Group and Field Collapsing in SOLR "More like this"

work. Any other way to achieve it Thanks Balaji -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Group-and-Field-Collapsing-in-SOLR-More-like-this-tp4101032.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

ConcurrentModificationException - SolrCmdDistributor

. Thanks, Balaji -- :: Daring ideas are like chessmen moved forward; they may be beaten, but they may start a winning game. - Johann Wolfgang von Goethe ::

Re: SOLR Query Intersection

Hi, Thank you guys Erik and Mikhail , You saved my day Thanks Balaji -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-Query-Intersection-tp3818756p3819571.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: SOLR Query Intersection

Hi, I got your point are you suggesting me to run using the *facet.query* param for the various combinations Thanks Balaji -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-Query-Intersection-tp3818756p3819165.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at

Re: SOLR Query Intersection

Hi Mikhail, Yes I am trying to get the facets counts for all these and populate the chart , but comparison between the values is what I am wondering Will facets handle all the 3 possible scenarios Thanks Balaji -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR

SOLR Query Intersection

tion among them like "Google & IE" , "Google & Firefox" Is it possible to do with the Query Intersections or do I need to write separate queries for all the above , If not please suggest how it can be achieved Thanks Balaji -- View this message in context: h

Re: Boost Exact matches on Specific Fields

ams I am able to see it split and trigger by checking the SOLR Analysis page Thanks Balaji On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 6:11 AM, Balaji S wrote: > Yeah I will change the weight for str_category and make it higher . I > converted it to lowercase because we cannot expect users to ty

Re: Boost Exact matches on Specific Fields

Yeah I will change the weight for str_category and make it higher . I converted it to lowercase because we cannot expect users to type them in the correct case Thanks Balaji On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 3:52 AM, Way Cool wrote: > I will give str_category more weight than ts_category because

Re: Boost Exact matches on Specific Fields

^5.0 ts_category^10.0 str_category^8.0 The One Question I have here is All the above mentioned fields will have "Hospital" present in them , will the above approach work to get the exact match on the top and bring "Hospitalization" below in the results Thanks Balaji On Tue,

Boost Exact matches on Specific Fields

y^4.0 title^5.0 ts_category^21.0" and also sort on SCORE desc When I do a search against "Hospitals" . I get "Hospitalization Management , Hospital Equipment & Supplies " on Top rather than the exact matches of "Hospitals" So It would be great , If

Re: Synonyms Not Working when using SRC & DEST

e approach " allergy test => allergy test, Doctors, Doctors-Medical, PHYSICIANS, Physicians & Surgeons " and it works as expected , Thanks for making it more clear Thanks Balaji -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Synonyms-Not-Working-when-usin

Re: Synonyms Not Working when using SRC & DEST

So, as the other respondent indicated, currently you replace allergy with > the other list when indexing, and since allergy is not replaced during > query, it gets no hits. > I replace allergy during the index with doctors , So it shouldn't be part of the document ? Thanks Balaji -- Vi

Re: Synonyms Not Working when using SRC & DEST

on the LHS of "=>" and replace with all alternatives on the RHS. So when I do a search "allergy test" it should map with doctors and should bring me results but it is not mapping . Is there any way I make it work Hope it clarifies Thanks Balaji -- View

Synonyms Not Working when using SRC & DEST

ym file to a comma separated I am able to see the results It would be great if you can help me out with this Thanks Balaji -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Synonyms-Not-Working-when-using-SRC-DEST-tp3313862p3313862.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing lis

Re: How to display results across multiple pages when grouping is enabled by default

-is-enabled-by-default-tp3300292p3308558.html This email was sent by Balaji N.S. (via Nabble)

Re: How to display results across multiple pages when grouping is enabled by default

72066.n3.nabble.com/How-to-display-results-across-multiple-pages-when-grouping-is-enabled-by-default-tp3300292p3306685.html This email was sent by Balaji N.S. (via Nabble)

Re: Solritas issue in opening files

browser like Firefox. __ If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solritas-issue-in-opening-files-tp3300836p3300872.html This email was sent by Balaji N.S. (via Nabble) To receive all replies

Re: Solritas issue in opening files

browser like Firefox. __ If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solritas-issue-in-opening-files-tp3300836p3300867.html This email was sent by Balaji N.S. (via Nabble) To receive all

How to display results across multiple pages when grouping is enabled by default

-when-grouping-is-enabled-by-default-tp3300292p3300292.html This email was sent by Balaji N.S. (via Nabble) To receive all replies by email, subscribe to this discussion: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=subscribe_by_code&node=330