fair. Let's have hl.fragsiz
;true"?
We agree on better documenting the perf trade-off.
Thanks again for working on these settings, BTW.
~ David
On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 1:25 PM Nándor Mátravölgyi
wrote:
> Since the issue seems to be affecting the highlighter differently
> based on which mode it is using,
class="solr.RptWithGeometrySpatialField" which internally is based off a
combination of a course grid and storing the original vector geometry for
accurate verification:
The internally coarser grid will lessen the impact of that pole bug.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search
ing with '0') and additional performance
benefit from that.
What do you think Nandor, Michal?
I'm hoping a change in settings (+ some better notes/docs on this) could
slip into an 8.6, all done by myself ASAP.
~ David
On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 2:32 PM Nándor Mátravölgyi
wrote:
> Hi
script, you _should_ have had very clear
> > evidence that that was the cause.
> >
> > If you were not running the killer script, the apologies for not asking
> > about that
> > in the first place. Java’s performance is unpredictable when OOMs happen,
> > which is th
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 1:00 PM David Hastings <
> hastings.recurs...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > me personally, around 290gb. as much as we could shove into them
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 12:44 PM Erick Erickson >
> > wrote:
> &g
ntinue this conversation here while making sure that we converge
> without much bike-shedding.
>
> -Anshum
>
--
David Cumings
AU: +61 498 137 841
US: +1 (929) 291-0801
UK: +44 7725 057 500 <-- Currently in the UK
IN: +91 82771 96058
d...@cumings.com
priv...@lucene.apache.org but it should have been public and expect it to
spill out to the dev list today.
~ David
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 11:14 AM Mike Drob wrote:
> Hi Jan,
>
> Can you link to the discussion? I searched the dev list and didn’t see
> anything, is it on slack
I strongly recommend setting indexed=true on a field you facet on for the
purposes of efficient refinement (fq=field:value). But it strictly isn't
required, as you have discovered.
~ David
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 9:02 AM Michael Gibney
wrote:
> facet.method=enum works by executing
I cant give you a 100% true answer but ive experienced this, and what
"seemed" to happen to me was that the optimize would start, and that will
drive the size up by 3 fold, and if you out of disk space in the process
the optimize will quit since, it cant optimize, and leave the live index
pieces in
the sum of the heap allocations across all your JVMs should be below
> that percentage. See Uwe Schindler's mmapdirectiry blog...
>
> Shot in the dark...
>
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2020, 11:51 David Hastings
> wrote:
>
> > To add to this, i generally have solr start with
David –
It’s fine to take this conversation back to the mailing list. Thank you very
much again for your suggestions.
I think you are correct. It doesn’t appear necessary to set termOffsets, and
it appears that that the unified highlighter is using the TERM_VECTORS offset
source if I don’t
To add to this, i generally have solr start with this:
-Xms31000m-Xmx31000m
and the only other thing that runs on them are maria db gallera cluster
nodes that are not in use (aside from replication)
the 31gb is not an accident either, you dont want 32gb.
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 11:26 AM Shawn H
Hi Erick,
Thank you for your answer.
Unfortunatelly our most important field is that text field, so, we need to
index it. We will have to assume that big documents takes a long time to
index.
Best,
David
David Dávila Atienza
AEAT - Departamento de Informática Tributaria
Subdirección de
tested with Solr 7.4 and Solr 4.10
Thanks,
David
Hi Mikhail
Your suggested solution does seem to work for me. Thank you so much for the
help!
Best regards
David
For future reference in case someone else wants do the same, here are some more
details about the steps needed:
- The more like this handler is not in the default solrconfig.xml
up as standalone and not in cloud mode.
Best
David
Zookeeper is annoying to both set up and manage, but then again the same
thing can be said about solr cloud. not certain why you would want to deal
with either
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 3:29 PM S G wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I recently stumbled across KIP-500: Replace ZooKeeper with a Self-Managed
> Meta
>
> Why have a cold backup and then switch?
>
my current set up is:
1. master indexer
2. master slave on a release/commit basis
3. 3 live slave searching nodes in two data different centers
the three live nodes are in front of nginx load balancing and they are
mostly hot but not all of them, i f
then recombining the
results. But that way I don’t know if the resulting scores are comparable? Can
I assume a score of 15 from the English edismax is better than a score of 13
from the German edismax?
Best regards
David
On 5 Jun 2020, at 19:39, Erick Erickson
mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com
I could need some advice on how to handle a particular cross language search
with Solr. I posted it on Stackoverflow 2 months ago, but could not find a
solution.
I have documents in 3 languages (English, German, French). For simplicity let's
assume it's just two languages (English and German). T
searching on an
aggregate catch-all field.
~ David
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 6:40 PM Walter Underwood
wrote:
> Are you sure they will wonder? I’d try it without that and see if the
> simpler UI is easier to use. Simple almost always wins the A/B test.
>
> You can use the highlighter t
arger than the Reuters ones (so it
appears, any way). I had to do a bit of hacking to use the
"LengthGoalBreakIterator, which wasn't previously used by this framework.
~ David
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 4:42 PM Michal Hlavac wrote:
> fine, I'l try to write simple test, thank
Please create an issue. I haven't reproduced it yet but it seems unlikely
to be user-error.
~ David
On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 9:28 AM Michal Hlavac wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have field:
> stored="true" indexed="false" storeOffsetsWithPositions="true"/&
Wow that's terrible!
So this problem is for SENTENCE in particular, and it's a regression in
8.5? I'll see if I can reproduce this with the Lucene benchmark module.
I figure you have some meaty text, like "page" size or longer?
~ David
On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 10:3
ich is what
bin/post does with HTML.
Good luck!
~ David
On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 10:52 AM Serkan KAZANCI
wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> I have many meta-tags in html documents like content="2019-10-15T23:59:59Z"> which matches the field descriptions in
> schema file.
>
> A
s a problem, and the root cause is here:
LUCENE-5734 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5734> It's on
my long TODO list but hasn't bitten me lately so I've neglected it.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
O
I get
around to implementing hl.preserveMulti for the UH, i'll have it make this
assumption likewise.
~ David
On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 1:48 PM Walter Underwood
wrote:
> I’m a little amused that this thread has become active after almost two
> months of silence.
>
> I thin
You've probably gotten you answer now but "no". Basically, you'd need to
specify your own subclass of UnifiedSolrHighlighter in solrconfig.xml like
this:
Error loading class 'solr.highlight.CustomPassageFormatter'".
>
> Example from solrconfig.xml:
> class="solr.highlight.CustomPassageFormat
ntirety, which is a null concatenated sequence of all
the values for this field for a document.
~ David
On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 2:02 PM Walter Underwood
wrote:
> We are testing 6.6.1.
>
> wunder
> Walter Underwood
> wun...@wunderwood.org
> http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my
t'd be nice
if Solr had a DocTransformer to accomplish that.
I know it's been awhile; I'm curious how the UH has been working for you,
assuming you are using it.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Sun, Jun 2, 2019 at
diagnose the underlying problem and possibly
fix.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 9:02 AM Szűcs Roland
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I use Solr 8.4.1 and implement suggester functionality. As part of the
> suggestio
ow to
reproduce this from what Solr ships with, like the techproducts example
schema and dataset.
~ David
On Sun, Jul 21, 2019 at 10:07 PM Richard Walker
wrote:
> On 22 Jul 2019, at 11:32 am, Richard Walker
> wrote:
> > I'm trying out the advice in the user guide
> > (
What did you end up doing, Eric? Did you migrate to the Unified
Highlighter?
~ David
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 4:36 PM Eric Allen
wrote:
> Thanks for the reply.
>
> Currently we are migrating from solr4 to solr8 under solr 4 we wrote our
> own highlighter because the provided one
debug=query to Solr then you'll get a a parsed
version of the query that would be helpful to me.
~ David
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 10:46 AM Warren, David [USA]
wrote:
> I am running Solr 8.4 and am attempting to use its highlighting feature.
> It appears to work well when I use the origina
the bq parameter, heres a SO thread for it:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/45150856/how-to-know-when-to-use-solr-bq-vs-bf-and-how-to-apply-query-logic
On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 6:27 PM Stephen Lewis Bianamara <
stephen.bianam...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Paras,
>
> I'm not sure I follow. How wou
.mincount=1
&hl=false
&fl=id, text, users
&wt=json
&sort=date desc
Working well so far, but still not ideal.
Thanks for the assist,
David
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 7:31 PM Srijan wrote:
> I see what you mean now. You could use two queries - first would return 100
> randomly
015,
"3",3021,
"2",736,
"1",41,
"34",41,
"35",32,
"72",8,
"7",1]},
RESULTS I WANT:
"response":{"numFound":100,"start":0,"docs":[]
},
I'm looking for a way if possible to run a query with random results, where
I limit the number of results I want back, yet still have the facets
accurately reflect the results I'm searching.
When I run a search I use a filter query to randomize the results based on
a modulo of a random seed. This
at the Solr highlighting
documentation, I didn’t see any additional configuration which needs to be done
to get the unified highlighter to work.
I realize I have not provided a bunch of information here, but obviously can
provide more if needed.
Thank you,
David Warren
Booz | Allen | Hamilton
703-625-0311 mobile
you should never use the stopword filter unless you have a very specific
purpose
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 8:33 AM Steven White wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> What is, if any, the impact of stopwords in to my search ranking quality?
> Will my ranking improve is I do not index stopwords?
>
> I'm trying
i wouldnt worry about the index size until you get above a half terabyte or
so. adding doc values and other features means you sacrifice things that
dont matter, like size. memory and ssd's are cheap.
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 1:21 PM Rajdeep Sahoo
wrote:
> Hi all
> We are migrating from solr 4.
master slave is the idea that you have an indexing server you do all
indexing to and a search server that replicates the index, to deliver the
results etc. if you keep the indexer separate you can tune it differently
as well as protect the data. also means you can remove the delete/update
request
Honestly? I know this isnt what youre going to want to hear, but security
through obscurity. no one else knows what port the servers on, and its not
accessible from anything outside of the internal network. if your solr
install can be accessed from an external IP you have much larger issues.
On
Hi all,
Consider the following edismax query parser usage:
{!edismax qf="field1 field2" v=$query}
A local variable, in this case, query, is used in the parser, through use of
the dollar sign operator.
Does the LTR query parser have the same capability?
Thanks,
David White
Th
I don’t think anyone is responding because it’s too focused of a use case,
where you just simply have to figure out an alternative on your own.
> On Feb 19, 2020, at 12:28 AM, Ashwin Ramesh wrote:
>
> ping on this :)
>
>> On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 11:50 AM Ashwin Ramesh wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
ful stuff.
>
> Luckily for you, the patent on that has expired. :-)
>
> wunder
> Walter Underwood
> wun...@wunderwood.org
> http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
>
> > On Feb 17, 2020, at 10:46 AM, David Hastings <
> hastings.recurs...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
i use stop words for building shingles into "interesting phrases" for my
machine teacher/students, so i wouldnt say theres no reason, however my use
case is very specific. Otherwise yeah, theyre gone for all practical
reasons/search scenarios.
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 1:41 PM Walter Underwood
wro
n 9.0 as it's obsolete.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 6:47 AM vas aj wrote:
> Hi team,
>
> I am using Lucene 6.6.2, Spatial4j 0.7, lucene-spatial-extras 6.6.2. I am
> trying to create a Spat
1 - 100 of 1471 matches
Mail list logo
