Is it a formal feature that solr 3.1 support? Or still as experimental
feature? If it is experimental feature, i would still be hesitating to use
it.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/edismax-available-in-solr-3-1-tp2910613p2920975.html
Sent from the Solr - Use
I know about dismax. But with that, i can't perform prefix and fuzzy query.
can edismax handle prefix and fuzzy query?
My application logic just pass the user entered text to solr server to
perform term query, phrase query, prefix and fuzzy query. And i don't want
to escape the special char
Hi,
When user entered text contains special character, can this being taken care
by the tokenizer/filter configured at the field?
In application code, Do i need to parse the user input string and add the
escape in front of those special character? If so, will those special
characters differ for
Hi,
is edixmax available in solr 3.1? I don't see any documentation about it.
if it is, does it support the prefix and fuzzy query?
Thanks,
cy
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/edismax-available-in-solr-3-1-tp2910613p2910613.html
Sent from the Solr - User
Nice, it works like a charm.
I am using solr 1.4.1. Here is my configuration for the chinese field:
Now when I get the expected hassle free parsing on solr side:
title_zh_CN:(我活)
title_zh_CN:(我活)
title_zh_CN:我 title_zh_CN:活
ti
Hi,
In solr admin query full interface page, the following query with english
become term query according to debug :
title_en_US: (blood red)
title_en_US: (blood red)
title_en_US: (blood red)
title_en_US:blood title_en_US:red
title_en_US:blood title_en_US:red
However, using the same syntax wi
Sorry i didn't mean to give random reply. It is just today my solr
configuration/schema is different now and can't get the error message.
Anyway, i rerun the test.
Basically by specifying such searchcomponent and requesthandler, you won't
get any error.
When you query this it is fine without an
Hi,
I have a use case where i need to know for a paritcular multivalue field,
which particular value match when a query is run on that field. For
example, for a movie document, movie title name is single-value field,
movie actors is multi-value field. When user search "colin", i know it is
"col
I tried it. It just does not work. the debug component only works when
query component is there, and it is just showing debugging information for
query result, not term match result.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-to-debug-if-termsComponent-is-used-tp28
Hi, I defined a searchHanlder just for the sake of autosuggest, using
TermsComponent.
explicit
terms
debug
This configuration might not even make sense, to configure "terms" and
"debug" component together. Is "debug" component must be wired up
Thanks a lot. That makes sense. -- CY
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Reader-per-query-request-tp2867778p2867995.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Just pushing up the topic and look for answers.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Too-many-open-files-exception-related-to-solrj-getServer-too-often-tp2808718p2867976.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
I was wondering if solr open a new lucene IndexReader for every query
request?
>From performance point of view, is there any problem of opening a lot of
IndexReaders concurrently, or application shall have some logic to reuse the
same IndexReader?
Thanks,
cy
--
View this message in
Hi,
I get this solrj error in development environment.
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrServerException: java.net.SocketException:
Too many open files
At the time there was no reindexing or any write to the index. There were
only different queries genrated using solrj to hit solr server:
OK, i will have to wait till solr 3 release then.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Fuzzy-query-using-dismax-query-parser-tp2727075p2727572.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
iorixxx, thanks for your reply.
Another a little bit off topic question. I looked over all the subclasses
of QParserPlugin. It seesm like most of them provide complementary parsing
to the default lucene/solr parser. Except prefixParser. What is the
intended usage of that one? The default luc
Hi,
I wonder how to conduct fuzzy query using dismax query parser? I am able to
do prefix query with local params and prefixQueryParser. But how to handle
fuzzy query?
I like the behavior of dismax except it does not support the prefix query
and fuzzy query.
Thanks.
cy
--
View this message
Hi iorixxx,
Thanks for your reply. yeah, an additional query with the boost value will
work.
However, I just wonder where you get the information that BoostQParserPlugin
only handles function query?
I looked up the javadoc, and still can't get that. This is the javadoc.
Create a boosted quer
Hi,
I need to code some boosting logic when some field equal to some value. I
was able to get it work if using dismax query parser. However, since the
solr query will need to handle prefix or fuzzy query, therefore, dismax
query parser is not really my choice.
Therefore, i want to use standa
Hi,
This solr query faile:
1. get every title regardless what the title_name is
2. within the result, boost the one which genre id = 56. (bq=genres:56^100)
http://localhost:8983/solr/titles/select?indent=on&version=2.2&start=0&rows=10&fl=*%2Cscore&wt=standard&defType=dismax&qf=title_name_en_US&
I just tried with some real spanish text:
"Alquileres" -->
=
org.apache.solr.analysis.LowerCaseFilterFactory {}
term position 1
term text alquileres
term type word
source start,end4,14
payload
Sorry Robert. I just use some text translated by someone. Maybe that
translation is not right.
Could you please give me a spanish term which i can show the spanish
stemming factory is working?
Thanks,
cyang
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/stopFilterFactor
Robert,
Thanks for your advice. I modified my stopword text file. Now the
stopwordFilter start to work.
But the stemming related filter (SnowballPorterFilterFactory-- spanish)
still not working. Anyone have any idea on that?
Thanks,
cyang
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472
I am using solr 1.4.1. I am trying to index a spanish field using the
following tokenizer/filters:
Using field analysis solr Admin i can tell StopFilterFactory and
SnowballPorterFilterFactory with Spanish not working right:
1. after stop
Does it make sense to apply WordDelimiterFilterFactory to non-english
language, such as spanish? What about asian lanaguage?
The following are the typical use case for WordDelimiterFilterFactory. Is
1, 2, 3, and 4 applicable to all wester language (including spanish)? For
asian language, is
Hi,
Anyone knows how to intercept the http request made by solrj?
I only see the url being printed out when the request is invalid. But still
as part of development/debugging process, i want to verify what http request
it sent out to solr server.
Thanks.
CY
--
View this message in context:
Erick,
Thanks for reply.
Is there anyway that i can instruct to combine seperate filter queries with
UNION result, without creating the 3rd filter query cache as I described
above?
If not, shall I give up using filter query for such scenario (where i query
the same field with multiple value usin
Right, i can combine that into one fq query.
The only thing is that i want to reduce the cache size.
I remember this is what i read from wiki.
fq=rating:R (filter query cache A)
fq=rating:PG-13 (filter query cache B)
fq=rating:(R O PG-13) -- (It won't be able to leverage the fil
I wonder what is the logical relation among filter queries. I can't find
much documentation on filter query.
for example, i want to find all titles that is either PG-13 or R through
filter query. The following query won't give me any result back. So I
suppose by default it is intersection amo
This is the solr schema:
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Help-on-Multi-language-support-tp2636054p2636065.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
I wonder how solr can satisfy our multi-language requirement.
For example, for movie/tv series titles, We require that based on user
preferred language, user is able to get back titles name (and actor,
directors) by selected language. For example, getTitlesByGenreId. On the
other hand,
It turn out you don't need to use dateFormatTransformer at all. The reason
why the timestamp mysql column fail to be inserted to solr is because in
schema.xml i mistakenly set "index=false, stored=false". Of course that
won't make it come to index at all. No wonder schema browser always show no
I wonder how to run dataimporthandler in debug mode. Currently i can't get
data correctly into index through dataimporthandler, especially a timestamp
column to solr date field. I want to debug the process.
According to this wiki page:
Commands
The handler exposes all its API as http requests .
Bill,
I did try to use the way you suggested above. Unfortunately it does not
work either.
It is pretty much the same as my last reply, except the
dateTimeFormat="-MM-dd'T'hh:mm:ss"
Thanks,
cyang
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/indexing-mysql-dateTime-
Yes, I am pretty sure every row has a modified field. I did my testing
before posting question.
I tried with adding DateFormatTransformer, still not help.
I assume it is o
Hi,
I can't seem to be able to index to a solr date field from a query result
using DataImportHandler. Anyone else know how to resoleve the problem?
When i check the solr do
Can I know why? I thought solr is tuned for string if no sorting of facet by
range query is needed.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/numberic-or-string-type-for-non-sortable-field-tp2606353p2607932.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.
Sorry i didn't make my question clear.
I will only facet based on field value, not ranged query (it is just some
ids for a multi-value field). And i won't do sort on the field either.
In that case, is string more efficient for the requirement?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene
I wonder if i shall use solr int or string for such field with following
requirement
multi-value
facet needed
sort not needed
The field value is a an id. Therefore, i can store as either numeric field
or just a string. Shall i choose string for efficiency?
Thanks.
--
View this message in c
Thanks you both.
In order to get it (e.g. filter query --> http://...&fq:genres=ACTION &
ADVENTURE) work in browser, i have to explicitly put url encode for special
character, regardless what following solution i use:
1. Using double quote on filter query field
2. Using escape on special char
How to handle special character when constructing filter query?
for example, i want to do something like:
http://.&fq=genre:ACTION & ADVENTURE
How do i handle the space and & in the filter query part?
Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-to
Once i change the query to be:
+name:memory features:battery^100
+name:memory features:battery^100
+name:memory features:battery^100
+name:memori features:batteri^100.0
+name:memori features:batteri^100.0
Then it gets rid of result that only result which does not match
name:memory.
However
For the solr example(exampleDIH), how do i achieve the following with
standard queryparser?
search all docs which name field contains "memory" (primary query logic),
Within that resultset, boost the doc matches features:battery (boosting
logic).
Note that I have to use standard queryparse
That makes sense. It is a little bit indirect. You have to translate that
user preference/profile into a search field value and then dictate search
result boosting the doc with that preference value.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/solr-render-biased-sear
Hi,
I am asked that whether solr renders biased search result? For example, for
this search (query all movie title by this Comedy genre), for user who
indicates a preference to 1950's movies, solr renders the 1950's movies with
higher score (top in the list)?Or if user is a kid, then the re
I think what you are trying to achieve is called taxonomy facet.
There is a solution for that. Check for the slides for Taxonomy faceting.
http://www.lucidimagination.com/solutions/webcasts/faceting
However, i don't know if you are able to render the hierachy all at once.
The solution i point
My current project has the requirement to support search when user inputs any
number of terms across a few index fields (movie title, actor, director).
In order to maximize result, I plan to support all those searches listed in
the subject, phrase, individual term, prefix, fuzzy and stemming. Of
Some typo out there in my example: I mean the first 2 movies by angelina
jolie. This is the correct example:
result 1: <-- title match
score: 1.0
title_name: tom's story
actor: Angelina Jolie
result 2: <-- title match
score: 0.95
title_name: tom green's store
actor: Angelina Jolie
result
I don't think this field collapsing can simply solve my problem after second
thought.
As I mentioned, user only type in a search phrase, and click on search.
Underlying that, the application logic is going to compose search query
against multiple fields (title_name, actors, directors, ...) by th
Just a little clarification, when i say position of the term, i mean the
position of the term within the field.
For example,
"Jamie Lee" -- Lee is the second position of the name field.
"Lee Jamie" -- Lee is the first position of the name field in this case.
--
View this message in context
Hi Em,
Thanks for reply.
Basically you are saying there is no builtin solution that care about the
position of the term to impact the relevancy score. In my scenario, i will
get those two document with the same score. The order depends on the
sequence of indexing.
Thanks,
Cyang
--
View t
Let me describe the question using an example:
If search "Lee" on name field as exact term match,
returning result can be:
Lee Jamie
Jamie Lee
Will solr grant higher score to "Lee Jamie" vs "Jamie Lee" based on the
position of the term in name field of each document?
>From what i know, the sc
By taking a quick look, that field collapsing seem to be what i want. I am
not sure what clusteringcomponent is still. I will look into more.
Is "Field Collapsing" a new feature for solr 4.0 (not yet released yet)?
If so, i will have to wait for it.
Thanks for point it out!
--
View this
Since it is a search applying for all fields, and the only result that
require grouping is people (actors/directors), i am guessing this:
1. The search still queries single index.
2. there are two searches underlying. One for matching movie/tv name,
genres name. The other one for top two matc
Let me give an example to illustrate my question:
On netflix site, the search box allow you to search by movie, tv shows,
actors, directors, and genres.
If "Tomcat" is searched, it gives result as: move titles with "Tomcat" or
whatever, and somewhere in between , it also show two actors, "Tom
I am not sure if i really understand what that mean by clean=false.
In my understanding, for full-import with default clean=true, it will blow
off all document of the existing index. Then full import data from a table
into a index. Is that right?
Then for clean=false, my understanding is that
Hi,
I am new to the lucene/solr. I have a very general question, and hope to
hear your recommendation.
Do you need a middleware/module between your search client and solr server?
The response message is very solr specific. Do you need to translate it to
application object model and return b
57 matches
Mail list logo
